Impact of general vs. neuraxial anesthesia on neonatal outcomes in non-elective cesarean sections.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2025.1518456
Enrico Cocchi, Rita Pini, Antonella Gallipoli, Marcello Stella, Patrizio Antonazzo, Federico Marchetti, Vanni Agnoletti
{"title":"Impact of general vs. neuraxial anesthesia on neonatal outcomes in non-elective cesarean sections.","authors":"Enrico Cocchi, Rita Pini, Antonella Gallipoli, Marcello Stella, Patrizio Antonazzo, Federico Marchetti, Vanni Agnoletti","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1518456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cesarean section is a common surgical procedure, usually performed under neuraxial anesthesia and, more rarely, under general anesthesia. The choice of anesthesia in cesarean sections can significantly influence neonatal outcomes, especially in urgent and emergency cases. Previous studies have shown mixed results, often confounded by the inclusion of both elective and emergency cesarean section cases, varying statistical methods, and a focus solely on resuscitation immediate-term neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to use robust statistical methods to evaluate the impact of anesthesia type on immediate and longer-term neonatal outcomes in urgent and emergency cesarean section cases, where additional detrimental factors might influence this relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 395 women who underwent non-elective cesarean sections between 2021 and 2023. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) served to focus on the role of anesthesia type eliminating confounding variables effect, in simulated randomized controlled trial conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>General anesthesia increases odds of neonatal resuscitation (OR 6.1, <i>p</i> < 0.001), NICU admission (OR 1.8, <i>p</i>: 0.04), and a 15% lower Apgar score at 1 min (<i>p</i>: 0.02). General anesthesia also increased NICU admission rate for respiratory insufficiency (OR 7.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001), the need for oxygen (OR 4.8, <i>p</i>: 0.003) and CPAP (OR 3.6, <i>p</i> < 0.001) in NICU. Negative controls and consistent sensitivity analyses further validated the robustness of our findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>General anesthesia in non-elective cesarean sections is associated with worse neonatal outcomes, extending beyond the resuscitation phase to sustained NICU morbidity. Our study provides novel insights into the specific neonatal resuscitation maneuvers required when general anesthesia is used, enhancing clinicians preparedness for managing high-risk deliveries. These findings underscore the critical importance of anesthesia choice, advocate for the preference of neuraxial techniques, and highlight the need for further research into long-term neonatal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1518456"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1518456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section is a common surgical procedure, usually performed under neuraxial anesthesia and, more rarely, under general anesthesia. The choice of anesthesia in cesarean sections can significantly influence neonatal outcomes, especially in urgent and emergency cases. Previous studies have shown mixed results, often confounded by the inclusion of both elective and emergency cesarean section cases, varying statistical methods, and a focus solely on resuscitation immediate-term neonatal outcomes.

Objective: This study aims to use robust statistical methods to evaluate the impact of anesthesia type on immediate and longer-term neonatal outcomes in urgent and emergency cesarean section cases, where additional detrimental factors might influence this relationship.

Methods: We analyzed 395 women who underwent non-elective cesarean sections between 2021 and 2023. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) served to focus on the role of anesthesia type eliminating confounding variables effect, in simulated randomized controlled trial conditions.

Results: General anesthesia increases odds of neonatal resuscitation (OR 6.1, p < 0.001), NICU admission (OR 1.8, p: 0.04), and a 15% lower Apgar score at 1 min (p: 0.02). General anesthesia also increased NICU admission rate for respiratory insufficiency (OR 7.6, p < 0.001), the need for oxygen (OR 4.8, p: 0.003) and CPAP (OR 3.6, p < 0.001) in NICU. Negative controls and consistent sensitivity analyses further validated the robustness of our findings.

Conclusion: General anesthesia in non-elective cesarean sections is associated with worse neonatal outcomes, extending beyond the resuscitation phase to sustained NICU morbidity. Our study provides novel insights into the specific neonatal resuscitation maneuvers required when general anesthesia is used, enhancing clinicians preparedness for managing high-risk deliveries. These findings underscore the critical importance of anesthesia choice, advocate for the preference of neuraxial techniques, and highlight the need for further research into long-term neonatal outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
期刊最新文献
Association of bundled care interventions in improving outcomes for pediatric patients with congenital heart disease: a retrospective clinical evaluation. Case Report: Late coronary complication of Kawasaki disease. Maternal autoimmune diseases and the risk of tics and Tourette's disorder in offspring: insights from Taiwan's real-world data. Impact of general vs. neuraxial anesthesia on neonatal outcomes in non-elective cesarean sections. Atypical thyroid manifestation in Cowden disease: a case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1