Selective dorsal rhizotomy from indication to rehabilitation: a worldwide survey.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Child's Nervous System Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s00381-025-06786-5
Liza M M van Dijk, K Mariam Slot, Tom F Novacheck, Annemieke I Buizer, Nelleke G Langerak
{"title":"Selective dorsal rhizotomy from indication to rehabilitation: a worldwide survey.","authors":"Liza M M van Dijk, K Mariam Slot, Tom F Novacheck, Annemieke I Buizer, Nelleke G Langerak","doi":"10.1007/s00381-025-06786-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a neurosurgical treatment used worldwide to reduce spasticity. The procedure has undergone many changes since its introduction in the early 1900s, and currently, different centers vary in many aspects of the procedure. We surveyed centers on different continents regarding SDR indications, surgical techniques, and postoperative rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten centers worldwide with SDR experience participated in an online survey preparing for a pre-conference workshop in 2022. The main topics were patient characteristics, the selection process, surgery, and rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Universal suitable candidates for SDR were patients with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy, Gross Motor Function Classification System levels II or III, ages 5 to 7 years, and adequate strength, motor control, and access to postoperative rehabilitation. Centers differed in additional inclusion and exclusion criteria and the use of diagnostic tools. Both single- and multilevel approaches were used, with electrophysiological monitoring applied in all approaches. Intensive rehabilitation was recommended after surgery, followed by a less intensive program, with variations in duration, therapy frequency, modalities used, and follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey demonstrated many similarities in several aspects of the SDR procedure in centers performing SDR worldwide, while considerable variability was also seen. The results emphasize the need for standardized reporting of SDR procedures and outcome measures to enable international comparative studies. A Delphi procedure could be a first step to reaching a consensus on outcome measurements, which may lead to a consensus regarding the most suitable candidates, surgical techniques, and rehabilitation programs to improve functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9970,"journal":{"name":"Child's Nervous System","volume":"41 1","pages":"133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child's Nervous System","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-025-06786-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a neurosurgical treatment used worldwide to reduce spasticity. The procedure has undergone many changes since its introduction in the early 1900s, and currently, different centers vary in many aspects of the procedure. We surveyed centers on different continents regarding SDR indications, surgical techniques, and postoperative rehabilitation.

Methods: Ten centers worldwide with SDR experience participated in an online survey preparing for a pre-conference workshop in 2022. The main topics were patient characteristics, the selection process, surgery, and rehabilitation.

Results: Universal suitable candidates for SDR were patients with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy, Gross Motor Function Classification System levels II or III, ages 5 to 7 years, and adequate strength, motor control, and access to postoperative rehabilitation. Centers differed in additional inclusion and exclusion criteria and the use of diagnostic tools. Both single- and multilevel approaches were used, with electrophysiological monitoring applied in all approaches. Intensive rehabilitation was recommended after surgery, followed by a less intensive program, with variations in duration, therapy frequency, modalities used, and follow-up periods.

Conclusion: This survey demonstrated many similarities in several aspects of the SDR procedure in centers performing SDR worldwide, while considerable variability was also seen. The results emphasize the need for standardized reporting of SDR procedures and outcome measures to enable international comparative studies. A Delphi procedure could be a first step to reaching a consensus on outcome measurements, which may lead to a consensus regarding the most suitable candidates, surgical techniques, and rehabilitation programs to improve functional outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child's Nervous System
Child's Nervous System 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal has been expanded to encompass all aspects of pediatric neurosciences concerning the developmental and acquired abnormalities of the nervous system and its coverings, functional disorders, epilepsy, spasticity, basic and clinical neuro-oncology, rehabilitation and trauma. Global pediatric neurosurgery is an additional field of interest that will be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Cost of pediatric traumatic brain injury in developing countries: a retrospective cohort study. Endoscopic endonasal versus open approach for craniopharyngioma treatment: a systematic review of clinical characteristics. Pial arteriovenous fistula with a large intraparenchymal hemorrhage in a 9-year-old child: a case report and case-based mini review. Selective dorsal rhizotomy from indication to rehabilitation: a worldwide survey. Clinical and surgical outcomes of pediatric Cushing's disease following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1