Analgesic Efficacy of Thoracoscopic Direct-View Versus Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Multi-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Study.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S492040
Yao Tong, Jimin Wu, Xuhui Wu, Yunchang Mo, Faxing Wang
{"title":"Analgesic Efficacy of Thoracoscopic Direct-View Versus Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Multi-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Study.","authors":"Yao Tong, Jimin Wu, Xuhui Wu, Yunchang Mo, Faxing Wang","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S492040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compares the analgesic effects of the Thoracoscopic Direct-view Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block (DTPVB) with those of the Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block (UTPVB), providing a clinical reference.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Sixty-eight patients undergoing three-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with general anesthesia were randomly assigned to either the DTPVB group (Group D, n = 34) or the UTPVB group (Group U, n = 34). Both groups received a 10 mL injection of 0.75% ropivacaine at the T4 and T7 interspaces. Primary outcomes were cumulative sufentanil equivalents from the start of lung manipulation to 24 hours postoperatively, with group differences assessed against a non-inferiority margin of 5 μg (Δ). Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction, adverse effects, and other related indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative use of sufentanil equivalents from the start of lung manipulation to 24 hours postoperatively was 35.0 ± 6.1 μg in Group D and 33.2 ± 5.6 μg in Group U, with no significant difference (P = 0.217). The difference in cumulative sufentanil equivalents (Group D minus Group U) was 1.8 (95% CI -1.07, 4.65), within the non-inferiority margin of 5 (Δ). Postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption, adverse effects, and complications were similar were similar between groups. However, DTPVB was associated with lower anxiety and higher satisfaction (P<0.001). At 15 minutes post-block, ropivacaine plasma concentrations were higher in Group D (P=0.024).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DTPVB, via transmural pleural puncture, was non-inferior to UTPVB in analgesic efficacy from the beginning of the manipulation of the lungs in operation to 24h postoperatively. DTPVB provides a good alternative, especially for patients who are anxious before surgery, have difficulty cooperating with UTPVB, or in cases where UTPVB puncture fails. However, when using high concentrations of ropivacaine, greater vigilance for toxicity is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"1825-1838"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S492040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study compares the analgesic effects of the Thoracoscopic Direct-view Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block (DTPVB) with those of the Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block (UTPVB), providing a clinical reference.

Patients and methods: Sixty-eight patients undergoing three-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with general anesthesia were randomly assigned to either the DTPVB group (Group D, n = 34) or the UTPVB group (Group U, n = 34). Both groups received a 10 mL injection of 0.75% ropivacaine at the T4 and T7 interspaces. Primary outcomes were cumulative sufentanil equivalents from the start of lung manipulation to 24 hours postoperatively, with group differences assessed against a non-inferiority margin of 5 μg (Δ). Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction, adverse effects, and other related indicators.

Results: The cumulative use of sufentanil equivalents from the start of lung manipulation to 24 hours postoperatively was 35.0 ± 6.1 μg in Group D and 33.2 ± 5.6 μg in Group U, with no significant difference (P = 0.217). The difference in cumulative sufentanil equivalents (Group D minus Group U) was 1.8 (95% CI -1.07, 4.65), within the non-inferiority margin of 5 (Δ). Postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption, adverse effects, and complications were similar were similar between groups. However, DTPVB was associated with lower anxiety and higher satisfaction (P<0.001). At 15 minutes post-block, ropivacaine plasma concentrations were higher in Group D (P=0.024).

Conclusion: DTPVB, via transmural pleural puncture, was non-inferior to UTPVB in analgesic efficacy from the beginning of the manipulation of the lungs in operation to 24h postoperatively. DTPVB provides a good alternative, especially for patients who are anxious before surgery, have difficulty cooperating with UTPVB, or in cases where UTPVB puncture fails. However, when using high concentrations of ropivacaine, greater vigilance for toxicity is required.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腔镜直视与超声引导胸椎旁阻滞在多通道胸腔镜肺外科手术中的镇痛效果:一项随机对照非效性研究。
目的:比较胸腔镜直视胸椎旁神经阻滞(DTPVB)与超声引导胸椎旁神经阻滞(UTPVB)的镇痛效果,为临床提供参考。患者与方法:68例全麻下行三孔胸腔镜手术(VATS)的患者随机分为DTPVB组(D组,n = 34)和UTPVB组(U组,n = 34)。两组均在T4、T7间隙处注射0.75%罗哌卡因10 mL。主要结果是从肺操作开始到术后24小时的累积舒芬太尼当量,以非劣效裕度5 μg评估组差异(Δ)。次要结局包括术后疼痛评分、镇痛药用量、患者满意度、不良反应和其他相关指标。结果:从肺操作开始至术后24 h, D组舒芬太尼当量累积使用量为35.0±6.1 μg, U组为33.2±5.6 μg,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.217)。累积舒芬太尼当量(D组减去U组)的差异为1.8 (95% CI -1.07, 4.65),在5的非劣效范围内(Δ)。术后疼痛评分、镇痛药用量、不良反应和并发症组间相似。结论:经胸膜穿刺DTPVB从术中操作肺开始至术后24h的镇痛效果均不低于UTPVB。DTPVB提供了一个很好的选择,特别是对于术前焦虑,难以配合UTPVB,或UTPVB穿刺失败的患者。然而,当使用高浓度罗哌卡因时,需要对毒性保持更大的警惕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
期刊最新文献
Gut-Derived Hippuric Acid Alleviates Hepatic Lipid Metabolism via UGDH/FOXK1/CD36 Axis in Obese Mice. Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Combined with Dexamethasone Implant Therapy for Macular Edema: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effects of Intraoperative Esketamine-Dexmedetomidine Combination on Postpartum Depressive Symptoms and Neuropsychiatric Events Following Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Development and Validation of an HPLC-MS/MS Method for Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Tofacitinib/Simvastatin Compound Ointment in Rats. Coenzyme Q10 Impact on Ovarian Reserve Measures and the Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Outcomes in Women with Poor Ovarian Response: A Randomized Controlled Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1