Predicting Healthcare-Associated Infection in Patients with Pneumonia via QuantiFERON®-Monitoring.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection and Drug Resistance Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IDR.S499765
Taehwa Kim, Eunjeong Son, Min Wook So, Doosoo Jeon, Hye Ju Yeo, Seung Eun Lee, Yun Seong Kim
{"title":"Predicting Healthcare-Associated Infection in Patients with Pneumonia via QuantiFERON<sup>®</sup>-Monitoring.","authors":"Taehwa Kim, Eunjeong Son, Min Wook So, Doosoo Jeon, Hye Ju Yeo, Seung Eun Lee, Yun Seong Kim","doi":"10.2147/IDR.S499765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A functional immune system is essential for recovery from pneumonia; hence, measuring and monitoring immune-status indicators is clinically important. This study aimed to determine whether QuantiFERON monitoring (QMF) could predict healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) according to the immune-status of patients with pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, observational, single-center study, patients ≥19 years hospitalized for pneumonia between October 2020 and November 2021. QFM was performed at hospital admission (D1) and seven days after (D2). Data from 90 patients in the D1 QFM group were analyzed, which was further divided into the non-healthcare-associated infection (non-HCAI, n = 41, 45.6%) and HCAI (n = 49, 54.4%) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The D1 and D2 QFM levels were both significantly higher in the non-HCAI group than in the HCAI group (D1 hCAI vs non-HCAI: 4.40 vs 5.75 IU/mL, D2 hCAI vs non-HCAI: 4.38 vs 6.10 IU/mL). Analysis of the change in D1 and D2 QFM levels by each group showed that D2 QFM levels increased over D1 QFM levels in the non-HCAI group (5.75 vs 6.10 IU/mL), while D2 QFM levels decreased over D1 QFM levels in the HCAI group (4.40 vs 4.38 IU/mL). D1 QFM was consistently negatively correlated with TNF-α and CRP. The integrated analysis of D1 QFM and CCI and D1 QFM and CURB-65 had fair to predict the occurrence of HCAI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QFM can be used to predict the immune-status of patients in the context of healthcare-associated infections. These findings provide important insights into the current understanding of pneumonia treatment and recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13577,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Drug Resistance","volume":"18 ","pages":"1381-1391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S499765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A functional immune system is essential for recovery from pneumonia; hence, measuring and monitoring immune-status indicators is clinically important. This study aimed to determine whether QuantiFERON monitoring (QMF) could predict healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) according to the immune-status of patients with pneumonia.

Methods: Prospective, observational, single-center study, patients ≥19 years hospitalized for pneumonia between October 2020 and November 2021. QFM was performed at hospital admission (D1) and seven days after (D2). Data from 90 patients in the D1 QFM group were analyzed, which was further divided into the non-healthcare-associated infection (non-HCAI, n = 41, 45.6%) and HCAI (n = 49, 54.4%) groups.

Results: The D1 and D2 QFM levels were both significantly higher in the non-HCAI group than in the HCAI group (D1 hCAI vs non-HCAI: 4.40 vs 5.75 IU/mL, D2 hCAI vs non-HCAI: 4.38 vs 6.10 IU/mL). Analysis of the change in D1 and D2 QFM levels by each group showed that D2 QFM levels increased over D1 QFM levels in the non-HCAI group (5.75 vs 6.10 IU/mL), while D2 QFM levels decreased over D1 QFM levels in the HCAI group (4.40 vs 4.38 IU/mL). D1 QFM was consistently negatively correlated with TNF-α and CRP. The integrated analysis of D1 QFM and CCI and D1 QFM and CURB-65 had fair to predict the occurrence of HCAI.

Conclusion: QFM can be used to predict the immune-status of patients in the context of healthcare-associated infections. These findings provide important insights into the current understanding of pneumonia treatment and recovery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection and Drug Resistance
Infection and Drug Resistance Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: About Journal Editors Peer Reviewers Articles Article Publishing Charges Aims and Scope Call For Papers ISSN: 1178-6973 Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suresh Antony An international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the optimal treatment of infection (bacterial, fungal and viral) and the development and institution of preventative strategies to minimize the development and spread of resistance.
期刊最新文献
Major Predominant Serotypes and Virulence Genes and Antibiotic Resistance Characteristics of Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates in Middle and East China. Evaluating the Performance of Two Rapid Immunochromatographic Techniques for Detecting Carbapenemase in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Clinical Isolates. Impact of Patient-Centered Care on Treatment Outcomes of Multidrug-Resistant/Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis in Xi'an. Biomarkers for Early Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome and Differentiating It from Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome. Predicting Healthcare-Associated Infection in Patients with Pneumonia via QuantiFERON®-Monitoring.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1