Defensive Responses to Masculinity Threat: The Role of Precarious Manhood in Reactions to the Male Contraceptive Pill.

Abstract

This study examines how men evaluate a potentially masculinity-threatening message about the availability of a male birth control pill, framed as being released in the near versus distant future. Drawing on research on health-related defense mechanisms and precarious manhood, we hypothesized that men with higher levels of precarious manhood beliefs would react more defensively to the message - exhibiting greater message derogation, avoidance, lower perceived efficacy, and heightened concerns about side effects - especially when the pill was framed as being released soon. We further explored whether these defensive evaluations mediated the relationship between precarious manhood and intentions, moderated by temporal framing. To test these hypotheses, a sample of 398 men (M = 42.90, SD = 12.38) read an article describing a male birth control pill framed as either being released in the near or distant future. Participants then reported their perceptions of the article and the pill, their behavioral intentions, and their precarious manhood beliefs. Regression analyses showed that precarious manhood significantly predicted greater avoidance and higher perceptions of side effects. Moreover, higher perceived side effects mediated the association between precarious manhood and intentions to purchase the pill when it was framed as being released in the near future, but not when framed as being released in the distant future. These findings highlight the role of defensiveness in shaping how men with strong precarious manhood beliefs respond to masculinity-threatening health messages. Careful consideration of message framing, particularly in media presentations of male contraceptives, is crucial to mitigate defensive reactions that could hinder desired behavioral outcomes.