Prioritization of methods for assessing alcohol use in emergency room settings: findings from a qualitative study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health policy and planning Pub Date : 2025-05-09 DOI:10.1093/heapol/czaf016
Petal Petersen Williams, Megan Prinsloo, Jodilee Erasmus, Charles Dh Parry, Richard Matzopoulos, Margaret M Peden
{"title":"Prioritization of methods for assessing alcohol use in emergency room settings: findings from a qualitative study.","authors":"Petal Petersen Williams, Megan Prinsloo, Jodilee Erasmus, Charles Dh Parry, Richard Matzopoulos, Margaret M Peden","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Limited alcohol-related injury data in hospital settings globally underscore the need for routine monitoring to inform policy formulation for injury prevention, especially in addressing violence and road traffic injuries. COVID-19 and the related alcohol sales bans in South Africa in 2020-21 brought the impact of alcohol on trauma presenting to health facilities into sharp focus and highlighted the absence of practical, cost-effective, and accurate alcohol diagnostic tools in emergency rooms This qualitative study aims to identify valuable alcohol-related information for stakeholders to inform a validation study of alcohol diagnostics for injury-related trauma. We conducted five virtual focus group discussions (FGDs) with four groups of stakeholders: clinicians (n = 9), academics (n = 4), hospital and other operational staff (n = 6), and policymakers (n = 4). FGDs were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Coding and thematic analyses were conducted using NVivo version 12. Results highlighted the belief that alcohol places a burden on the healthcare system and plays a significant role in injury causation and mortality. Currently, robust alcohol assessment in emergency rooms is lacking. Despite acknowledging that quantified blood alcohol levels would not change acute clinical management, there was consensus regarding the need-to-know patients' alcohol usage to inform long-term management and broader public health objectives. Findings support plans to validate the efficacy of selected alcohol diagnostic tools in public hospital settings and to further test their feasibility and utility at a national level.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"548-555"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited alcohol-related injury data in hospital settings globally underscore the need for routine monitoring to inform policy formulation for injury prevention, especially in addressing violence and road traffic injuries. COVID-19 and the related alcohol sales bans in South Africa in 2020-21 brought the impact of alcohol on trauma presenting to health facilities into sharp focus and highlighted the absence of practical, cost-effective, and accurate alcohol diagnostic tools in emergency rooms This qualitative study aims to identify valuable alcohol-related information for stakeholders to inform a validation study of alcohol diagnostics for injury-related trauma. We conducted five virtual focus group discussions (FGDs) with four groups of stakeholders: clinicians (n = 9), academics (n = 4), hospital and other operational staff (n = 6), and policymakers (n = 4). FGDs were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Coding and thematic analyses were conducted using NVivo version 12. Results highlighted the belief that alcohol places a burden on the healthcare system and plays a significant role in injury causation and mortality. Currently, robust alcohol assessment in emergency rooms is lacking. Despite acknowledging that quantified blood alcohol levels would not change acute clinical management, there was consensus regarding the need-to-know patients' alcohol usage to inform long-term management and broader public health objectives. Findings support plans to validate the efficacy of selected alcohol diagnostic tools in public hospital settings and to further test their feasibility and utility at a national level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊室酒精使用评估方法的优先顺序:一项定性研究的结果。
全球医院环境中与酒精有关的伤害数据有限,这突显出需要进行常规监测,为制定伤害预防政策提供信息,特别是在处理暴力和道路交通伤害方面。2019冠状病毒病以及南非2020-2021年相关的酒精销售禁令,使酒精对卫生机构出现的创伤的影响成为人们关注的焦点,并突显了急诊室缺乏实用、具有成本效益和准确的酒精诊断工具。本定性研究旨在为利益相关者确定有价值的酒精相关信息,以告知损伤相关创伤的酒精诊断的验证研究。我们与四组利益相关者进行了五次虚拟焦点小组讨论(fgd):临床医生(n=9)、学者(n=4)、医院和其他业务人员(n=6)以及政策制定者(n=4)。FGDs被录音并逐字转录。使用NVivo version 12进行编码和专题分析。结果强调,酒精给医疗保健系统带来了负担,并在造成伤害和死亡方面起着重要作用。目前,急诊室缺乏强有力的酒精评估。尽管承认量化血液酒精水平不会改变急性临床管理,但人们一致认为需要了解患者的酒精使用情况,以便为长期管理和更广泛的公共卫生目标提供信息。研究结果支持在公立医院环境中验证选定的酒精诊断工具的有效性,并进一步测试其在国家层面上的可行性和实用性的计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
期刊最新文献
Power, interests, and maternal health care: a political economy analysis of service delivery redesign in Kenya. Health systems resilience and private for-profit sector engagement: lessons from the second COVID-19 wave in Uttar Pradesh, India. Sustaining health systems in sub-Saharan Africa: public-private partnerships in a new era of reduced donor funding. Can co-designing interventions with affected communities help prevent violence against women? Findings from a process evaluation of the E le Saua le Alofa (Love Shouldn't Hurt) pilot in Samoa. One size does not fit all: income-sensitive thresholds for catastrophic health expenditure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1