Designing Gender-Responsive Health Promotion Programs for Men: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Education & Behavior Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1177/10901981251322391
Paul Sharp, Caitlin Sankey, John L Oliffe, Nico Schulenkorf, Cristina M Caperchione
{"title":"Designing Gender-Responsive Health Promotion Programs for Men: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Paul Sharp, Caitlin Sankey, John L Oliffe, Nico Schulenkorf, Cristina M Caperchione","doi":"10.1177/10901981251322391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past decade, there has been an increased emphasis on tailoring men's health promotion programs. To optimize outcomes, participatory action research that involves and elicits feedback from end-users has been highlighted as important to creating gender-responsive interventions. In this scoping review, we examine (a) how participatory action research has been used to design health promotion interventions for men and (b) what constitutes a gender-responsive intervention design. Following a comprehensive search, 53 articles were included in the review, reporting on 35 men's health promotion programs. Our findings suggest that participatory action methods harness varying degrees of end-user involvement, with a large majority limited to post-intervention evaluations rather than co-design and consumer collaboration. In addition, there are inconsistencies for applying gender-responsive approaches within programs, particularly regarding how interventions are targeted, tailored, and promoted to men. We conclude that participatory action research methods translate to varying degrees of gender responsiveness in men's health promotion programs. That said, involving end-users at various stages of intervention design, implementation, and evaluation may increase the likelihood that programs are more attuned to masculinities and better engage participants in promoting healthy behavior change. Efforts to advance gender-responsive designs can benefit from inductively deriving and incorporating men's masculine values.</p>","PeriodicalId":12974,"journal":{"name":"Health Education & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"439-468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246503/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981251322391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been an increased emphasis on tailoring men's health promotion programs. To optimize outcomes, participatory action research that involves and elicits feedback from end-users has been highlighted as important to creating gender-responsive interventions. In this scoping review, we examine (a) how participatory action research has been used to design health promotion interventions for men and (b) what constitutes a gender-responsive intervention design. Following a comprehensive search, 53 articles were included in the review, reporting on 35 men's health promotion programs. Our findings suggest that participatory action methods harness varying degrees of end-user involvement, with a large majority limited to post-intervention evaluations rather than co-design and consumer collaboration. In addition, there are inconsistencies for applying gender-responsive approaches within programs, particularly regarding how interventions are targeted, tailored, and promoted to men. We conclude that participatory action research methods translate to varying degrees of gender responsiveness in men's health promotion programs. That said, involving end-users at various stages of intervention design, implementation, and evaluation may increase the likelihood that programs are more attuned to masculinities and better engage participants in promoting healthy behavior change. Efforts to advance gender-responsive designs can benefit from inductively deriving and incorporating men's masculine values.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为男性设计性别敏感的健康促进计划:范围审查》。
在过去的十年里,人们越来越重视量身定制的男性健康促进计划。为了优化成果,强调了涉及最终用户并得到最终用户反馈的参与性行动研究对于创建促进性别平等的干预措施非常重要。在这一范围审查中,我们检查(a)如何使用参与性行动研究来设计促进男性健康的干预措施,以及(b)什么是促进性别平等的干预措施设计。经过全面的搜索,该综述纳入了53篇文章,报告了35个男性健康促进项目。我们的研究结果表明,参与式行动方法利用了不同程度的终端用户参与,其中绝大多数仅限于干预后评估,而不是共同设计和消费者协作。此外,在项目中应用促进性别平等的方法也存在不一致之处,特别是在干预措施如何有针对性、量身定制和向男性推广方面。我们的结论是,参与式行动研究方法转化为不同程度的男性健康促进计划的性别反应。也就是说,让终端用户参与干预设计、实施和评估的各个阶段,可能会增加项目更适合男性的可能性,并更好地吸引参与者促进健康的行为改变。促进促进性别平等的设计的努力可以从归纳得出和纳入男子的男性价值观中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Education & Behavior
Health Education & Behavior PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Health Education & Behavior is the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE). The journal publishes authoritative and practical information on critical health issues for a broad range of professionals interested in understanding factors associated with health behavior and health status, and strategies to improve social and behavioral health. The journal is interested in articles directed toward researchers and/or practitioners in health behavior and health education. Empirical research, case study, program evaluation, literature reviews, and articles discussing theories are regularly published.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Impact of a Community-Based Narrative Film about Diabetes and Homelessness. Effects of a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education Campaign on Campaign Awareness, Message Recall, and Behavior. Reactions to Sexual, Substance Use, and Mental Health Surveys Among Rural Sexual Minority Men. Gynecologic Cancer Screening: Understanding Barriers Through Social Cognitive Theory and Health Belief Model. Pro-Vax, Anti-Vax, or Shades of Gray? Segmenting Consumers Based on Attitudes to Vaccination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1