Health Education & Behavior最新文献

Similar to national trends, in Illinois, fatal opioid overdoses have risen. Black men (35+) outrank all other racial subgroups for the highest rate of fatal opioid overdoses in the state. To address this, Prevention First and the Illinois Department of Human Services developed a public health education campaign to support increasing enrollment in recovery services, with a focus on Black men (35+). Self-reported Black participants with opioid use disorder (OUD) made up the analytic sample. Study goals were to understand lived experiences of the campaign audience; investigate knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding OUD and treatment; explore perceived barriers and facilitators to treatment; and evaluate messaging that showcased medication-assisted recovery (MAR) as a viable tool for treatment and recovery. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis. Participants shared long and cyclical journeys of use and recovery. Participants had low levels of knowledge of available treatment options and struggled to imagine themselves in recovery because of the fear of cravings and withdrawal. Messaging that was realistic about the cyclical nature of recovery, showed the varying options for MAR, and addressed cravings and withdrawals were well received. These findings illustrate the importance of understanding an audience and involving them in campaign development to create messaging that promotes behavior change and sustained health. Through the Decision Blocks strategic framework, we discovered information gaps, barriers to treatment, and practical solutions to increase access to treatment for Black men with OUD that has been limited due to inequities caused by structural racism.

Elective genetic testing (EGT) programs that provide pharmacogenomic information to guide medication management and screen for medically actionable disease predispositions are emerging in a number of health systems. Primary care providers (PCPs) are at the forefront of test initiation, patient education, and management of EGT results. However, little research has examined the experiences of PCPs in health systems offering clinical EGT. We conducted semi-structured interviews, a sub-study of the larger mixed-methods Imagenetics Initiative, with 16 PCPs at a health system in the Midwest with a clinical EGT program supported by provider education, automated clinical decision support, and enhanced access to genetic specialists. The purpose of these interviews was to understand perceptions about the benefits and barriers of implementing EGT in clinical practice. Thematic analysis indicated that EGT is conceptualized similar to traditional diagnostic services. PCPs were generally favorable toward EGT; however, targeted education did not dispel misconceptions about the goals, results, and limitations of EGT. Most PCPs endorsed the potential utility of EGT. Pharmacogenomic profiling was seen as having more immediate impact for patients than screening for monogenic disease risks. PCPs reported that they weighed discussions about EGT against time limitations and the need to prioritize patients' existing health concerns. Regardless of their education levels and familiarity with genetics, PCPs desired additional educational resources and greater access to genetic specialists. Our study provides unique insight into PCPs' experiences with clinical EGT in health systems that have adopted EGT and highlights the practical challenges and potential opportunities of EGT integration.

With health equity growing as a priority within health care, health systems must transform that calling into action within their social, economic, and political environments. The current literature has not compared how different organizations manage the same health disparities intervention. This qualitative study aims to illustrate how different organizations navigated the implementation and sustainability of a hypertension disparities intervention by comparing experiences across Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), a private health system, and other non-clinical partnering organizations. As a study within a randomized controlled trial designed to reduce disparities in hypertension care, we conducted interviews with health care leaders before and after participation in the trial's multi-level intervention. Before participation, we interviewed five health care leaders representing five health systems. Following the intervention, we interviewed 14 leaders representing the five health systems and two partnering organizations. Discussions focused on intervention implementation and plans for sustainability. The primary considerations in implementation were appropriate staffing and multi-level organizational buy-in. When discussing long-term planning, health systems prioritized the structure of a stepped-care protocol incorporating community health workers (CHWs) and case managers. The sustainability of the CHW intervention at FQHCs was dependent on funding, whereas a private, non-FQHC physician practice network focused on expanding current resources for more patients. These findings serve as anticipatory guidance for organizations aiming to reduce hypertension disparities and provide support for policies that financially assist these interventions. Further investigation is warranted on the organizational factors that may influence the degree of success in eliminating health care disparities.

To unpack the process of how health information seeking influences health behaviors, we examined the mediating roles of interpersonal discussion and online information sharing in the associations between health information seeking and healthy lifestyle behaviors and the moderating role of health literacy in the associations among health information seeking, interpersonal discussion, online information sharing, and healthy lifestyle behaviors. Data from a large-scale, representative survey (N = 916) revealed that interpersonal discussion and online information sharing mediated the associations between health information seeking and healthy lifestyle behaviors. The associations between health information seeking and interpersonal discussion and between health information seeking and online information sharing were stronger for individuals with high health literacy than those with low health literacy. Findings advance the understanding of the influence of health information seeking and provide practical guidance for promoting a healthy lifestyle.

There are many individual and societal benefits to screen older adults for memory problems. Four theoretically derived psychosocial factors are predictive of dementia screening intention: perceived benefits, perceived susceptibility, self-efficacy, and knowledge about memory. The current study tested whether these factors could be modified with an educational memory screening intervention given in community senior centers. An educational presentation was designed to address these factors by increasing knowledge about memory and aging, discussing the benefits of screening and older adults' susceptibility to memory issues, and increasing self-efficacy by teaching about the memory screening process, discussing a vignette, and fielding participants' questions. The educational presentation was offered four times at three community senior centers. Quantitative data on the psychosocial factors were collected before and after the presentation from 44 older adult participants (age M = 78.70, SD = 7.21). Narrative data on satisfaction and feedback about the intervention were collected. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses were performed to measure change from pre- to post-presentation and follow-up 1 to 2 weeks after the intervention. The educational presentation effectively increased knowledge about aging memory, perceived benefits of screenings, and self-efficacy to seek screening. The presentation intervention was well received by community participants. Results provide guidance about how an intervention based in community senior centers can be refined to address factors predictive of memory screening intention in older adults.

The far-reaching impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Latinx communities is well-documented. This population has higher rates of COVID-19 infection and death compared with non-Latinx White Americans mainly due to long-standing problems related to Social Determinants of Health. Communication about issues such as health threats and safety measures are a vital part of public health, and need to be appropriate to the population of focus. To understand the effectiveness of public health communication to Latinx communities in Michigan during the COVID-19 pandemic, semi-structured interviews (n = 16) and three focus groups (n = 24 participants) were conducted virtually in 2021 across counties in Michigan deeply impacted by COVID-19: Washtenaw, Kent, Genesee, and Wayne. Participants shared some facilitating factors that supported effective health communication during the pandemic for their communities. For instance, in their experiences, religious and community leaders were especially effective in communicating information about the pandemic. They also expressed issues with English often being the only language of official communication; the need for bilingual options; and, the need for multiple channels of communication to reach as many people as possible. Participants also highlighted their concerns about inconsistent government communication and politicizing messages as a hindering factor that impacted effective health communication within their communities. Lessons from successes and failures experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic are vital to improving health outcomes for marginalized communities during public health crises. Future responses must ensure that public health communication is appropriate and effective for Latinx communities to better protect them.

As we stand at the cusp of a transformative era in scholarly publishing, it is with great anticipation and excitement that we announce Health Education & Behavior (HE&B) will transition to an exclusively online format starting in 2025. This decision aligns with our commitment to sustainability, accessibility, and leveraging digital advancements to enhance the dissemination of vital public health research.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) developed a public education campaign, The Real Cost, that reduced youth susceptibility to tobacco product use. We sought to identify the mechanisms that may underlie the impact of The Real Cost ads on susceptibility to vaping to inform youth tobacco prevention campaigns. Our online randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04836455) examined a large sample of U.S. adolescents (n = 1,348) who had multiple exposures to Real Cost ads or control videos over a 3-week period in 2021. To examine potential mediating pathways between The Real Cost ads and susceptibility to vaping, we examined theory-based psychosocial and message-related variables. The largest impact of The Real Cost ads on susceptibility was via more negative attitudes toward vaping (β_a*β_b = -0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [-0.25, -0.06]). Other mediation paths were via improved health harm risk beliefs (β_a*β_b = -0.08; 95% CI = [-0.13, -0.04]), addiction risk beliefs (β_a*β_b = -0.04; 95% CI = [-0.06, -0.01]), injunctive norms against vaping (β_a*β_b = -0.05; 95% CI = [-0.09, -0.02]), negative affect (β_a*β_b = -0.05; 95% CI = [-0.08, -0.02]), and cognitive elaboration (β_a*β_b = -0.03; 95% CI = [-0.05, -0.003]). Our findings suggest that ads that target negative attitudes may decrease susceptibility to vaping among youth. Our findings also introduce normative pressure as a novel factor that may be important for vaping prevention messages.

Background: Concussion education is recommended to increase concussion knowledge, beliefs, and reporting intentions. The Concussion Awareness Training Tool for Youth (CATT-Youth) is a 40-minute e-Learning module developed for high school-aged youth.

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate changes in concussion knowledge, beliefs, and reporting intentions in high school youth from Calgary, Canada, following completion of the CATT-Youth.

Methods: This study used a modified stepped-wedge trial design. High school classes were randomly assigned to an intervention (Ix) or delayed intervention (DIx) group. Ix group participants completed a pre-CATT survey immediately followed by the CATT-Youth, then a post-CATT survey 2 to 6 weeks later. DIx group participants completed two pre-CATT surveys 2 to 6 weeks apart, with the CATT-Youth completed immediately following the second pre-CATT, then a post-CATT survey 2 to 6 weeks later. The pre-/post-CATT survey encompassed 11 subtests evaluating concussion knowledge, beliefs, and reporting intentions. Independent mixed linear regression models were conducted to examine changes in scores for each subtest.

Results: Participants included 454 high school students: five Ix schools (16 classes, n = 323) and two DIx schools (six classes, n = 131). The CATT-Youth significantly increased general concussion knowledge, Ix δ = 0.546/8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.243, 0.849]), DIx δ = 0.728/8 (95% CI = [0.389, 1.106]), and beliefs about capabilities, Ix δ = 2.462/28 (95% CI = [1.086, 3.838]), DIx δ = 3.219/28 (95% CI = [1.594, 4.844]) for both groups. For some subtests, improvements were noted in the DIx group only.

Conclusion: The CATT-Youth module improved concussion knowledge and beliefs about capabilities for students in both groups. Future studies should explore the utility of the CATT-Youth in changing knowledge, beliefs, and reporting intentions in high school students.

Growing up in socioeconomic disadvantage increases risk of peer bullying at school. Both socioeconomic status and involvement in bullying are predictive of a range of adverse developmental outcomes. However, neither (a) the mechanisms whereby disadvantage increases bullying risk nor (b) the developmental outcomes for which bullying may mediate disadvantage are clear. This review scoped the literature on the relationships between socioeconomic disadvantage, bullying, and health and developmental outcomes for school-aged children and adolescents. Four databases were searched up to June 3, 2023 with 565 studies retrieved, of which 17 met criteria. Most studies were cross-sectional, and studies varied greatly in their definition and measurement of both bullying involvement and disadvantage. No intervention studies were found. Mediators of the disadvantage-bullying association ranged from individual level (e.g., depression) to the national level (e.g., homicide rate); only two studies examined bully-victim status. Of studies where bullying was a mediator, none examined bullying perpetration; the range of outcomes examined was narrowly focused on mental health, failing to capture the full range of developmental outcomes associated with either socioeconomic disadvantage or bullying involvement. This review highlights that future research is needed on identifying and understanding the mediators of the association between disadvantage and bullying victimization, and on the developmental outcomes mediated by bullying perpetration for disadvantaged children. These insights are critical to increase the effectiveness of community- and school-based bullying prevention, particularly in communities with high proportions of socioeconomically disadvantaged families.