Kim Martin, Christos Katsaros, Robert Brylka, Ulrich Schwanecke, Ralf Schulze
{"title":"Influence of patient motion on definition of typical cephalometric reference points in digital horizontally scanning cephalometric radiography.","authors":"Kim Martin, Christos Katsaros, Robert Brylka, Ulrich Schwanecke, Ralf Schulze","doi":"10.1186/s13005-025-00491-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of defined head-motion during x-ray exposure on the identification accuracy of typical cephalometric reference points which form the basis of treatment planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By means of a dry adult human skull and a precise motion simulation system digital Cephs are acquired while certain predefined movement patterns (shift, tilt and nodding with a motion amplitude from 5 - 50 mm) of the skull were executed. They represent the movements of children and adolescents, the main group for cephalometric radiographs.The scanning time was 9.4 s per Ceph. 10 typical landmark points of cephalometric analysis were identified by 20 observers on each Ceph twice. Using a non-motion image (Ceph0) as reference, displacement was computed as vectors relative to this image. Commonly used angles and vertical and horizontal distances were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both inter-rater as well as intra-rater-reproducibility were perfect. There was very little change in the vertical distance N-Me, in contrast to the horizontal distance S-N which showed a large variation. So patient motion parallel to the scanning direction of the fan-beam-detector unit, heavily influence distances parallel to this direction. The ANB angle and the Maxillo-Mandibular Plane Angle (ANS-PNS to Me-Go) only varied by about 1-2°, but large enough to greatly influence a treatment plan.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study observed a severe influence on reference point location of motion patterns parallel to the scanning direction and also on clinically relevant distances parallel to the scanning direction. Therefore, we recommend to use a horizontal scanning direction, to minimise scanning time to a minimum, or to prefer a one-shot technique if possible. Future advancements in this field may include the integration of artificial intelligence or algorithms for the purpose of motion correction.</p>","PeriodicalId":12994,"journal":{"name":"Head & Face Medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Face Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-025-00491-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of defined head-motion during x-ray exposure on the identification accuracy of typical cephalometric reference points which form the basis of treatment planning.
Methods: By means of a dry adult human skull and a precise motion simulation system digital Cephs are acquired while certain predefined movement patterns (shift, tilt and nodding with a motion amplitude from 5 - 50 mm) of the skull were executed. They represent the movements of children and adolescents, the main group for cephalometric radiographs.The scanning time was 9.4 s per Ceph. 10 typical landmark points of cephalometric analysis were identified by 20 observers on each Ceph twice. Using a non-motion image (Ceph0) as reference, displacement was computed as vectors relative to this image. Commonly used angles and vertical and horizontal distances were calculated.
Results: Both inter-rater as well as intra-rater-reproducibility were perfect. There was very little change in the vertical distance N-Me, in contrast to the horizontal distance S-N which showed a large variation. So patient motion parallel to the scanning direction of the fan-beam-detector unit, heavily influence distances parallel to this direction. The ANB angle and the Maxillo-Mandibular Plane Angle (ANS-PNS to Me-Go) only varied by about 1-2°, but large enough to greatly influence a treatment plan.
Conclusions: The study observed a severe influence on reference point location of motion patterns parallel to the scanning direction and also on clinically relevant distances parallel to the scanning direction. Therefore, we recommend to use a horizontal scanning direction, to minimise scanning time to a minimum, or to prefer a one-shot technique if possible. Future advancements in this field may include the integration of artificial intelligence or algorithms for the purpose of motion correction.
期刊介绍:
Head & Face Medicine is a multidisciplinary open access journal that publishes basic and clinical research concerning all aspects of cranial, facial and oral conditions.
The journal covers all aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. It has been designed as a multidisciplinary journal for clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of diseases which affect the human head and face. The journal is wide-ranging, covering the development, aetiology, epidemiology and therapy of head and face diseases to the basic science that underlies these diseases. Management of head and face diseases includes all aspects of surgical and non-surgical treatments including psychopharmacological therapies.