Impact of Embedded Interdisciplinary Heart Failure Teams on Achieving Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Within Community-Based Cardiology Practices.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiac Failure Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.01.029
Jessica Bregier, Rebekah Krupski, Stormi Gale, Alica Sparling, Mary Ellen Pisano, Maryann Choy-Ames, Jessica Cheuvront, Rowan Spence, Gordon R Reeves
{"title":"Impact of Embedded Interdisciplinary Heart Failure Teams on Achieving Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Within Community-Based Cardiology Practices.","authors":"Jessica Bregier, Rebekah Krupski, Stormi Gale, Alica Sparling, Mary Ellen Pisano, Maryann Choy-Ames, Jessica Cheuvront, Rowan Spence, Gordon R Reeves","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.01.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is under-prescribed. Real-world data regarding contemporary GDMT prescribing and the impact of scalable interdisciplinary heart failure (HF) teams are needed.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively identified n=2,121 patients with HFrEF seen in 2022 among four community-based cardiology practice sites that contained an embedded interdisciplinary HF team. After excluding n=203 patients with missing data or encounters, GDMT prescribing was compared among those with (n=1,029) and without (n=889) the support of the interdisciplinary HF teams. Patients were 33% female, 34% Black/African American, with average age of 69 years. Patients seen by interdisciplinary HF teams achieved more comprehensive GDMT regimens compared to patients receiving routine care alone, as shown by higher 4-Pillar Intensification Scores (6.5 vs 4.7; p<0.001). Using multivariable logistic regression models, patients whose care included an interdisciplinary HF team had higher odds (OR; 95% CI) of receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors [SGLT2is] (3.08; 2.37-3.99), angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor [ARNi] (1.84; 1.45-2.35), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists [MRAs] (1.41; 1.11-1.8) than patients receiving routine care alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access to embedded interdisciplinary HF teams within community cardiology practices was associated with improved GDMT prescribing, supporting broader adoption of interdisciplinary care models for optimizing GDMT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.01.029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is under-prescribed. Real-world data regarding contemporary GDMT prescribing and the impact of scalable interdisciplinary heart failure (HF) teams are needed.

Methods and results: We retrospectively identified n=2,121 patients with HFrEF seen in 2022 among four community-based cardiology practice sites that contained an embedded interdisciplinary HF team. After excluding n=203 patients with missing data or encounters, GDMT prescribing was compared among those with (n=1,029) and without (n=889) the support of the interdisciplinary HF teams. Patients were 33% female, 34% Black/African American, with average age of 69 years. Patients seen by interdisciplinary HF teams achieved more comprehensive GDMT regimens compared to patients receiving routine care alone, as shown by higher 4-Pillar Intensification Scores (6.5 vs 4.7; p<0.001). Using multivariable logistic regression models, patients whose care included an interdisciplinary HF team had higher odds (OR; 95% CI) of receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors [SGLT2is] (3.08; 2.37-3.99), angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor [ARNi] (1.84; 1.45-2.35), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists [MRAs] (1.41; 1.11-1.8) than patients receiving routine care alone.

Conclusions: Access to embedded interdisciplinary HF teams within community cardiology practices was associated with improved GDMT prescribing, supporting broader adoption of interdisciplinary care models for optimizing GDMT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Embedded Interdisciplinary Heart Failure Teams on Achieving Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Within Community-Based Cardiology Practices. Patient Focus: Teamwork to make the heart work: An explanation of "Impact of Embedded Interdisciplinary Heart Failure Teams on Achieving Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Within Community-Based Cardiology Practices''. Activation of neutrophil extracellular trap formation in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction. Weighing the Benefits of Wearable Devices in Heart Failure Trials. Lessons Learned from Two Research Studies Enrolling Underrepresented Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices and their Family Caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1