Admission Pattern After Half a Decade of Implementation of MHCA, 2017: Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Southern India.

Darshanam Veerendra, Prasanna Kumar Neredumilli, Shiva Shanker Reddy Mukku
{"title":"Admission Pattern After Half a Decade of Implementation of MHCA, 2017: Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Southern India.","authors":"Darshanam Veerendra, Prasanna Kumar Neredumilli, Shiva Shanker Reddy Mukku","doi":"10.1177/02537176251323561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many laws and acts related to mental health play a vital role in delivery of mental health services for persons with mental illness (PMI). In India, the Mental Health Act of 1987 (MHA, 1987) was replaced with the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 (MHCA, 2017). However, there were numerous barriers and challenges in the proper implementation of the Act, and there is a paucity of research on the extent of implementation of the new Act. This study assessed the admission patterns of PMI admitted during the transition phase from MHA, 1987 to MHCA, 2017.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was done on admissions through the Hon'ble Magistrate's orders and mentally ill prisoners at a tertiary care psychiatric hospital in first four years (2018-2022) after MHCA enactment. Details regarding the admission, legal variables, and clinical variables were taken from case records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 354 patients, including 222 (62.7%) admissions through the Hon'ble Magistrate's orders and 132 (37.3%) mentally ill prisoners. Paranoid schizophrenia (<i>n</i> = 162, 52.9%) was the most common diagnosis and modified electroconvulsive therapy was given to 36% (<i>n</i> = 120) of patients. Total 115 (52%) patients were admitted under MHA, 1987, and 38 (17%) were admitted under MHCA, 2017, and no Act was mentioned in the case of 68 patients (30.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the extent of change in admissions of PMI after MHCA, 2017 enactment and sheds light on probable barriers for delay in the proper implementation of the Act. Our study emphasized the need for awareness about MHCA for all stakeholders as adherence to the proper procedure is necessary while admitting patients in closed wards and prison wards of the psychiatric facility.</p>","PeriodicalId":13476,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"02537176251323561"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176251323561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many laws and acts related to mental health play a vital role in delivery of mental health services for persons with mental illness (PMI). In India, the Mental Health Act of 1987 (MHA, 1987) was replaced with the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 (MHCA, 2017). However, there were numerous barriers and challenges in the proper implementation of the Act, and there is a paucity of research on the extent of implementation of the new Act. This study assessed the admission patterns of PMI admitted during the transition phase from MHA, 1987 to MHCA, 2017.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was done on admissions through the Hon'ble Magistrate's orders and mentally ill prisoners at a tertiary care psychiatric hospital in first four years (2018-2022) after MHCA enactment. Details regarding the admission, legal variables, and clinical variables were taken from case records.

Results: Our study included 354 patients, including 222 (62.7%) admissions through the Hon'ble Magistrate's orders and 132 (37.3%) mentally ill prisoners. Paranoid schizophrenia (n = 162, 52.9%) was the most common diagnosis and modified electroconvulsive therapy was given to 36% (n = 120) of patients. Total 115 (52%) patients were admitted under MHA, 1987, and 38 (17%) were admitted under MHCA, 2017, and no Act was mentioned in the case of 68 patients (30.6%).

Conclusions: This study highlights the extent of change in admissions of PMI after MHCA, 2017 enactment and sheds light on probable barriers for delay in the proper implementation of the Act. Our study emphasized the need for awareness about MHCA for all stakeholders as adherence to the proper procedure is necessary while admitting patients in closed wards and prison wards of the psychiatric facility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2017 年 MHCA 实施半载后的入院模式:印度南部一家三级医院的经验。
背景:许多与精神卫生有关的法律和行为在为精神疾病患者提供精神卫生服务方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在印度,《1987年精神卫生法》(MHA, 1987)被《2017年精神保健法》(MHCA, 2017)所取代。然而,该法案的正确实施存在诸多障碍和挑战,对新法案的实施程度缺乏研究。本研究评估了1987年mhha到2017年MHCA过渡阶段的PMI入院模式。方法:回顾性分析MHCA颁布后的前四年(2018-2022年),一家三级精神病院通过Hon'ble裁判官命令和精神疾病囚犯的入院情况。有关入院、法律变量和临床变量的详细信息取自病例记录。结果:本研究纳入354例患者,其中222例(62.7%)通过Hon’ble裁判官命令入院,132例(37.3%)患有精神疾病的囚犯。偏执型精神分裂症(n = 162, 52.9%)是最常见的诊断,36% (n = 120)的患者接受了改良电休克治疗。1987年MHA共收治115例(52%)患者,2017年MHCA共收治38例(17%)患者,68例(30.6%)患者未提及法案。结论:本研究强调了2017年MHCA颁布后PMI准入的变化程度,并揭示了延迟正确实施该法案的可能障碍。我们的研究强调了所有利益相关者对MHCA的认识的必要性,因为在精神病设施的封闭病房和监狱病房接纳患者时,遵守适当的程序是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (ISSN 0253-7176) was started in 1978 as the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society South Zonal Branch. The journal allows free access (Open Access) and is published Bimonthly. The Journal includes but is not limited to review articles, original research, opinions, and letters. The Editor and publisher accept no legal responsibility for any opinions, omissions or errors by the authors, nor do they approve of any product advertised within the journal.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Mental Health Literacy and Help-seeking Attitude Among the General Population: Insights from a Pilot Study. Acknowledgment in the Scientific Literature: An Overlooked Record of Collaboration. Between Care and Commerce: A Call for Ethical and Regulatory Accountability for Private Rehabilitation Centers in Northeast India. A Cross-sectional Case-control Study on Metacognition, Neurocognitive Functions, and Quality of Life Among Older Adults with Depressive Disorder. Psychosocial Support for Siblings of Individuals with Autism: Insights from a Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1