Endoscopic plantar fascia release via dual medial deep fascia approach for refractory plantar fasciitis: an effective, safe, and rapid surgical approach.
Jianing Yu, Jinxi An, Sen Wang, Wei Liu, Ziheng Bu, Junchao Huang, Peng Wang, Tao Zhu, Peng Wu, Min Zhu
{"title":"Endoscopic plantar fascia release via dual medial deep fascia approach for refractory plantar fasciitis: an effective, safe, and rapid surgical approach.","authors":"Jianing Yu, Jinxi An, Sen Wang, Wei Liu, Ziheng Bu, Junchao Huang, Peng Wang, Tao Zhu, Peng Wu, Min Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s00264-025-06499-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic plantar fascia release through the modified dual medial deep fascia approach for the treatment of refractory plantar fasciitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted involving 34 patients with refractory plantar fasciitis treated by endoscopic plantar fascia release through the modified dual medial deep fascia approach. Among them, 25 patients had concurrent calcaneal spurs. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, while structural evaluations included the Medial Longitudinal Arch Angle (MLAA), navicular tuberosity height-to-foot length ratio (NH/FL), and the Arch Index (AI). Differences between patients with and without calcaneal spurs were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed at least 12 months of follow-up, with primary wound healing in all cases. Two patients experienced transient plantar skin numbness and small toe abduction difficulty, which resolved within three months. The VAS score decreased significantly from 6.53 ± 1.19 preoperatively to 1.18 ± 0.76 postoperatively, and the AOFAS score improved from 52.41 ± 5.23 to 93.29 ± 3.91 (both P < 0.05), indicating statistical significance. However, changes in the MLAA, NH/FL and AI were not statistically significant. Apart from age differences (49.04 ± 4.41 vs. 34.56 ± 3.13), no significant differences in other scores were observed between the calcaneal spur group and the non-calcaneal spur group at the final follow-up. Moreover, compared to the methods reported in other studies, our study demonstrated a shorter operative time and superior pain and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dual medial deep fascia approach for endoscopic plantar fascia release is a safe, quick, effective, and minimally invasive technique that yields favourable clinical outcomes. It has certain advantages compared to other techniques. The presence of calcaneal spurs does not impact postoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-025-06499-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic plantar fascia release through the modified dual medial deep fascia approach for the treatment of refractory plantar fasciitis.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted involving 34 patients with refractory plantar fasciitis treated by endoscopic plantar fascia release through the modified dual medial deep fascia approach. Among them, 25 patients had concurrent calcaneal spurs. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, while structural evaluations included the Medial Longitudinal Arch Angle (MLAA), navicular tuberosity height-to-foot length ratio (NH/FL), and the Arch Index (AI). Differences between patients with and without calcaneal spurs were also analyzed.
Results: All patients completed at least 12 months of follow-up, with primary wound healing in all cases. Two patients experienced transient plantar skin numbness and small toe abduction difficulty, which resolved within three months. The VAS score decreased significantly from 6.53 ± 1.19 preoperatively to 1.18 ± 0.76 postoperatively, and the AOFAS score improved from 52.41 ± 5.23 to 93.29 ± 3.91 (both P < 0.05), indicating statistical significance. However, changes in the MLAA, NH/FL and AI were not statistically significant. Apart from age differences (49.04 ± 4.41 vs. 34.56 ± 3.13), no significant differences in other scores were observed between the calcaneal spur group and the non-calcaneal spur group at the final follow-up. Moreover, compared to the methods reported in other studies, our study demonstrated a shorter operative time and superior pain and functional outcomes.
Conclusion: The dual medial deep fascia approach for endoscopic plantar fascia release is a safe, quick, effective, and minimally invasive technique that yields favourable clinical outcomes. It has certain advantages compared to other techniques. The presence of calcaneal spurs does not impact postoperative outcomes.
期刊介绍:
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.