Introduction of the Low Voltage Bridge Mapping for the AVNRT RF Ablation in Children - Early Follow-Up Results.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1111/jce.16635
Tomasz M Książczyk, Radosław Pietrzak, Klaudia Obsznajczyk, Magda Franke, Bożena Werner
{"title":"Introduction of the Low Voltage Bridge Mapping for the AVNRT RF Ablation in Children - Early Follow-Up Results.","authors":"Tomasz M Książczyk, Radosław Pietrzak, Klaudia Obsznajczyk, Magda Franke, Bożena Werner","doi":"10.1111/jce.16635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low voltage bridge mapping (LVBM) is an approach to atrio-ventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation that has been postulated to facilitate the procedure. In our center, AVNRT ablations were performed with the traditional radio frequency current (RF) current approach using the CARTO mapping system. The use of LVBM in children has been well described with cryoablation but not with RF. LVBM was introduced in our center in April 2023 and is now routinely used for all AVNRT RF ablations. The aim of this study was to analyze how the introduction of the LVBM influenced the results of the pediatric AVNRT ablations using the RF current.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed all AVNRT ablations performed between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2024, and compared traditional and LVBM approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group (LVBM) consisted of 40 and the control group of 61 children. Both groups did not differ significantly regarding age, body weight, and sex distribution. In the LVBM group, the total time of RF applications was significantly shorter (median of 120 s vs 191 s) and the number of RF applications was smaller than in the control group (median of: 4.5 vs 8). Total procedural time did not differ significantly between the groups. The success rate at 3 months follow-up was higher in the LVBM (92% vs 85%) group but failed to differ statistically. No complications were reported in either of groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of the LVBM in RF AVNRT ablations in children allows for limiting the number and time of RF applications required, without prolonging the total procedure time. Our experience shows LVBM can also be effectively used in RF ablations of AVNRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low voltage bridge mapping (LVBM) is an approach to atrio-ventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation that has been postulated to facilitate the procedure. In our center, AVNRT ablations were performed with the traditional radio frequency current (RF) current approach using the CARTO mapping system. The use of LVBM in children has been well described with cryoablation but not with RF. LVBM was introduced in our center in April 2023 and is now routinely used for all AVNRT RF ablations. The aim of this study was to analyze how the introduction of the LVBM influenced the results of the pediatric AVNRT ablations using the RF current.

Methods: We analyzed all AVNRT ablations performed between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2024, and compared traditional and LVBM approaches.

Results: The study group (LVBM) consisted of 40 and the control group of 61 children. Both groups did not differ significantly regarding age, body weight, and sex distribution. In the LVBM group, the total time of RF applications was significantly shorter (median of 120 s vs 191 s) and the number of RF applications was smaller than in the control group (median of: 4.5 vs 8). Total procedural time did not differ significantly between the groups. The success rate at 3 months follow-up was higher in the LVBM (92% vs 85%) group but failed to differ statistically. No complications were reported in either of groups.

Conclusions: The introduction of the LVBM in RF AVNRT ablations in children allows for limiting the number and time of RF applications required, without prolonging the total procedure time. Our experience shows LVBM can also be effectively used in RF ablations of AVNRT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
期刊最新文献
Endo-Epicardial vs. Endocardial-Only Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: The EPIC-VT Trial Design. Concerns Regarding "Echocardiographic Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator". Distribution Variance of Focal Atrial Tachycardia Foci and Long-Term Outcomes After Ablation: Experience From Two Chinese Centers. Factors Affecting the Impact of LBBBP on Ventricular Electrical Activation. Introduction of the Low Voltage Bridge Mapping for the AVNRT RF Ablation in Children - Early Follow-Up Results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1