Prediction of prostate biopsy outcomes at different cut-offs of prostate-specific antigen using machine learning: a multicenter study.

Mostafa A Arafa, Karim H Farhat, Sherin F Aly, Farrukh K Khan, Alaa Mokhtar, Abdulaziz M Althunayan, Waleed Al-Taweel, Sultan S Al-Khateeb, Sami Azhari, Danny M Rabah
{"title":"Prediction of prostate biopsy outcomes at different cut-offs of prostate-specific antigen using machine learning: a multicenter study.","authors":"Mostafa A Arafa, Karim H Farhat, Sherin F Aly, Farrukh K Khan, Alaa Mokhtar, Abdulaziz M Althunayan, Waleed Al-Taweel, Sultan S Al-Khateeb, Sami Azhari, Danny M Rabah","doi":"10.1186/s43046-025-00265-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Machine learning (ML) is a significant area of artificial intelligence, which can improve the accuracy of predictive or diagnostic models for differentiating between prostate biopsy outcomes. This study aims to develop a novel decision-support ML model for classifying patients with biopsy-negative (cancer-free), clinically significant, and non-clinically significant prostate cancer across two prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cut-offs ≤ 10 ng/ml and > 10 ng/ml.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data for the current study were retrieved from the records of two main hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from July 2018 through July 2024. Six machine learning algorithms were employed, and the dataset was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 8:2. The following metrics were used as performance indicators across the six algorithms: Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and area under the curve. Recent data from the two hospitals was utilized for external validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The metrics for Random Forest, Extra Tree, and Decision Tree algorithms showed excellent capability in classifying the outcomes of prostate biopsy for the two PSA cut-offs. However, the metrics for the PSA cut-off > 10 ng/ml are higher than those for PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml. For the three-class classification, the accuracy and area under the curve for the cut-off > 10 ng/ml were 0.96 and 0.99, respectively. While for the cut-off ≤ 10 ng/ml they were 0.92 and 0.94 for Random Forest and 0.94 and 0.95 for the Extra Tree algorithm. The metrics of non-clinically significant and biopsy-negative cases outperformed those of clinically significant cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML models are proving to be effective tools in differentiating between prostate biopsy outcomes, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, and potentially transforming clinical practices in prostate cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":17301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute","volume":"37 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43046-025-00265-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Machine learning (ML) is a significant area of artificial intelligence, which can improve the accuracy of predictive or diagnostic models for differentiating between prostate biopsy outcomes. This study aims to develop a novel decision-support ML model for classifying patients with biopsy-negative (cancer-free), clinically significant, and non-clinically significant prostate cancer across two prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cut-offs ≤ 10 ng/ml and > 10 ng/ml.

Methods: The data for the current study were retrieved from the records of two main hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from July 2018 through July 2024. Six machine learning algorithms were employed, and the dataset was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 8:2. The following metrics were used as performance indicators across the six algorithms: Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and area under the curve. Recent data from the two hospitals was utilized for external validation.

Results: The metrics for Random Forest, Extra Tree, and Decision Tree algorithms showed excellent capability in classifying the outcomes of prostate biopsy for the two PSA cut-offs. However, the metrics for the PSA cut-off > 10 ng/ml are higher than those for PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml. For the three-class classification, the accuracy and area under the curve for the cut-off > 10 ng/ml were 0.96 and 0.99, respectively. While for the cut-off ≤ 10 ng/ml they were 0.92 and 0.94 for Random Forest and 0.94 and 0.95 for the Extra Tree algorithm. The metrics of non-clinically significant and biopsy-negative cases outperformed those of clinically significant cases.

Conclusion: ML models are proving to be effective tools in differentiating between prostate biopsy outcomes, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, and potentially transforming clinical practices in prostate cancer management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用机器学习预测前列腺特异性抗原不同截断点的前列腺活检结果:一项多中心研究。
背景:机器学习(ML)是人工智能的一个重要领域,它可以提高预测或诊断模型区分前列腺活检结果的准确性。本研究旨在开发一种新的决策支持ML模型,用于通过两个前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)临界值≤10 ng/ ML和bbb10 ng/ ML对活检阴性(无癌)、临床显著和非临床显著前列腺癌患者进行分类。方法:本研究的数据来自沙特阿拉伯利雅得两家主要医院2018年7月至2024年7月的记录。采用6种机器学习算法,将数据集按8:2的比例随机分为训练集和验证集。以下指标被用作六种算法的性能指标:准确性、精密度、召回率、f1分数和曲线下面积。利用这两家医院的最新数据进行外部验证。结果:随机森林、额外树和决策树算法的指标在两种PSA切断的前列腺活检结果分类方面表现出出色的能力。然而,PSA临界值为10 ng/ml的指标高于PSA≤10 ng/ml的指标。对于三级分类,截止浓度bbb10 ng/ml的准确度和曲线下面积分别为0.96和0.99。而对于截止值≤10 ng/ml, Random Forest算法的截止值分别为0.92和0.94,Extra Tree算法的截止值分别为0.94和0.95。无临床意义和活检阴性病例的指标优于临床意义病例的指标。结论:ML模型被证明是区分前列腺活检结果、提高诊断准确性的有效工具,并有可能改变前列腺癌治疗的临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, the Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute (JENCI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal that publishes on the latest innovations in oncology and thereby, providing academics and clinicians a leading research platform. JENCI welcomes submissions pertaining to all fields of basic, applied and clinical cancer research. Main topics of interest include: local and systemic anticancer therapy (with specific interest on applied cancer research from developing countries); experimental oncology; early cancer detection; randomized trials (including negatives ones); and key emerging fields of personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, and biotechnologies.
期刊最新文献
Oncological safety and short-term aesthetic outcome of extreme oncoplasty for breast cancer. Impact of bladder volume precision control on setup errors and dosimetry in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for cervical cancer. Serum biomarkers as personalised medicine for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches of hepatocellular carcinoma. Efficacy of scrambler therapy in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Experimental models of chemical carcinogenesis: bridging toxicology and preclinical pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1