Exploring the 'fit for work' principle: The association between occupational physical activity, cardio-respiratory fitness, and mortality - a meta-analysis of male worker data.
Margo Ketels, Bart Cillekens, Els Clays, Maaike A Huysmans, Dirk De Bacquer, Andreas Holtermann, Richard P Troiano, Paul Jarle Mork, Steinar Krokstad, Henry Völzke, Marcus Dörr, Martin Bahls, Till Ittermann, Johan Clausen, Magnus T Jensen, Jussi Kauhanen, Ari Voutilainen, Miriam Wanner, Matthias Bopp, Willem van Mechelen, Allard J van der Beek, Pieter Coenen
{"title":"Exploring the 'fit for work' principle: The association between occupational physical activity, cardio-respiratory fitness, and mortality - a meta-analysis of male worker data.","authors":"Margo Ketels, Bart Cillekens, Els Clays, Maaike A Huysmans, Dirk De Bacquer, Andreas Holtermann, Richard P Troiano, Paul Jarle Mork, Steinar Krokstad, Henry Völzke, Marcus Dörr, Martin Bahls, Till Ittermann, Johan Clausen, Magnus T Jensen, Jussi Kauhanen, Ari Voutilainen, Miriam Wanner, Matthias Bopp, Willem van Mechelen, Allard J van der Beek, Pieter Coenen","doi":"10.5271/sjweh.4218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This individual participant data meta-analysis investigates the association between occupational physical activity (OPA) and both cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality across different cardio-respiratory fitness (CRF) groups among male workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were pooled from five European cohort studies. OPA was categorized into three levels and CRF into low, moderate, and high tertiles. OPA was assessed using self-reports and CRF through objective measurements. Two-stage meta-analyses were conducted. First, we analyzed each cohort using Cox-regression models then we pooled results with random effects model to evaluate the associations between OPA and both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, stratified by CRF. Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking status, leisure-time physical activity, and educational level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9922 men (mean age 46.8, standard deviation 6.7, years), 55.7% died during an average 25.6-year follow-up, of which 29.3% died from cardiovascular causes. Individuals with low CRF and high levels of OPA showed increased risks of cardiovascular [hazard ratio (HR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.55] and all-cause mortality (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40) compared to those with low CRF and low levels of OPA. High CRF mitigated cardiovascular mortality risk (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.48) but not all-cause mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.98-1.83) for those with high OPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings for cardiovascular mortality suggest that high CRF levels may protect workers with physically demanding jobs from adverse cardiovascular outcomes, supporting the 'fit for work' principle. However, this protective effect was not observed for all-cause mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":21528,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4218","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This individual participant data meta-analysis investigates the association between occupational physical activity (OPA) and both cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality across different cardio-respiratory fitness (CRF) groups among male workers.
Methods: Data were pooled from five European cohort studies. OPA was categorized into three levels and CRF into low, moderate, and high tertiles. OPA was assessed using self-reports and CRF through objective measurements. Two-stage meta-analyses were conducted. First, we analyzed each cohort using Cox-regression models then we pooled results with random effects model to evaluate the associations between OPA and both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, stratified by CRF. Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking status, leisure-time physical activity, and educational level.
Results: Among 9922 men (mean age 46.8, standard deviation 6.7, years), 55.7% died during an average 25.6-year follow-up, of which 29.3% died from cardiovascular causes. Individuals with low CRF and high levels of OPA showed increased risks of cardiovascular [hazard ratio (HR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.55] and all-cause mortality (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40) compared to those with low CRF and low levels of OPA. High CRF mitigated cardiovascular mortality risk (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.48) but not all-cause mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.98-1.83) for those with high OPA.
Conclusions: Our findings for cardiovascular mortality suggest that high CRF levels may protect workers with physically demanding jobs from adverse cardiovascular outcomes, supporting the 'fit for work' principle. However, this protective effect was not observed for all-cause mortality.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal is to promote research in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety and to increase knowledge through the publication of original research articles, systematic reviews, and other information of high interest. Areas of interest include occupational and environmental epidemiology, occupational and environmental medicine, psychosocial factors at work, physical work load, physical activity work-related mental and musculoskeletal problems, aging, work ability and return to work, working hours and health, occupational hygiene and toxicology, work safety and injury epidemiology as well as occupational health services. In addition to observational studies, quasi-experimental and intervention studies are welcome as well as methodological papers, occupational cohort profiles, and studies associated with economic evaluation. The Journal also publishes short communications, case reports, commentaries, discussion papers, clinical questions, consensus reports, meeting reports, other reports, book reviews, news, and announcements (jobs, courses, events etc).