{"title":"Microneedle for Botulinum Toxin: A Randomized, Case-control, Single-blind Study to Assess Clinical Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction.","authors":"Alberto Diaspro, Silvia Silenzi","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral canthal lines can be effectively treated with injections of botulinum toxin, whereas the aesthetic effects can vary due to factors such as injection depth, which is essential for achieving predictable clinical outcomes. Microneedles (MNs) have proven effective in intradermal skin rejuvenation procedures. However, a comparison of their performance with traditional needles is still lacking in the scientific literature to reliably evaluate their efficacy.This study is therefore aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction of botulinum toxin A injected intradermally using a standard needle versus an MN device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty recruited participants received a single injection of 10 Speywood Units (US, 0.05 mL) for each of the six standard points (total dose: 60 US) at T0 using both the control needle and the MN, randomly assigned.Follow-up visits were scheduled at 30 (T1) and 90 (T2) days, along with patients and blind observer evaluation of the clinical improvement of periocular wrinkles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measurement of wrinkle depth showed that MN injection had similar efficacy to a normal needle, whereas blind evaluation indicated better results for the MN. Patient subjective assessments of procedure pain/discomfort and likelihood of repeating the procedure also favored the MN.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study suggests that the MN device holds promise for optimizing the clinical results of botulinum toxin injections by controlling injection depth and enhancing patient acceptance and injection experience compared to standard needle injection. The absence of adverse events further supports the efficacy of MN for intradermal botulinum toxin use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 3","pages":"e6610"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11913416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Lateral canthal lines can be effectively treated with injections of botulinum toxin, whereas the aesthetic effects can vary due to factors such as injection depth, which is essential for achieving predictable clinical outcomes. Microneedles (MNs) have proven effective in intradermal skin rejuvenation procedures. However, a comparison of their performance with traditional needles is still lacking in the scientific literature to reliably evaluate their efficacy.This study is therefore aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction of botulinum toxin A injected intradermally using a standard needle versus an MN device.
Methods: Twenty recruited participants received a single injection of 10 Speywood Units (US, 0.05 mL) for each of the six standard points (total dose: 60 US) at T0 using both the control needle and the MN, randomly assigned.Follow-up visits were scheduled at 30 (T1) and 90 (T2) days, along with patients and blind observer evaluation of the clinical improvement of periocular wrinkles.
Results: The measurement of wrinkle depth showed that MN injection had similar efficacy to a normal needle, whereas blind evaluation indicated better results for the MN. Patient subjective assessments of procedure pain/discomfort and likelihood of repeating the procedure also favored the MN.
Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that the MN device holds promise for optimizing the clinical results of botulinum toxin injections by controlling injection depth and enhancing patient acceptance and injection experience compared to standard needle injection. The absence of adverse events further supports the efficacy of MN for intradermal botulinum toxin use.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.