Healthcare professionals' perceptions of electronic medical record privacy and its impact on work quality in Riyadh hospitals.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Saudi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.15537/smj.2025.46.3.20240928
Alaa A Qashqari, Dunya S Almutairi, Soukaina A Ennaceur, Nesren S Farhah, Mohammed A Almohaithef
{"title":"Healthcare professionals' perceptions of electronic medical record privacy and its impact on work quality in Riyadh hospitals.","authors":"Alaa A Qashqari, Dunya S Almutairi, Soukaina A Ennaceur, Nesren S Farhah, Mohammed A Almohaithef","doi":"10.15537/smj.2025.46.3.20240928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate healthcare professionals' perceptions of electronic medical records (EMRs) privacy and its impact on work quality in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 381 healthcare professionals were surveyed using a self-administered online questionnaire, which collected data on their familiarity with EMRs, perceptions of data protection, and experiences with privacy breaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed that 79.3% of the respondents were familiar with EMRs. However, only 69.6% expressed confidence in safeguarding patient data from unauthorized access. Alarmingly, 25.5% admitted to accessing colleagues' EMRs without permission, raising significant privacy concerns. Despite the presence of organizational privacy policies, 24.6% of the respondents were unaware or unsure of these policies. The study also highlighted the impact of privacy issues on healthcare staff, with 63.5% expressing concerns regarding the effects of EMR privacy on confidentiality and 39.4% reporting increased stress levels. Statistical analyses revealed significant associations between privacy concerns and stress (<i>p</i>=0.010) but no associations with avoiding medical care or behavior changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the urgent need for healthcare institutions to address privacy-related issues in EMRs and enhance data security measures and staff training to safeguard patient confidentiality and improve overall work quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":21453,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Medical Journal","volume":"46 3","pages":"299-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2025.46.3.20240928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate healthcare professionals' perceptions of electronic medical records (EMRs) privacy and its impact on work quality in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, hospitals.

Methods: A total of 381 healthcare professionals were surveyed using a self-administered online questionnaire, which collected data on their familiarity with EMRs, perceptions of data protection, and experiences with privacy breaches.

Results: The findings revealed that 79.3% of the respondents were familiar with EMRs. However, only 69.6% expressed confidence in safeguarding patient data from unauthorized access. Alarmingly, 25.5% admitted to accessing colleagues' EMRs without permission, raising significant privacy concerns. Despite the presence of organizational privacy policies, 24.6% of the respondents were unaware or unsure of these policies. The study also highlighted the impact of privacy issues on healthcare staff, with 63.5% expressing concerns regarding the effects of EMR privacy on confidentiality and 39.4% reporting increased stress levels. Statistical analyses revealed significant associations between privacy concerns and stress (p=0.010) but no associations with avoiding medical care or behavior changes.

Conclusion: This study underscores the urgent need for healthcare institutions to address privacy-related issues in EMRs and enhance data security measures and staff training to safeguard patient confidentiality and improve overall work quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健专业人员对电子病历隐私的看法及其对利雅得医院工作质量的影响。
目的:调查沙特阿拉伯利雅得医院医疗保健专业人员对电子病历(EMRs)隐私的看法及其对工作质量的影响。方法:使用一份自我管理的在线问卷调查了381名医疗保健专业人员,收集了他们对电子病历的熟悉程度、对数据保护的看法以及隐私泄露的经历。结果:79.3%的被调查者熟悉电子病历。然而,只有69.6%的受访者表示有信心保护患者数据免受未经授权的访问。令人担忧的是,25.5%的人承认在未经允许的情况下访问了同事的电子病历,这引发了严重的隐私问题。尽管存在组织隐私政策,24.6%的受访者不知道或不确定这些政策。该研究还强调了隐私问题对医护人员的影响,63.5%的人表示担心电子病历隐私对保密性的影响,39.4%的人表示压力水平增加。统计分析显示,隐私问题与压力之间存在显著关联(p=0.010),但与避免就医或行为改变之间没有关联。结论:本研究强调医疗机构迫切需要解决电子病历中与隐私相关的问题,加强数据安全措施和员工培训,以保障患者的隐私,提高整体工作质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Medical Journal
Saudi Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
203
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Saudi Medical Journal is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal. It is an open access journal, with content released under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommercial license. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, Systematic Reviews, Case Reports, Brief Communication, Brief Report, Clinical Note, Clinical Image, Editorials, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Student Corner.
期刊最新文献
Interventional study of the iSelfie heart health tool for assessment of vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, and Oxygen Saturation) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Genodermatosis among the southwestern Saudi population: The pattern and the need for a premarital genetic screening protocol. Examining public satisfaction with the Saudi health system: Findings from the 2019 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia World Health survey. Launch of online learning course on using the IARC Atlas of Breast Cancer Early Detection. Navigating challenges in management of difficult-to-treat chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the greater Gulf.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1