Comparative evaluation on the masking ability of different tooth colored restoration over blackish discoloration caused by 38% silver diamine fluoride: an in -vitro study.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BDJ Open Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1038/s41405-025-00318-8
Prajval Mahajan, Anupama Nayak P, Srikant Natarajan, Karuna Yarmunje Mahabala, Kiran N Baliga, Ashwin Rao, Charisma Thimmaiah
{"title":"Comparative evaluation on the masking ability of different tooth colored restoration over blackish discoloration caused by 38% silver diamine fluoride: an in -vitro study.","authors":"Prajval Mahajan, Anupama Nayak P, Srikant Natarajan, Karuna Yarmunje Mahabala, Kiran N Baliga, Ashwin Rao, Charisma Thimmaiah","doi":"10.1038/s41405-025-00318-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The application of Silver diamine fluoride is an effective approach in controlling dental caries. But the black discoloration caused by its application is unaesthetic and is of greater concern to the parents.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the potential color masking ability of tooth colored restorative material over discoloration caused by 38% SDF using a UV‒VIS-NIR spectrophotometer.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>20 extracted teeth were taken and randomly divided into 4 groups: Group A: 38% SDF + GIC; Group B: 38% SDF + RMGIC; Group C: 38% SDF+ Composite; Group D: 38% SDF+ Cention N. Two readings were recorded, one on application of 38% SDF and second after application of test materials using a UV‒VIS-NIR spectrophotometer.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The intragroup comparison for color masking ability (ΔE) for all four restorative materials revealed no statistically significant differences, with a test value of 1.168 and a p value of 0.353, and the highest mean was observed in Group A, i.e., 38% SDF + GIC (9.171966) Significant differences in color were observed, with more shifts toward yellow in group A (2.488 ± 2.957) and group D (1.686 ± 0.559) and more shifts toward green in groups B (-0.088 ± 0.34) and C (-0.062 ± 0.5). The mean lightness was greatest for Group C, i.e., the composite group (86.396 ± 3.741), and least for Group A, i.e., the GIC group (76.664 ± 8.213).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All 4 restorative materials were equally effective in terms of color masking over 38% SDF discoloration.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-025-00318-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The application of Silver diamine fluoride is an effective approach in controlling dental caries. But the black discoloration caused by its application is unaesthetic and is of greater concern to the parents.

Aim: To assess the potential color masking ability of tooth colored restorative material over discoloration caused by 38% SDF using a UV‒VIS-NIR spectrophotometer.

Material and methods: 20 extracted teeth were taken and randomly divided into 4 groups: Group A: 38% SDF + GIC; Group B: 38% SDF + RMGIC; Group C: 38% SDF+ Composite; Group D: 38% SDF+ Cention N. Two readings were recorded, one on application of 38% SDF and second after application of test materials using a UV‒VIS-NIR spectrophotometer.

Result: The intragroup comparison for color masking ability (ΔE) for all four restorative materials revealed no statistically significant differences, with a test value of 1.168 and a p value of 0.353, and the highest mean was observed in Group A, i.e., 38% SDF + GIC (9.171966) Significant differences in color were observed, with more shifts toward yellow in group A (2.488 ± 2.957) and group D (1.686 ± 0.559) and more shifts toward green in groups B (-0.088 ± 0.34) and C (-0.062 ± 0.5). The mean lightness was greatest for Group C, i.e., the composite group (86.396 ± 3.741), and least for Group A, i.e., the GIC group (76.664 ± 8.213).

Conclusion: All 4 restorative materials were equally effective in terms of color masking over 38% SDF discoloration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Prenatal diagnosis of bilateral persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous: A case report
IF 1.2 4区 医学Journal Francais D OphtalmologiePub Date : 2018-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.08.018
M. Luisin , S. Azdad , P. Naepels , C. Gondry-Jouet , V. Promelle , C. Muszynski , J. Gondry , J. Chevreau
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation on the masking ability of different tooth colored restoration over blackish discoloration caused by 38% silver diamine fluoride: an in -vitro study. Do CAD-CAM fibre posts exhibit higher bond strength and fracture resistance than other types of posts? systematic review with network meta-analysis of in-vitro studies. Drug-associated gingival disorders: a retrospective pharmacovigilance assessment using disproportionality analysis. In vitro evaluation of human enamel remineralization after treatment with Ginger, Ashwaganda and Maca herbal dentifrices versus commercially available fluoride containing dentifrice. Predictive factors for insertion torque values in transalveolar sinus lift procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1