Patient-healthcare Professional Dialog from the Patient's Perspective: Concept Analysis Based on Literature Review.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-03-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735251324395
Akiko Yamada
{"title":"Patient-healthcare Professional Dialog from the Patient's Perspective: Concept Analysis Based on Literature Review.","authors":"Akiko Yamada","doi":"10.1177/23743735251324395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient communication with healthcare professionals regarding their health is essential for patient engagement in healthcare; however, some medical professionals do not facilitate this process. This study aimed to analyze the concept of <i>patient-healthcare professional dialog</i> from the patient perspective, using Walker and Avant's eight stage methodology. The findings show that patient-healthcare professional dialog can be defined as the process in which patients exchange and share opinions with healthcare professionals who stay close to them, fostering a trusting partnership, while participating in the decision-making process regarding their medical care. The identified antecedents for dialog were the need for communication, time and space for dialog, and being acquainted with each other. Dialog determined the emergence of a desire for recovery and feelings of reassurance. This concept analysis has proven useful to understand patients in their entirety as individuals. It introduces a new framework for communication training programs, promoting patients' active involvement in their healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735251324395"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735251324395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient communication with healthcare professionals regarding their health is essential for patient engagement in healthcare; however, some medical professionals do not facilitate this process. This study aimed to analyze the concept of patient-healthcare professional dialog from the patient perspective, using Walker and Avant's eight stage methodology. The findings show that patient-healthcare professional dialog can be defined as the process in which patients exchange and share opinions with healthcare professionals who stay close to them, fostering a trusting partnership, while participating in the decision-making process regarding their medical care. The identified antecedents for dialog were the need for communication, time and space for dialog, and being acquainted with each other. Dialog determined the emergence of a desire for recovery and feelings of reassurance. This concept analysis has proven useful to understand patients in their entirety as individuals. It introduces a new framework for communication training programs, promoting patients' active involvement in their healthcare.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者视角下的医患对话:基于文献回顾的概念分析。
患者与医疗保健专业人员就其健康进行沟通对于患者参与医疗保健至关重要;然而,一些医疗专业人员并不支持这一过程。本研究旨在利用Walker和Avant的八阶段方法,从患者的角度分析患者-医疗保健专业对话的概念。研究结果显示,患者-医疗保健专业人员对话可以定义为患者与亲近的医疗保健专业人员交流和分享意见的过程,培养信任的伙伴关系,同时参与有关其医疗保健的决策过程。对话的前因是沟通的需要,对话的时间和空间,以及彼此熟悉。对话决定了恢复的愿望和安心的感觉的出现。事实证明,这种概念分析有助于全面了解个体患者。它引入了一个新的沟通培训计划框架,促进患者积极参与他们的医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Visual Hallucinations and Illusions as Missed Diagnostic Clues in Autoimmune Disease: A Patient Perspective. Designing Nutrition Studies for Long COVID and Related Infection-Associated Chronic Illness: Qualitative Insights From a Patient-Reported Evaluation of Ketogenic Metabolic Therapy. Exploring Patient Heterogeneity in Service Quality Gaps and Satisfaction: Insights from Outpatient Care. Using a Quality Improvement Priority Metric to Promote Uniformly High-Quality Care: An Illustrative Example Using Child HCAHPS Survey Data. Lived Experiences of Patients With Sickle Cell Disease and Kidney Failure: Insights From a Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1