Follow the metrics? How does social media affect the journalistic practices of digital science communication start-ups?

IF 3.3 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Public Understanding of Science Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1177/09636625251325658
Jing Yang, Xizhu Xiao, Jianbin Jin
{"title":"Follow the metrics? How does social media affect the journalistic practices of digital science communication start-ups?","authors":"Jing Yang, Xizhu Xiao, Jianbin Jin","doi":"10.1177/09636625251325658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The influence of social media platforms on content production has been widely discussed in journalism studies, yet there remains limited research on its specific impact on science communication. This Chinese case study explores how social media logic affects the practices of digital science communication within a leading start-up in the field. Using in-depth interviews and participant observation, the study examines how key components of social media logic-such as engagement metrics and the drive to avoid invisibility-shape content production. The findings reveal that these influences intertwine with other factors, including platform regulations, creating a complex environment for content creation. This research offers insights into the broader implications for science communication and highlights potential avenues for future inquiry.</p>","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":" ","pages":"884-900"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Understanding of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625251325658","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The influence of social media platforms on content production has been widely discussed in journalism studies, yet there remains limited research on its specific impact on science communication. This Chinese case study explores how social media logic affects the practices of digital science communication within a leading start-up in the field. Using in-depth interviews and participant observation, the study examines how key components of social media logic-such as engagement metrics and the drive to avoid invisibility-shape content production. The findings reveal that these influences intertwine with other factors, including platform regulations, creating a complex environment for content creation. This research offers insights into the broader implications for science communication and highlights potential avenues for future inquiry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遵循指标?社交媒体如何影响数字科学传播初创企业的新闻实践?
社交媒体平台对内容生产的影响在新闻学研究中被广泛讨论,但对其对科学传播的具体影响的研究仍然有限。这个中国案例研究探讨了社交媒体逻辑如何影响该领域领先的初创企业的数字科学传播实践。通过深度访谈和参与者观察,该研究考察了社交媒体逻辑的关键组成部分——如参与指标和避免不可见性的驱动力——如何塑造内容生产。研究结果显示,这些影响与其他因素交织在一起,包括平台规则,为内容创作创造了一个复杂的环境。这项研究为科学传播提供了更广泛的见解,并强调了未来研究的潜在途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Public Understanding of Science is a fully peer reviewed international journal covering all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Public Understanding of Science is the only journal to cover all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Topics Covered Include... ·surveys of public understanding and attitudes towards science and technology ·perceptions of science ·popular representations of science ·scientific and para-scientific belief systems ·science in schools
期刊最新文献
Experts' boundary work on social media: Doctors on Instagram. Public backlash against science communicators: Conceptualization and qualitative analysis of perceptions, effects, responses, and contextual factors. Too sure or not sure enough? Trust may hinge on scientists' uncertainty matching knowledgeable audiences' tolerance for it. Threatened by science: Can affirmations alleviate motivated science rejection? Public engagement professionals: Exploring ethical tensions in communication, engagement and co-creation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1