Predictors of willingness to patronize traditional bone setters: a cross-sectional study among heads of households in Abakaliki Metropolis, Southeast Nigeria.

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pan African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.11604/pamj.2024.49.106.36444
Edmund Ndudi Ossai, Ifeyinwa Lilian Ezenwosu, Kelechukwu Anthony Okoro, Irene Ifeyinwa Eze, Chibuike Agu
{"title":"Predictors of willingness to patronize traditional bone setters: a cross-sectional study among heads of households in Abakaliki Metropolis, Southeast Nigeria.","authors":"Edmund Ndudi Ossai, Ifeyinwa Lilian Ezenwosu, Kelechukwu Anthony Okoro, Irene Ifeyinwa Eze, Chibuike Agu","doi":"10.11604/pamj.2024.49.106.36444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>the traditional bone setters provide services that are commonly associated with complications that could be life-threatening. Nevertheless, these do not affect the proportion of people who patronize traditional bonesetters. This study aimed to determine the predictors of willingness to patronize traditional bone setters among heads of households in Abakaliki Metropolis, Southeast Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>this was a community-based cross-sectional study. A four-stage sampling design was used to select 420 heads of households from Abakaliki Metropolis, Nigeria. Information was obtained using a pre-tested, interviewer-administered questionnaire which was developed by the researchers. The study employed Chi-square test and multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>less than a third of the respondents, 32.4% were willing to patronize traditional bone setters in the future and the major reasons included reduced treatment cost, 45.6% and good treatment services, 29.4%. Predictors of the willingness of heads of household to patronize traditional bone setters in the future included being aged 30-39 years, (AOR=0.5, 95%CI: 0.2-0.9), being in low socio-economic class, (AOR=2.0, 95%CI: 1.2-3.3), having patronized traditional bone setters before, (AOR=12.5, 95%CI: 7.5-20.8) and being in support of surgeons and bone setters working together, (AOR=2.7, 95%CI: 1.6-4.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>cost and good treatment services play roles in the patronage of bone setters. An appreciable number of respondents are willing to patronize them in the future. There is the need for bone setters to concentrate on areas of competence bearing in mind that there are measures of good in their services. They should be trained on good referral practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48190,"journal":{"name":"Pan African Medical Journal","volume":"49 ","pages":"106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2024.49.106.36444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: the traditional bone setters provide services that are commonly associated with complications that could be life-threatening. Nevertheless, these do not affect the proportion of people who patronize traditional bonesetters. This study aimed to determine the predictors of willingness to patronize traditional bone setters among heads of households in Abakaliki Metropolis, Southeast Nigeria.

Methods: this was a community-based cross-sectional study. A four-stage sampling design was used to select 420 heads of households from Abakaliki Metropolis, Nigeria. Information was obtained using a pre-tested, interviewer-administered questionnaire which was developed by the researchers. The study employed Chi-square test and multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression.

Results: less than a third of the respondents, 32.4% were willing to patronize traditional bone setters in the future and the major reasons included reduced treatment cost, 45.6% and good treatment services, 29.4%. Predictors of the willingness of heads of household to patronize traditional bone setters in the future included being aged 30-39 years, (AOR=0.5, 95%CI: 0.2-0.9), being in low socio-economic class, (AOR=2.0, 95%CI: 1.2-3.3), having patronized traditional bone setters before, (AOR=12.5, 95%CI: 7.5-20.8) and being in support of surgeons and bone setters working together, (AOR=2.7, 95%CI: 1.6-4.4).

Conclusion: cost and good treatment services play roles in the patronage of bone setters. An appreciable number of respondents are willing to patronize them in the future. There is the need for bone setters to concentrate on areas of competence bearing in mind that there are measures of good in their services. They should be trained on good referral practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pan African Medical Journal
Pan African Medical Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
691
期刊最新文献
Detection of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene methylation status in IDH-wild type glioblastomas using methylation-specific qPCR: a first report from Morocco. A rare case of simultaneous spontaneous coronary artery dissections in the circumflex and the right coronary arteries presenting as acute myocardial infarction: a case report. Managing gender-based violence patients: implications for the practices and attitudes of emergency medical care providers. Exostosis or osteochondroma. Predictors of willingness to patronize traditional bone setters: a cross-sectional study among heads of households in Abakaliki Metropolis, Southeast Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1