Total knee arthroplasty after prior high tibial osteotomy results in comparable survival and clinical outcomes but significantly higher complication rates compared to primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 550,000 patients.

Ryan Wai Keong Loke, Barry Wei Loong Tan, Erel Yun En Kane Tan, James H P Hui
{"title":"Total knee arthroplasty after prior high tibial osteotomy results in comparable survival and clinical outcomes but significantly higher complication rates compared to primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 550,000 patients.","authors":"Ryan Wai Keong Loke, Barry Wei Loong Tan, Erel Yun En Kane Tan, James H P Hui","doi":"10.1007/s00590-025-04237-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) is an effective surgical option in managing medial compartment knee osteoarthritis in the relatively younger population group but most will eventually require conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). TKA post-HTO is considered more complex than a primary TKA, given the numerous factors that increase the difficulty of the surgery-skin and soft tissue scarring, patella baja, limited knee motion, anatomical deformity or bony distortion of the proximal tibial metaphysis after HTO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A random-effects meta-analysis of comparative studies between TKA post-HTO and primary TKA was performed. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and SCOPUS from inception to August 1, 2024. Survivorship outcomes in terms of revision rates were analyzed. Where possible, further subgrouping to assess the impact of different techniques was performed. Secondarily, associated complications, surgical duration and clinical outcomes (Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Scores and Knee Society Scores (KSS) (Knee & Function)) were pooled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At short-term follow-up, pooled revision rate for TKA post-HTO was 2.9% (95%CI 1.7-5.1) while that for primary TKA was 1.9% (95%CI 1.2-2.9). At mid-term follow-up, the pooled revision rate was 4.8% (95%CI 2.8-8.2) compared to 3.0% (95%CI 1.9-4.8) in primary TKA. At long-term follow-up, the pooled revision rate for TKA post-HTO was 7.2% (95%CI 1.3-30.9), while that of primary TKA was 4.1% (95%CI 1.6-10.2). No significant differences were noted between both groups at each follow-up. Pooled complication rate for TKA post-HTO was 15.8% (95%CI 12.3-20.0%), while that for primary TKA group was 6.1% (95%CI3.5-10.4). TKA post-HTO had significantly greater complication rates than in primary TKA (WMD: 2.6, 95%CI 2.2-3.1, p < 0.01). Pooled mean postoperative HSS scores were 83.5 (95% CI 80.1-86.8) in the TKA post-HTO group, compared to 86.1 (95% CI 82.3-90.0) in the primary TKA group. Pooled mean postoperative KSS (Knee) scores were 85.9 (95% CI 83.6-88.2) in the TKA post-HTO group, and 88.1 (95% CI 84.4-91.7) in the primary TKA group. Pooled mean postoperative KSS (Function) scores were 77.1 (95% CI 72.1-82.1) in the TKA post-HTO group and 78.4 (95% CI 74.5-82.5) in the primary TKA group. No significant differences were noted between both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TKA post-HTO has comparable survival but significantly higher complication rates than primary TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":"119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-025-04237-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) is an effective surgical option in managing medial compartment knee osteoarthritis in the relatively younger population group but most will eventually require conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). TKA post-HTO is considered more complex than a primary TKA, given the numerous factors that increase the difficulty of the surgery-skin and soft tissue scarring, patella baja, limited knee motion, anatomical deformity or bony distortion of the proximal tibial metaphysis after HTO.

Methods: A random-effects meta-analysis of comparative studies between TKA post-HTO and primary TKA was performed. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and SCOPUS from inception to August 1, 2024. Survivorship outcomes in terms of revision rates were analyzed. Where possible, further subgrouping to assess the impact of different techniques was performed. Secondarily, associated complications, surgical duration and clinical outcomes (Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Scores and Knee Society Scores (KSS) (Knee & Function)) were pooled.

Results: At short-term follow-up, pooled revision rate for TKA post-HTO was 2.9% (95%CI 1.7-5.1) while that for primary TKA was 1.9% (95%CI 1.2-2.9). At mid-term follow-up, the pooled revision rate was 4.8% (95%CI 2.8-8.2) compared to 3.0% (95%CI 1.9-4.8) in primary TKA. At long-term follow-up, the pooled revision rate for TKA post-HTO was 7.2% (95%CI 1.3-30.9), while that of primary TKA was 4.1% (95%CI 1.6-10.2). No significant differences were noted between both groups at each follow-up. Pooled complication rate for TKA post-HTO was 15.8% (95%CI 12.3-20.0%), while that for primary TKA group was 6.1% (95%CI3.5-10.4). TKA post-HTO had significantly greater complication rates than in primary TKA (WMD: 2.6, 95%CI 2.2-3.1, p < 0.01). Pooled mean postoperative HSS scores were 83.5 (95% CI 80.1-86.8) in the TKA post-HTO group, compared to 86.1 (95% CI 82.3-90.0) in the primary TKA group. Pooled mean postoperative KSS (Knee) scores were 85.9 (95% CI 83.6-88.2) in the TKA post-HTO group, and 88.1 (95% CI 84.4-91.7) in the primary TKA group. Pooled mean postoperative KSS (Function) scores were 77.1 (95% CI 72.1-82.1) in the TKA post-HTO group and 78.4 (95% CI 74.5-82.5) in the primary TKA group. No significant differences were noted between both groups.

Conclusion: TKA post-HTO has comparable survival but significantly higher complication rates than primary TKA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Flap coverage within 8 days does not increase fracture-related infection risk: results of a protocol implementation in a developing country. Surgical treatment of acetabular fractures: a comparative cohort study comparing orthogonal double plating to suprapectineal quadrilateral surface (QLS) plate osteosynthesis. Total knee arthroplasty after prior high tibial osteotomy results in comparable survival and clinical outcomes but significantly higher complication rates compared to primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 550,000 patients. Variables associated with loss of reduction after plate fixation of pubic symphysis injuries. Functional outcomes of patients presenting with traumatic hip dislocations at a tertiary care center: a descriptive observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1