Unlocking the full potential of high-density surface EMG: novel non-invasive high-yield motor unit decomposition

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Physiology-London Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1113/JP287913
Agnese Grison, Irene Mendez Guerra, Alexander Kenneth Clarke, Silvia Muceli, Jaime Ibáñez, Dario Farina
{"title":"Unlocking the full potential of high-density surface EMG: novel non-invasive high-yield motor unit decomposition","authors":"Agnese Grison,&nbsp;Irene Mendez Guerra,&nbsp;Alexander Kenneth Clarke,&nbsp;Silvia Muceli,&nbsp;Jaime Ibáñez,&nbsp;Dario Farina","doi":"10.1113/JP287913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <div>The decomposition of high-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) signals into motor unit discharge patterns has become a powerful tool for investigating the neural control of movement, providing insights into motor neuron recruitment and discharge behaviour. However, current algorithms, while effective under certain conditions, face significant challenges in complex scenarios, as their accuracy and motor unit yield are highly dependent on anatomical differences among individuals. To address this issue, we recently introduced Swarm-Contrastive Decomposition (SCD), which dynamically adjusts the contrast function based on the distribution of the data. Here, we demonstrate the ability of SCD in identifying low-amplitude motor unit action potentials and effectively handling complex decomposition scenarios. We validated SCD using simulated and experimental HD-sEMG recordings and compared it with current state-of-the-art decomposition methods under varying conditions, including different excitation levels, noise intensities, force profiles, sexes and muscle groups. The proposed method consistently outperformed existing techniques in both the quantity of decoded motor units and the precision of their firing time identification. Across different simulated excitation levels, SCD detected, on average, 25.9 ±5.8 motor units <i>vs</i>. 13.9 ± 2.7 found by a state-of-the-art baseline approach. Across noise levels, SCD detected 19.8 ± 13.5 motor units, compared to 11.9 ± 6.9 by the baseline method. In simulated conditions of high synchronisation levels, SCD detected approximately three times as many motor units compared to previous methods (31.2 ± 4.3 for SCD, 10.5 ± 1.7 for baseline), while also significantly improving accuracy. These advancements represent a step forward in non-invasive EMG technology for studying motor unit activity in complex scenarios.\n\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>High-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) decomposition provides information on how the nervous system controls muscles, but current methods struggle in complex conditions.</li>\n \n <li>Swarm-Contrastive Decomposition (SCD) is a new approach that dynamically adjusts how signals are separated, improving accuracy and increasing the sample of detected motor units.</li>\n \n <li>SCD successfully identifies more motor units, including those with low-amplitude signals, and performs well even in challenging conditions such as high-interference signals.</li>\n \n <li>In simulated ballistic contractions, SCD detected three times more motor units than previous methods while improving accuracy.</li>\n \n <li>These advancements could improve non-invasive studies of muscle function in movement, fatigue and neurological disorders.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":"603 8","pages":"2281-2300"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/JP287913","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP287913","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decomposition of high-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) signals into motor unit discharge patterns has become a powerful tool for investigating the neural control of movement, providing insights into motor neuron recruitment and discharge behaviour. However, current algorithms, while effective under certain conditions, face significant challenges in complex scenarios, as their accuracy and motor unit yield are highly dependent on anatomical differences among individuals. To address this issue, we recently introduced Swarm-Contrastive Decomposition (SCD), which dynamically adjusts the contrast function based on the distribution of the data. Here, we demonstrate the ability of SCD in identifying low-amplitude motor unit action potentials and effectively handling complex decomposition scenarios. We validated SCD using simulated and experimental HD-sEMG recordings and compared it with current state-of-the-art decomposition methods under varying conditions, including different excitation levels, noise intensities, force profiles, sexes and muscle groups. The proposed method consistently outperformed existing techniques in both the quantity of decoded motor units and the precision of their firing time identification. Across different simulated excitation levels, SCD detected, on average, 25.9 ±5.8 motor units vs. 13.9 ± 2.7 found by a state-of-the-art baseline approach. Across noise levels, SCD detected 19.8 ± 13.5 motor units, compared to 11.9 ± 6.9 by the baseline method. In simulated conditions of high synchronisation levels, SCD detected approximately three times as many motor units compared to previous methods (31.2 ± 4.3 for SCD, 10.5 ± 1.7 for baseline), while also significantly improving accuracy. These advancements represent a step forward in non-invasive EMG technology for studying motor unit activity in complex scenarios.

Key points

  • High-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) decomposition provides information on how the nervous system controls muscles, but current methods struggle in complex conditions.
  • Swarm-Contrastive Decomposition (SCD) is a new approach that dynamically adjusts how signals are separated, improving accuracy and increasing the sample of detected motor units.
  • SCD successfully identifies more motor units, including those with low-amplitude signals, and performs well even in challenging conditions such as high-interference signals.
  • In simulated ballistic contractions, SCD detected three times more motor units than previous methods while improving accuracy.
  • These advancements could improve non-invasive studies of muscle function in movement, fatigue and neurological disorders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
释放高密度表面肌电图的全部潜力:新型无创高产运动单元分解。
高密度表面肌电图(HD-sEMG)信号分解成运动单元放电模式已经成为研究运动神经控制的有力工具,为运动神经元的募集和放电行为提供了见解。然而,目前的算法虽然在某些条件下有效,但在复杂情况下面临重大挑战,因为它们的准确性和运动单位产量高度依赖于个体之间的解剖差异。为了解决这个问题,我们最近引入了基于数据分布动态调整对比度函数的群体对比分解(swarm - contrast Decomposition, SCD)。在这里,我们展示了SCD识别低振幅运动单元动作电位和有效处理复杂分解场景的能力。我们使用模拟和实验的HD-sEMG记录验证了SCD,并将其与当前最先进的分解方法在不同条件下进行了比较,包括不同的激励水平、噪音强度、力分布、性别和肌肉群。所提出的方法在解码运动单元的数量和其发射时间识别的精度方面始终优于现有技术。在不同的模拟激励水平下,SCD平均检测到25.9±5.8个运动单元,而最先进的基线方法检测到13.9±2.7个运动单元。在噪声水平上,SCD检测到19.8±13.5个运动单元,而基线方法检测到11.9±6.9个运动单元。在高同步水平的模拟条件下,与之前的方法相比,SCD检测到的运动单元数量约为三倍(SCD为31.2±4.3,基线为10.5±1.7),同时也显著提高了准确性。这些进步代表了研究复杂情况下运动单元活动的非侵入性肌电图技术向前迈进了一步。重点:高密度表面肌电图(HD-sEMG)分解提供了神经系统如何控制肌肉的信息,但目前的方法在复杂的条件下挣扎。群体对比分解(SCD)是一种动态调整信号分离方式的新方法,可以提高精度并增加被检测运动单元的样本。SCD成功地识别了更多的运动单元,包括那些具有低幅度信号的运动单元,并且即使在高干扰信号等具有挑战性的条件下也表现良好。在模拟弹道收缩中,SCD检测到的运动单位是以前方法的三倍,同时提高了精度。这些进步可以改善运动、疲劳和神经系统疾病中肌肉功能的非侵入性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
期刊最新文献
Steady-state Purkinje cell activity has limited predictive power for cerebellar output in disease. TRIP8bnano peptide prevents cAMP binding to HCN2 channels alleviating pain-like behaviors in rats with neuropathic pain. Distinct distributions of myosin motor conformations during contraction of slow and fast skeletal muscle. Targeting mitochondrial stress in heart failure: Translocator protein TSPO modulation links mitochondria, redox signalling and cardiac protection. Physiological and anatomical determinants of placental drug transfer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1