Rebecca Brown, Laura M Nicolais, Kristiina E Hyrkas
{"title":"A Prospective Mixed Methods Study on Experiences of Mindfulness Intervention on Pain and Anxiety in Patients Undergoing a Colorectal Surgery.","authors":"Rebecca Brown, Laura M Nicolais, Kristiina E Hyrkas","doi":"10.1177/08980101251321963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the effectiveness and experiences of a mindfulness intervention in colorectal surgical patients. <b>Design of Study:</b> Descriptive mixed methods study. <b>Method:</b> Sixteen participants were provided with two or three 15-20-min mindfulness sessions. Data were collected before and after each session on blood pressure, heart and respiratory rate, anxiety, and pain. The participants were interviewed before their discharge. <b>Findings:</b> Eight participants (<i>n</i> = 8) received two and eight (<i>n</i> = 8) three sessions. Decreasing blood pressure and lower heart rates were noted after the sessions. Also, decreasing pain scores were found, especially in participants who attended two sessions. Minor decrease in anxiety scores were noticed in participants who attended three sessions. Two major themes emerged from the interviews: <i>healing and restoration of health</i> and <i>becoming in tune with self</i>. These themes were characterized by study participants' reflections on experience of recovery, progression to physical relaxation, pathway to serenity, awareness of emotions, evolution of perceptions and experiences of mindfulness. <b>Conclusions:</b> The physiological changes to mindfulness intervention, composed of two or three sessions, were minor and challenging to measure to demonstrate effects. However, study participants' experiences were very positive and suggest that this intervention could prove to be beneficial for colorectal surgical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"8980101251321963"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101251321963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and experiences of a mindfulness intervention in colorectal surgical patients. Design of Study: Descriptive mixed methods study. Method: Sixteen participants were provided with two or three 15-20-min mindfulness sessions. Data were collected before and after each session on blood pressure, heart and respiratory rate, anxiety, and pain. The participants were interviewed before their discharge. Findings: Eight participants (n = 8) received two and eight (n = 8) three sessions. Decreasing blood pressure and lower heart rates were noted after the sessions. Also, decreasing pain scores were found, especially in participants who attended two sessions. Minor decrease in anxiety scores were noticed in participants who attended three sessions. Two major themes emerged from the interviews: healing and restoration of health and becoming in tune with self. These themes were characterized by study participants' reflections on experience of recovery, progression to physical relaxation, pathway to serenity, awareness of emotions, evolution of perceptions and experiences of mindfulness. Conclusions: The physiological changes to mindfulness intervention, composed of two or three sessions, were minor and challenging to measure to demonstrate effects. However, study participants' experiences were very positive and suggest that this intervention could prove to be beneficial for colorectal surgical patients.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts are solicited that deal with the processes of knowledge development and application including research, concept analysis and theory development, practical applications of research and theory, clinical case studies and analysis, practice applications in general, educational approaches and evaluation, and aesthetic expressions of holistic knowledge. While the journal seeks to support work grounded in evidence, the editorial philosophy suggests that there are many diverse sources of “evidence” beyond the realm of what is called “empirical” and that many methods are appropriate for discovering evidence and generating knowledge.