Enterprise-led internet healthcare provision in China: insights from a leading platform.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1491183
Li Wang, Dan Liang, Hengqian HuangFu, Changwen Ke, Shaolong Wu, Yingsi Lai
{"title":"Enterprise-led internet healthcare provision in China: insights from a leading platform.","authors":"Li Wang, Dan Liang, Hengqian HuangFu, Changwen Ke, Shaolong Wu, Yingsi Lai","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1491183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>China's healthcare resources are limited and unevenly distributed, with a notable urban-rural gap. Enterprise-led internet healthcare platforms have become an important solution for optimizing resource allocation, improving accessibility, and enhancing efficiency in mainland China. However, detailed analysis of their online consultation services from both healthcare provider and patient perspectives is still lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The online consultation data of an enterprise-led internet healthcare platform was depicted and analyzed to understand the temporal trend and current situation of enterprise-led internet healthcare development in mainland China, which provided insights for the further development of internet healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We gathered information from an enterprise-led internet healthcare platform (i.e., Good Doctor Online) covering the period from January 2008 to December 2022, including the characteristics of doctors, healthcare institutions, and patients. Based on the above data, we sketched and analyzed the situation of online consultation services provided by the enterprise-led internet healthcare platform in mainland China.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 149,890 doctors from 7,584 healthcare institutions provided 40,462,801 online consultations from January 2008 to December 2022. Doctors and healthcare institutions providing online consultation services were primarily distributed in the economically developed eastern and southern provinces of China. Doctors with intermediate (30.15%) and senior titles (58.12%) were the main providers of online consultations and most doctors were from tertiary hospitals (88.18%). The consultation price {<i>median</i> [interquartile range (<i>IQR</i>)]} was 49.00 (15.00, 100.00) RMB. The health issues with the highest consultation frequency included upper respiratory tract infections or fever (16.19%), gynecological disorders (11.98%), and skin diseases (8.65%), with variations in gender and age. The age distribution of patients showed two peaks in age groups <5 years and 20-39 years, with the median age (IQR) 29.00 (19.00-43.00) years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enterprise-led internet healthcare platforms enhance access to care and reduce offline resource strain, especially during COVID-19. They mainly address non-urgent conditions but cannot fully replace in-person care. Policies should focus on increasing elderly participation, engaging senior doctors, optimizing male-oriented services, expanding access to underserved areas, standardizing pricing, and broadening insurance reimbursement coverage to improve equity and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1491183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1491183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: China's healthcare resources are limited and unevenly distributed, with a notable urban-rural gap. Enterprise-led internet healthcare platforms have become an important solution for optimizing resource allocation, improving accessibility, and enhancing efficiency in mainland China. However, detailed analysis of their online consultation services from both healthcare provider and patient perspectives is still lacking.

Objective: The online consultation data of an enterprise-led internet healthcare platform was depicted and analyzed to understand the temporal trend and current situation of enterprise-led internet healthcare development in mainland China, which provided insights for the further development of internet healthcare.

Methods: We gathered information from an enterprise-led internet healthcare platform (i.e., Good Doctor Online) covering the period from January 2008 to December 2022, including the characteristics of doctors, healthcare institutions, and patients. Based on the above data, we sketched and analyzed the situation of online consultation services provided by the enterprise-led internet healthcare platform in mainland China.

Results: A total of 149,890 doctors from 7,584 healthcare institutions provided 40,462,801 online consultations from January 2008 to December 2022. Doctors and healthcare institutions providing online consultation services were primarily distributed in the economically developed eastern and southern provinces of China. Doctors with intermediate (30.15%) and senior titles (58.12%) were the main providers of online consultations and most doctors were from tertiary hospitals (88.18%). The consultation price {median [interquartile range (IQR)]} was 49.00 (15.00, 100.00) RMB. The health issues with the highest consultation frequency included upper respiratory tract infections or fever (16.19%), gynecological disorders (11.98%), and skin diseases (8.65%), with variations in gender and age. The age distribution of patients showed two peaks in age groups <5 years and 20-39 years, with the median age (IQR) 29.00 (19.00-43.00) years.

Conclusions: Enterprise-led internet healthcare platforms enhance access to care and reduce offline resource strain, especially during COVID-19. They mainly address non-urgent conditions but cannot fully replace in-person care. Policies should focus on increasing elderly participation, engaging senior doctors, optimizing male-oriented services, expanding access to underserved areas, standardizing pricing, and broadening insurance reimbursement coverage to improve equity and sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国企业主导的互联网医疗服务:来自领先平台的见解。
背景:中国医疗资源有限且分布不均,城乡差距明显。企业主导的互联网医疗平台已成为中国大陆优化资源配置、提高可及性、提高效率的重要解决方案。然而,从医疗保健提供者和患者的角度对他们的在线咨询服务进行详细分析仍然缺乏。目的:对某企业主导的互联网医疗平台的在线咨询数据进行描述和分析,了解中国大陆企业主导的互联网医疗发展的时间趋势和现状,为互联网医疗的进一步发展提供参考。方法:收集企业主导的互联网医疗平台(即好医生在线)2008年1月至2022年12月期间的信息,包括医生、医疗机构和患者的特征。基于以上数据,我们对企业主导的互联网医疗平台在中国大陆提供在线咨询服务的情况进行了概述和分析。结果:2008年1月至2022年12月,共有7584家医疗机构的149890名医生提供了40462801次在线咨询。提供在线咨询服务的医生和医疗机构主要分布在经济发达的东部和南部省份。中级职称(30.15%)和高级职称(58.12%)的医生是网络咨询的主要提供者,大部分医生来自三级医院(88.18%)。咨询价格{中位数[四分位数间距(IQR)]}为49.00(15.00,100.00)元。咨询频率最高的健康问题包括上呼吸道感染或发烧(16.19%)、妇科疾病(11.98%)和皮肤病(8.65%),性别和年龄各不相同。结论:企业主导的互联网医疗平台提高了患者的就医可及性,减少了线下资源的紧张,特别是在COVID-19期间。它们主要处理非紧急情况,但不能完全取代亲自护理。政策应侧重于提高老年人参与、聘请资深医生、优化以男性为导向的服务、扩大服务不足地区的可及性、标准化定价和扩大保险报销范围,以提高公平性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Structuring medication safety narratives: development and evaluation of the medication-related incident reports annotation scheme. Use of digital patients in clinical simulation for nursing education: a scoping review protocol. From memorization to generalization: fine-tuning large language models for biomedical term-to-identifier normalization. Identifying needs in adult rehabilitation to support the clinical implementation of robotics and allied technologies: an Italian national survey. Single-item measures in digital mental healthcare: a mini narrative review of challenges and opportunities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1