Comparison of bacterial vaginosis symptoms reported in social media vs. those reported by patients.

IF 3.1 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2025.1549331
Andriana H Velmahos, Briah Cooley Demidkina, Caroline M Mitchell
{"title":"Comparison of bacterial vaginosis symptoms reported in social media vs. those reported by patients.","authors":"Andriana H Velmahos, Briah Cooley Demidkina, Caroline M Mitchell","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1549331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is an increasing tendency to seek health information online rather than through medical professionals. However, the easy accessibility of information online allows for an increased risk of encountering medical misinformation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared descriptions of symptomatology of bacterial vaginosis (BV) on four social media platforms: Instagram, Facebook, YouTube and X (Twitter). We then compared the frequency of discussion of symptoms with patients' report of symptoms in clinically diagnosed BV, vulvovaginal candidiasis and vulvodynia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Social media was more likely to report burning (45% of posts), itching (45%) or pain (23%) as symptoms of BV than patients (moderate-severe itching 30%, burning 21% or pain 21%). Although pain was reported more often by people with vulvodynia, other symptoms were not different across diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Social media overemphasizes the ability of symptoms to allow self-diagnosis of vaginitis, which can lead to delayed treatment, highlighting the need to promote accurate health information online.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1549331"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11906998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2025.1549331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is an increasing tendency to seek health information online rather than through medical professionals. However, the easy accessibility of information online allows for an increased risk of encountering medical misinformation.

Methods: We compared descriptions of symptomatology of bacterial vaginosis (BV) on four social media platforms: Instagram, Facebook, YouTube and X (Twitter). We then compared the frequency of discussion of symptoms with patients' report of symptoms in clinically diagnosed BV, vulvovaginal candidiasis and vulvodynia.

Results: Social media was more likely to report burning (45% of posts), itching (45%) or pain (23%) as symptoms of BV than patients (moderate-severe itching 30%, burning 21% or pain 21%). Although pain was reported more often by people with vulvodynia, other symptoms were not different across diagnoses.

Discussion: Social media overemphasizes the ability of symptoms to allow self-diagnosis of vaginitis, which can lead to delayed treatment, highlighting the need to promote accurate health information online.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体报道的细菌性阴道病症状与患者报告的症状对比。
导言:越来越多的人倾向于在网上而不是通过医疗专业人员寻求健康信息。然而,网上信息的容易获取增加了遇到医疗错误信息的风险。方法:比较Instagram、Facebook、YouTube和X (Twitter)四个社交媒体平台上细菌性阴道病(BV)的症状描述。然后,我们比较了临床诊断为细菌性阴道炎、外阴阴道念珠菌病和外阴痛的患者讨论症状的频率与患者报告症状的频率。结果:社交媒体更有可能报告灼烧(45%的帖子),瘙痒(45%)或疼痛(23%)作为BV症状,而患者(中度-重度瘙痒30%,灼烧21%或疼痛21%)。尽管外阴痛患者更常报告疼痛,但其他症状在诊断中并没有不同。讨论:社交媒体过分强调症状对阴道炎的自我诊断能力,这可能导致治疗延误,强调需要在网上推广准确的健康信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Infant feeding decisions among people living with human immunodeficiency virus in the United States: a pilot study. Endometrial dysfunction in embryo implantation: from molecular mechanisms to clinical management. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice gap in female condoms utilization among future health professionals. A cross-sectional study. Female sexual dysfunction among foreign and Australian-born women: a cross-sectional study. Potential increase of the U.S. total fertility rate resulting from restorative treatment of unresolved subfertility: a simulation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1