Socioeconomic Disparities in Accessing Early Newborn Care in Pakistan: Secondary Data Analysis of Nationally Representative Sample.

IF 1.7 Q3 PEDIATRICS Turkish archives of pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24303
Rakhshanda Ayub Khan, Owais Raza, Mansoor Ahmed, Sidra Zaheer
{"title":"Socioeconomic Disparities in Accessing Early Newborn Care in Pakistan: Secondary Data Analysis of Nationally Representative Sample.","authors":"Rakhshanda Ayub Khan, Owais Raza, Mansoor Ahmed, Sidra Zaheer","doi":"10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective: Pakistan ranks third in newborn mortality. The study aims to examine any socioeconomic disparities in 48-hour newborn care practices in Pakistan using 6 signal functions. Materials and Methods: Using R (version 4.3.1), a secondary analysis of 3936 mothers' Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2017-2018 data was performed. Newborn care practices in 48 hours of life were measured using 6 indicators: cord examination, temperature measurement, danger sign counseling, breastfeeding counseling, breastfeeding observation, and weight measurement. The outcome variable was defined as completing at least 2 signal functions. The frequencies of explanatory variables were estimated using descriptive analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed between independent variables and at least 2 signal functions. Results: Among mothers practicing the most newborn care, 71.8% were from urban areas, 81.9% were among the richest, 68.9% had institutional deliveries, 71.3% had 4 or more antenatal care (ANC) visits, 81.5% had cesarean sections (C-sections), and 68.1% were attended by skilled birth attendants. After adjusting for covariates, the likelihood of having at least 2 signal functions was 2.46 times greater for C-sections and 1.58 times greater for institutional deliveries, 2.41 times more probable for mothers with over 4 ANC visits, 1.75 times more likely for those with skilled birth attendants, and 1.64 times more common for the richest mothers. Conclusion: Wealth, C-sections, institutional births, skilled birth attendants, and frequent ANC visits were related to higher care levels, indicating the need for targeted measures in vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":75267,"journal":{"name":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","volume":"60 2","pages":"208-216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pakistan ranks third in newborn mortality. The study aims to examine any socioeconomic disparities in 48-hour newborn care practices in Pakistan using 6 signal functions. Materials and Methods: Using R (version 4.3.1), a secondary analysis of 3936 mothers' Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2017-2018 data was performed. Newborn care practices in 48 hours of life were measured using 6 indicators: cord examination, temperature measurement, danger sign counseling, breastfeeding counseling, breastfeeding observation, and weight measurement. The outcome variable was defined as completing at least 2 signal functions. The frequencies of explanatory variables were estimated using descriptive analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed between independent variables and at least 2 signal functions. Results: Among mothers practicing the most newborn care, 71.8% were from urban areas, 81.9% were among the richest, 68.9% had institutional deliveries, 71.3% had 4 or more antenatal care (ANC) visits, 81.5% had cesarean sections (C-sections), and 68.1% were attended by skilled birth attendants. After adjusting for covariates, the likelihood of having at least 2 signal functions was 2.46 times greater for C-sections and 1.58 times greater for institutional deliveries, 2.41 times more probable for mothers with over 4 ANC visits, 1.75 times more likely for those with skilled birth attendants, and 1.64 times more common for the richest mothers. Conclusion: Wealth, C-sections, institutional births, skilled birth attendants, and frequent ANC visits were related to higher care levels, indicating the need for targeted measures in vulnerable populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦获得早期新生儿护理的社会经济差异:全国代表性样本的二次数据分析。
目标:巴基斯坦在新生儿死亡率方面排名第三。该研究旨在使用6个信号函数检查巴基斯坦48小时新生儿护理实践中的任何社会经济差异。材料与方法:使用R(4.3.1版本)对2017-2018年巴基斯坦人口与健康调查3936名母亲的数据进行二次分析。采用脐带检查、体温测量、危险信号咨询、母乳喂养咨询、母乳喂养观察、体重测量6项指标,对新生儿48小时的护理实践情况进行评价。结果变量定义为完成至少2个信号函数。使用描述性分析估计解释变量的频率。在自变量与至少2个信号函数之间进行多元逻辑回归。结果:在接受新生儿护理最多的母亲中,71.8%来自城市地区,81.9%来自最富裕地区,68.9%在医院分娩,71.3%进行过4次及以上产前护理(ANC), 81.5%进行过剖宫产(C-sections), 68.1%由熟练助产士接生。在调整协变量后,至少有2个信号函数的可能性在剖腹产中是2.46倍,在机构分娩中是1.58倍,在ANC访问超过4次的母亲中是2.41倍,在熟练的助产士中是1.75倍,在最富有的母亲中是1.64倍。结论:财富、剖腹产、机构分娩、熟练助产士和频繁ANC就诊与较高的护理水平有关,表明需要针对弱势群体采取针对性措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can Folinic Acid Be a Treatment Option for Autism? Emapalumab as a Life-Saving Therapy for Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Refractory Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis with Trisomy 21. Evaluating the Use of Nasal Epinephrine in Anaphylaxis: Current Status. Comment on "Underserved and Undervalued: The Alarming Collapse in Pediatric Residency Preference in Türkiye". Adverse Event Profiles of Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen in Infants: A Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1