Invisalign ClinCheck can predict open gingival embrasures in adult extraction cases: a pilot study.

IF 3.2 The Angle orthodontist Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.2319/091424-752.1
Feng Guo, Chenxu Wang, Lei Han, Houxuan Li, Lang Lei, Li Mei
{"title":"Invisalign ClinCheck can predict open gingival embrasures in adult extraction cases: a pilot study.","authors":"Feng Guo, Chenxu Wang, Lei Han, Houxuan Li, Lang Lei, Li Mei","doi":"10.2319/091424-752.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of Invisalign ClinCheck in predicting open gingival embrasures (OGEs) and to identify predictors of OGEs in adult extraction cases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-seven adult patients treated with Invisalign and four first premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. OGEs were measured in maxillary and mandibular anterior regions using posttreatment intraoral photographs (actual OGEs) and the final step from the first treatment plan in ClinCheck (predicted OGEs). Prediction performance indicators including precision, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, false negative rate, and accuracy were evaluated at each tooth site. Predictors of OGEs (age, crowding, crown morphology, tooth movement, tooth site, treatment duration, and attachment design) were analyzed using binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Incidence of actual OGEs was like that of the ClinCheck predicted OGEs in the maxillary and mandibular anterior regions. The predictability of ClinCheck was satisfactory in both the maxilla and mandible, with accuracy rates of 94.0% and 86.0%, respectively. The most accurate prediction was for the maxillary central incisors, achieving a precision of 100% and an accuracy of 96.6%. The most significant predictors of OGEs included patient age at initial consultation, anterior crowding, tooth crown morphology, and type of tooth movement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Invisalign ClinCheck predicted OGEs in adult patients treated with four premolar extractions. The accuracy of the prediction was satisfactory, 94% in the maxilla and 86% in the mandible, demonstrating great potential for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"389-396"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/091424-752.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of Invisalign ClinCheck in predicting open gingival embrasures (OGEs) and to identify predictors of OGEs in adult extraction cases.

Materials and methods: Fifty-seven adult patients treated with Invisalign and four first premolar extractions were included in this retrospective study. OGEs were measured in maxillary and mandibular anterior regions using posttreatment intraoral photographs (actual OGEs) and the final step from the first treatment plan in ClinCheck (predicted OGEs). Prediction performance indicators including precision, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, false negative rate, and accuracy were evaluated at each tooth site. Predictors of OGEs (age, crowding, crown morphology, tooth movement, tooth site, treatment duration, and attachment design) were analyzed using binary logistic regression.

Results: Incidence of actual OGEs was like that of the ClinCheck predicted OGEs in the maxillary and mandibular anterior regions. The predictability of ClinCheck was satisfactory in both the maxilla and mandible, with accuracy rates of 94.0% and 86.0%, respectively. The most accurate prediction was for the maxillary central incisors, achieving a precision of 100% and an accuracy of 96.6%. The most significant predictors of OGEs included patient age at initial consultation, anterior crowding, tooth crown morphology, and type of tooth movement.

Conclusions: Invisalign ClinCheck predicted OGEs in adult patients treated with four premolar extractions. The accuracy of the prediction was satisfactory, 94% in the maxilla and 86% in the mandible, demonstrating great potential for clinical application.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Invisalign ClinCheck可以预测成人拔牙病例中开放的牙龈囊膜:一项初步研究。
目的:评价Invisalign ClinCheck预测成人拔牙病例开放式龈囊的准确性,并确定龈囊的预测因素。材料和方法:回顾性研究了57例使用Invisalign和4例第一前磨牙拔牙治疗的成人患者。使用治疗后的口内照片(实际OGEs)和ClinCheck中第一次治疗计划的最后一步(预测OGEs)测量上颌和下颌前区OGEs。对各牙位的预测性能指标包括精度、敏感性、特异性、假阳性率、假阴性率和准确性进行评估。使用二元逻辑回归分析OGEs的预测因子(年龄、拥挤程度、冠形态、牙齿运动、牙齿位置、治疗持续时间和附着体设计)。结果:上颌、下颌前区实际OGEs发生率与ClinCheck预测OGEs发生率基本一致。ClinCheck在上颌和下颌骨的可预测性均令人满意,准确率分别为94.0%和86.0%。上颌中切牙的预测精度为100%,准确率为96.6%。最重要的预测因素包括患者初诊时的年龄、前牙拥挤、牙冠形态和牙齿运动类型。结论:Invisalign ClinCheck预测四颗前磨牙拔牙的成人患者的oge。上颌预测准确率为94%,下颌骨预测准确率为86%,具有较好的临床应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Facial profile and nasolabial angle-upper incisor relationship: effects of miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction therapy in adolescents. Comparison of dentoskeletal effects of elastic chain vs metallic ligature for miniscrew-anchored Herbst appliance: a retrospective study. Assessment of three different techniques in correcting deep overbite: a prospective clinical study. Mechanobehavior and mandibular growth in children with Class II skeletal malocclusions. Effects of simulated arch constriction on upper airway function during sleep.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1