A Multi-model approach for remote sensing-based actual evapotranspiration mapping using Google Earth Engine (ETMapper-GEE)

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133062
Abdelrazek Elnashar , Shahab Aldin Shojaeezadeh , Tobias Karl David Weber
{"title":"A Multi-model approach for remote sensing-based actual evapotranspiration mapping using Google Earth Engine (ETMapper-GEE)","authors":"Abdelrazek Elnashar ,&nbsp;Shahab Aldin Shojaeezadeh ,&nbsp;Tobias Karl David Weber","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate estimation of actual evapotranspiration (ET<sub>a</sub>) through remote sensing (RS) is essential for effective large-scale water management. We developed an EvapoTranspiration Mapper in the Google Earth Engine environment (ETMapper-GEE) to estimate RS-ET<sub>a</sub> using Landsat satellite data employing four models: Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL), Mapping EvapoTranspiration at high Resolution with Internalized Calibration (METRIC), surface temperature-vegetation-based triangle (TriAng), and Operational Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SSEBop). The estimation integrates extrapolation approaches (Evaporative Fraction (EF) and EvapoTranspiration Fraction (ETF)), reference ET types (grass (ET<sub>o</sub>) and alfalfa (ET<sub>r</sub>)), and climate forcing datasets (the fifth generation of the European ReAnalysis (ERA5-Land) and the Climate Forecast System version 2 (CFSv2)). The ETMapper was evaluated against observed data from flux towers in Germany for the period 2020 to 2022. The results showed that EF outperformed the ETF approach, with a more than an 8 % higher correlation of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) and 35 % lower Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) compared to the other approaches. Among the EF approaches, TriAng (RMSE = 1.38 mm d<sup>-1</sup>) exhibited the best performance, followed by METRIC (1.69 mm d<sup>-1</sup>) and SEBAL (2.07 mm d<sup>-1</sup>). Using ETMapper with ET<sub>o</sub> resulted in at least 4 % higher R<sup>2</sup> and reduction in RMSE by at least 29 % compared to ET<sub>r</sub>. Forcing ETMapper with ERA5 yielded better accuracy (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 4 %, RMSE &lt; 12 %) than when using CFSv2. This study provides an integrated framework for RS-ET<sub>a</sub> estimation, supporting water-related Sustainable Development Goals, especially in agricultural contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"657 ","pages":"Article 133062"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425004007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimation of actual evapotranspiration (ETa) through remote sensing (RS) is essential for effective large-scale water management. We developed an EvapoTranspiration Mapper in the Google Earth Engine environment (ETMapper-GEE) to estimate RS-ETa using Landsat satellite data employing four models: Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL), Mapping EvapoTranspiration at high Resolution with Internalized Calibration (METRIC), surface temperature-vegetation-based triangle (TriAng), and Operational Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SSEBop). The estimation integrates extrapolation approaches (Evaporative Fraction (EF) and EvapoTranspiration Fraction (ETF)), reference ET types (grass (ETo) and alfalfa (ETr)), and climate forcing datasets (the fifth generation of the European ReAnalysis (ERA5-Land) and the Climate Forecast System version 2 (CFSv2)). The ETMapper was evaluated against observed data from flux towers in Germany for the period 2020 to 2022. The results showed that EF outperformed the ETF approach, with a more than an 8 % higher correlation of determination (R2) and 35 % lower Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) compared to the other approaches. Among the EF approaches, TriAng (RMSE = 1.38 mm d-1) exhibited the best performance, followed by METRIC (1.69 mm d-1) and SEBAL (2.07 mm d-1). Using ETMapper with ETo resulted in at least 4 % higher R2 and reduction in RMSE by at least 29 % compared to ETr. Forcing ETMapper with ERA5 yielded better accuracy (R2 > 4 %, RMSE < 12 %) than when using CFSv2. This study provides an integrated framework for RS-ETa estimation, supporting water-related Sustainable Development Goals, especially in agricultural contexts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于谷歌Earth Engine (ETMapper-GEE)的多模型遥感实际蒸散发制图方法
通过遥感准确估算实际蒸散量对有效的大规模水资源管理至关重要。我们在谷歌Earth Engine环境下开发了一款蒸散发成像仪(ETMapper-GEE),利用Landsat卫星数据估算RS-ETa,采用四种模型:陆地表面能量平衡算法(SEBAL)、基于内部校准的高分辨率蒸散发制图(METRIC)、基于地表温度-植被的三角形(TriAng)和操作性简化表面能量平衡(SSEBop)。估算综合了外推方法(蒸发分数(EF)和蒸散发分数(ETF))、参考蒸散发类型(草(ETo)和苜蓿(ETr))和气候强迫数据集(第五代欧洲再分析(ERA5-Land)和气候预报系统第2版(CFSv2))。根据2020年至2022年德国通量塔的观测数据对ETMapper进行了评估。结果表明,EF优于ETF方法,与其他方法相比,其决定相关系数(R2)高出8%以上,均方根误差(RMSE)降低35%。其中,TriAng (RMSE = 1.38 mm d-1)的效果最好,其次是METRIC (1.69 mm d-1)和SEBAL (2.07 mm d-1)。与ETr相比,使用ETMapper与ETo相比,R2至少提高4%,RMSE至少降低29%。使用ERA5强迫ETMapper获得了更好的精度(R2 >;4%, RMSE <;12%),比使用CFSv2时。本研究为RS-ETa估算提供了一个综合框架,支持与水相关的可持续发展目标,特别是在农业背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
An exact solution for steady subsurface irrigation with free boundary A flood peak prediction in data-scarce mountain river basins considering the time distribution of rainfall A new approach for groundwater fluxes assessment in alluvial aquifers using active-DTS with a Brillouin-based sensor Latitude/elevation-dependent response of snow phenology to climate change in the Northern Hemisphere from 1972 to 2022 Daily river water levels from multi-mission altimetry: A reach-based regression method using the unique SWOT data geometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1