Clinical and radiographic outcomes of surgical management for leg length inequality after primary total hip arthroplasty

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1007/s00402-025-05807-x
Mattia Loppini, Alberto Bulgarelli, Katia Chiappetta, Emanuela Morenghi, Francesco La Camera, Guido Grappiolo
{"title":"Clinical and radiographic outcomes of surgical management for leg length inequality after primary total hip arthroplasty","authors":"Mattia Loppini,&nbsp;Alberto Bulgarelli,&nbsp;Katia Chiappetta,&nbsp;Emanuela Morenghi,&nbsp;Francesco La Camera,&nbsp;Guido Grappiolo","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05807-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Limb length inequality (LLI) is a leading cause of patient dissatisfaction and litigation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the surgical treatment of this complication remains controversial. In this retrospective and observational study, we evaluated the results obtained from 31 patients who underwent revision surgery for symptomatic LLI after conservative treatment had failed. Our primary endpoint was the radiographic correction of LLI. Secondary endpoints included assessing the improvement in quality of life (QoL) after surgical treatment [using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12)] and tracking possible complications (e.g., dislocation, residual instability).</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Type of surgery, implanted materials, preoperative sciatic nerve deficit, and the development of postoperative complications were recorded. Radiographic assessment was performed by measuring LLI, Femoral Offset (FO), Acetabular Offset (AO), Global Offset (GO), and height of the Center of Rotation (CORL), and calculating the difference with the contralateral side and postoperative measurements. Clinical assessment was performed by having patients answer to the HHS and the SF-12, which comprises a Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS-12).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>LLI, GO, and CORL showed a statistically significant variation between preoperatory and postoperatory radiographs. The same was found to apply also to clinical results, the HHS, and the SF-12. Linear regression analysis showed a single association between sex and postoperative HHS. No other association was found to be statistically significant.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In selected patients who have symptomatic structural LLI after primary THA, revision surgery can be a valid approach to restore the proper limb length and to improve the clinical outcomes with an acceptable risk of complications and instability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05807-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Limb length inequality (LLI) is a leading cause of patient dissatisfaction and litigation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the surgical treatment of this complication remains controversial. In this retrospective and observational study, we evaluated the results obtained from 31 patients who underwent revision surgery for symptomatic LLI after conservative treatment had failed. Our primary endpoint was the radiographic correction of LLI. Secondary endpoints included assessing the improvement in quality of life (QoL) after surgical treatment [using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12)] and tracking possible complications (e.g., dislocation, residual instability).

Materials and methods

Type of surgery, implanted materials, preoperative sciatic nerve deficit, and the development of postoperative complications were recorded. Radiographic assessment was performed by measuring LLI, Femoral Offset (FO), Acetabular Offset (AO), Global Offset (GO), and height of the Center of Rotation (CORL), and calculating the difference with the contralateral side and postoperative measurements. Clinical assessment was performed by having patients answer to the HHS and the SF-12, which comprises a Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS-12).

Results

LLI, GO, and CORL showed a statistically significant variation between preoperatory and postoperatory radiographs. The same was found to apply also to clinical results, the HHS, and the SF-12. Linear regression analysis showed a single association between sex and postoperative HHS. No other association was found to be statistically significant.

Conclusions

In selected patients who have symptomatic structural LLI after primary THA, revision surgery can be a valid approach to restore the proper limb length and to improve the clinical outcomes with an acceptable risk of complications and instability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级全髋关节置换术后腿长不等手术治疗的临床和影像学结果
背景:肢长不平等(LLI)是全髋关节置换术(THA)后患者不满和诉讼的主要原因。然而,这种并发症的手术治疗仍然存在争议。在这项回顾性和观察性研究中,我们评估了31例在保守治疗失败后接受翻修手术治疗症状性LLI的患者的结果。我们的主要终点是LLI的影像学矫正。次要终点包括评估手术治疗后生活质量(QoL)的改善[使用Harris髋关节评分(HHS)和12项简短问卷调查(SF-12)]和跟踪可能的并发症(如脱位、残余不稳定)。材料与方法记录手术方式、植入材料、术前坐骨神经缺损及术后并发症发生情况。通过测量LLI、股骨偏移量(FO)、髋臼偏移量(AO)、整体偏移量(GO)和旋转中心高度(CORL)进行影像学评估,并计算与对侧和术后测量值的差异。临床评估是通过让患者回答HHS和SF-12进行的,SF-12包括身体成分摘要(PCS-12)和精神成分摘要(MCS-12)。结果slli、GO、CORL术前、术后x线片差异有统计学意义。同样的发现也适用于临床结果、HHS和SF-12。线性回归分析显示性别与术后HHS之间存在单一关联。没有发现其他关联具有统计学意义。结论对于原发性THA术后出现症状性结构性LLI的患者,翻修手术是一种有效的方法,可以在可接受的并发症和不稳定性风险下恢复适当的肢体长度,改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Comparative assessment of the reaming characteristics of two different technologies for intramedullary bone graft harvesting Different sagittal cutting plane orientations do not affect posterior tibial slope in open wedge high tibial osteotomy: a Sawbone model study External fixation versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures in the elderly: a retrospective comparative study Post-traumatic Candida infection leading to bilateral wrist rice body tenosynovitis: a case report and literature review Differences in pelvic tilt and spinal alignment according to age in patients with hip dysplasia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1