Evaluation of the implementation of the minimally invasive emergency procedure REBOA via an open surgical approach in a teaching unit – a cadaveric study

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s00402-025-05786-z
Peter Grechenig, Barbara Hallmann, Nicolas Eibinger, Amir Koutp, Rene Schroedter, Gerald Höfler, Paul Puchwein
{"title":"Evaluation of the implementation of the minimally invasive emergency procedure REBOA via an open surgical approach in a teaching unit – a cadaveric study","authors":"Peter Grechenig,&nbsp;Barbara Hallmann,&nbsp;Nicolas Eibinger,&nbsp;Amir Koutp,&nbsp;Rene Schroedter,&nbsp;Gerald Höfler,&nbsp;Paul Puchwein","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05786-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an increasingly used trauma resuscitation procedure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the open surgical technique in a cardiac arrest model.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Thirty-one fresh cadavers were included in the study. 46 times the open arterial cutdown for the emergency procedure REBOA were performed and evaluated by physicians from a level I. trauma center.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>For open arterial cutdown time from skin incision to blocking the balloon in averaged 340.6 s (SD: 136.6; range: 178–600) and the balloon was correctly positioned and blocked 37 times (80.4%; 37/46) and failed 9 times (19.6%; 9/46).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study vividly demonstrates that in patients in severe shock or cardiac arrest condition, the open surgical puncture for the implications of the REBOA catheter is a good and safe alternative to the percutaneous ultrasound-targeted technique.</p><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level V, Cadaveric Study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-05786-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an increasingly used trauma resuscitation procedure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the open surgical technique in a cardiac arrest model.

Materials and methods

Thirty-one fresh cadavers were included in the study. 46 times the open arterial cutdown for the emergency procedure REBOA were performed and evaluated by physicians from a level I. trauma center.

Results

For open arterial cutdown time from skin incision to blocking the balloon in averaged 340.6 s (SD: 136.6; range: 178–600) and the balloon was correctly positioned and blocked 37 times (80.4%; 37/46) and failed 9 times (19.6%; 9/46).

Conclusions

This study vividly demonstrates that in patients in severe shock or cardiac arrest condition, the open surgical puncture for the implications of the REBOA catheter is a good and safe alternative to the percutaneous ultrasound-targeted technique.

Level of Evidence

Level V, Cadaveric Study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过开放手术入路在教学单位实施微创急诊手术REBOA的评估——一项尸体研究
复苏血管内球囊阻断主动脉(REBOA)是一种越来越多使用的创伤复苏程序。本研究的目的是评估开放手术技术在心脏骤停模型中的应用。材料与方法选取31具新鲜尸体作为研究对象。在急诊手术REBOA中,由一级创伤中心的医生进行了46次切开动脉手术并进行了评估。结果从皮肤切口到阻断球囊的切开时间平均为340.6 s (SD: 136.6;范围:178-600),球囊定位正确,堵塞37次(80.4%;37/46),失败9次(19.6%;9/46)。结论本研究生动地表明,对于严重休克或心脏骤停的患者,开放手术穿刺置管REBOA是一种良好且安全的替代经皮超声靶向技术。证据等级:V级,尸体研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence in orthopedic trauma surgery: a scoping review of current applications and research gaps. Comparative evaluation of additively manufactured PLA models as cost-effective, non-inferior alternatives to composite bones for pull-out testing. Combined iPACK and adductor canal block versus two-level erector spinae plane block in elderly patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, triple-blinded clinical trial. Can EOS and lateral pelvic radiographs reliably identify patient with reduced pelvic roll back at risk for dislocation ? Concurrent validation of a novel intraoperative navigation platform for total knee arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1