Evaluating the impact of an educational self-care intervention on the empowerment of primigravida pregnant women covered by family medicine program in the Estahban City -an application of the Pender's health promotion model.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07437-y
Zahra Rezaei, Zahra Yazdanpanahi, Abdolrahim Asadollahi, Masoud Karimi, Leila Ghahremani
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of an educational self-care intervention on the empowerment of primigravida pregnant women covered by family medicine program in the Estahban City -an application of the Pender's health promotion model.","authors":"Zahra Rezaei, Zahra Yazdanpanahi, Abdolrahim Asadollahi, Masoud Karimi, Leila Ghahremani","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07437-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pregnancy and childbirth are stages in a woman's life that are associated with many different changes. These changes make normal pregnancy stressful and, if not adequately attended to, can have various irreparable effects on the fetus and the mother. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the effect of an educational self-care intervention on the empowerment of primigravida pregnant women in the GP program in the city of Estahban.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present study was a randomized controlled trial. The sample included 80 pregnant primigravida women with a gestational age of 14-28 weeks. The samples were randomly selected and divided into an intervention group (n = 40) and a control group (n = 40). The method of sample selection for the generalizability of the study results and the maximum reduction of the socio-economic differences of the samples of the two control and experimental groups were selected from 4 health centers based in a simple random method, 2 centers along with the covered bases were selected as the control group and two other comprehensive health centers along with the covered bases were selected as the experimental group. In the selected databases, the names of eligible people were listed from the SIB system and among the mothers eligible to enter the study, 40 people were randomly considered as the control group and 40 people as the intervention group. Six sessions were held for the intervention group; however, the control group received no training. A posttest was conducted 1 month after the educational intervention for both the intervention and control groups. The data were analyzed via 3 questionnaires (demographic data, Kameda Empowerment of Pregnant Women and Self-Assessed Self-Care Empowerment in Pregnancy (SSAP)) and SPSS version 27 as well as chi-square tests, independent t-tests and paired t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One month after the intervention, a significant difference was observed in all the constructs of the Pender health promotion model and empowerment subscales compared to with those of the control group (p < 0.001). In the in-group comparison in the intervention group, although no significant differences were observed in the interpersonal influence structure and future image, social support or joy in addition to the family subscales, the mean scores increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-care interventions based on Pender's health promotion model can increase the ability of pregnant primigravida women to address common problems during pregnancy and thus improve pregnancy outcomes. To achieve significant changes in the interpersonal influence structure and future image, social support and the joy of an addition to the family subscales, more educational sessions, together with their trusted supporters, including their husbands, are emphasized.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Before starting the current research, it was registered in the clinical trial portal with the specifications of the clinical code Trial Id: 73547, IRCT Id: IRCT20131014015015N23, Registration date: 2023-11-10, 1402/08/19 and Membership number: 15015.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07437-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnancy and childbirth are stages in a woman's life that are associated with many different changes. These changes make normal pregnancy stressful and, if not adequately attended to, can have various irreparable effects on the fetus and the mother. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the effect of an educational self-care intervention on the empowerment of primigravida pregnant women in the GP program in the city of Estahban.

Materials and methods: The present study was a randomized controlled trial. The sample included 80 pregnant primigravida women with a gestational age of 14-28 weeks. The samples were randomly selected and divided into an intervention group (n = 40) and a control group (n = 40). The method of sample selection for the generalizability of the study results and the maximum reduction of the socio-economic differences of the samples of the two control and experimental groups were selected from 4 health centers based in a simple random method, 2 centers along with the covered bases were selected as the control group and two other comprehensive health centers along with the covered bases were selected as the experimental group. In the selected databases, the names of eligible people were listed from the SIB system and among the mothers eligible to enter the study, 40 people were randomly considered as the control group and 40 people as the intervention group. Six sessions were held for the intervention group; however, the control group received no training. A posttest was conducted 1 month after the educational intervention for both the intervention and control groups. The data were analyzed via 3 questionnaires (demographic data, Kameda Empowerment of Pregnant Women and Self-Assessed Self-Care Empowerment in Pregnancy (SSAP)) and SPSS version 27 as well as chi-square tests, independent t-tests and paired t-tests.

Results: One month after the intervention, a significant difference was observed in all the constructs of the Pender health promotion model and empowerment subscales compared to with those of the control group (p < 0.001). In the in-group comparison in the intervention group, although no significant differences were observed in the interpersonal influence structure and future image, social support or joy in addition to the family subscales, the mean scores increased.

Conclusion: Self-care interventions based on Pender's health promotion model can increase the ability of pregnant primigravida women to address common problems during pregnancy and thus improve pregnancy outcomes. To achieve significant changes in the interpersonal influence structure and future image, social support and the joy of an addition to the family subscales, more educational sessions, together with their trusted supporters, including their husbands, are emphasized.

Trial registration: Before starting the current research, it was registered in the clinical trial portal with the specifications of the clinical code Trial Id: 73547, IRCT Id: IRCT20131014015015N23, Registration date: 2023-11-10, 1402/08/19 and Membership number: 15015.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估教育自我保健干预对埃斯塔班市家庭医疗方案所涵盖的初产妇赋权的影响——彭德健康促进模式的应用。
引言:怀孕和分娩是女性一生中与许多不同变化相关的阶段。这些变化使正常妊娠充满压力,如果不加以适当处理,可能对胎儿和母亲产生各种不可弥补的影响。因此,本研究的目的是评估教育自我保健干预对埃斯塔班市全科医生项目中初产妇赋权的影响。材料与方法:本研究为随机对照试验。样本包括80名孕龄为14-28周的妊娠初迁妇女。随机抽取样本,分为干预组(n = 40)和对照组(n = 40)。为了研究结果的普遍性和最大限度地缩小两个对照组和试验组样本的社会经济差异,采用简单随机方法从4个卫生中心中选择2个中心和覆盖基地作为对照组,另外2个综合卫生中心和覆盖基地作为实验组。在所选择的数据库中,从SIB系统中列出符合条件的人的名字,在符合条件的母亲中,随机选取40人作为对照组,40人作为干预组。干预组举行了六次会议;然而,对照组没有接受任何训练。干预组和对照组在教育干预后1个月进行后测。数据分析采用人口统计学、孕妇Kameda赋权和妊娠期自我护理赋权(SSAP) 3份问卷和SPSS 27版,并采用卡方检验、独立t检验和配对t检验。结果:干预1个月后,Pender健康促进模型和赋权子量表的各构式与对照组相比均有显著差异(p)。结论:基于Pender健康促进模型的自我保健干预可提高初迁孕妇解决妊娠期常见问题的能力,从而改善妊娠结局。为了实现人际影响结构和未来形象的重大变化,社会支持和增加家庭分量表的喜悦,强调与她们信任的支持者(包括她们的丈夫)一起进行更多的教育课程。试验注册:本研究开始前,已在临床试验门户网站注册,临床代码:试验Id: 73547, IRCT Id: IRCT20131014015015N23,注册日期:2023-11-10,142/08/19,会员号:15015。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Association between maternal thyroid function and adverse outcomes of pregnant women and offspring: evidence from an umbrella review. The impact of Vaginal Flora Screening in the third trimester on pregnancy outcomes in primiparas undergoing vaginal delivery: a retrospective cohort study. Iron supplementation-induced modulation of hepcidin, erythroferrone, and oxidative balance in iron-deficient pregnant women. Feasibility and safety of intrapartum foetal pulse oximetry using a disposable scalp probe: a cross-sectional study. The relationship between pregnant women's perception of traumatic birth and their vaginal birth self-efficacy: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1