Evaluating methods to define place of residence in Canadian administrative data and the impact on observed associations with all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Medical Research Methodology Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1186/s12874-025-02531-3
Danielle K Nagy, Lauren C Bresee, Dean T Eurich, Scot H Simpson
{"title":"Evaluating methods to define place of residence in Canadian administrative data and the impact on observed associations with all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Danielle K Nagy, Lauren C Bresee, Dean T Eurich, Scot H Simpson","doi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02531-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>An individual's location of residence may impact health, however, health services and outcomes research generally use a single point in time to define where an individual resides. While this estimate of residence becomes inaccurate when the study subject moves, the impact on observed associations is not known. This study quantifies the impact of different methods to define residence (rural, urban, metropolitan) on the association with all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A diabetes cohort of new metformin users was identified from administrative data in Alberta, Canada between 2008 and 2019. An individual's residence (rural/urban/metropolitan) was defined from postal codes using 4 different methods: residence defined at 1-year before first metformin (this served as the reference model), comparison 1- stable residence for 3 years before first metformin, comparison 2- residence as time-varying (during the outcome observation window), and comparison 3 - nested case control (residence closest to the index date after identifying cases and controls). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models were constructed to examine the association between residence definitions and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 157,146 new metformin users (mean age of 55 years and 57% male) and 8,444 (5%) deaths occurred during the mean follow up of 4.7 (SD 2.3) years. There were few instances of moving after first metformin; 2.6% of individuals moved to a smaller centre (metropolitan to urban or rural, or urban to rural) and 3.1% moved to a larger centre (rural to urban or metropolitan, or urban to metropolitan). The association between rural residence and all-cause mortality was consistent (aHR:1.18; 95%CI:1.12-1.24), regardless of the method used to define residence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The method used to define residence in a population of adults newly treated with metformin for type 2 diabetes has minimal impact on measures of all-cause mortality, possibly due to infrequent migration. The observed association between residence and mortality is compelling but requires further investigation and more robust analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"25 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02531-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: An individual's location of residence may impact health, however, health services and outcomes research generally use a single point in time to define where an individual resides. While this estimate of residence becomes inaccurate when the study subject moves, the impact on observed associations is not known. This study quantifies the impact of different methods to define residence (rural, urban, metropolitan) on the association with all-cause mortality.

Methods: A diabetes cohort of new metformin users was identified from administrative data in Alberta, Canada between 2008 and 2019. An individual's residence (rural/urban/metropolitan) was defined from postal codes using 4 different methods: residence defined at 1-year before first metformin (this served as the reference model), comparison 1- stable residence for 3 years before first metformin, comparison 2- residence as time-varying (during the outcome observation window), and comparison 3 - nested case control (residence closest to the index date after identifying cases and controls). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models were constructed to examine the association between residence definitions and all-cause mortality.

Results: We identified 157,146 new metformin users (mean age of 55 years and 57% male) and 8,444 (5%) deaths occurred during the mean follow up of 4.7 (SD 2.3) years. There were few instances of moving after first metformin; 2.6% of individuals moved to a smaller centre (metropolitan to urban or rural, or urban to rural) and 3.1% moved to a larger centre (rural to urban or metropolitan, or urban to metropolitan). The association between rural residence and all-cause mortality was consistent (aHR:1.18; 95%CI:1.12-1.24), regardless of the method used to define residence.

Conclusions: The method used to define residence in a population of adults newly treated with metformin for type 2 diabetes has minimal impact on measures of all-cause mortality, possibly due to infrequent migration. The observed association between residence and mortality is compelling but requires further investigation and more robust analysis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估加拿大行政数据中居住地的定义方法及其对观察到的2型糖尿病全因死亡率的影响。
目的:个人的居住地点可能影响健康,然而,卫生服务和结果研究通常使用单一时间点来确定个人居住的地点。当研究对象移动时,这种对居住地的估计会变得不准确,对观察到的关联的影响尚不清楚。本研究量化了不同的居住定义方法(农村、城市、大都市)对全因死亡率关联的影响。方法:从2008年至2019年加拿大艾伯塔省的行政数据中确定了一个糖尿病新二甲双胍使用者队列。使用4种不同的方法从邮政编码中定义个人的居住地(农村/城市/大都市):在首次使用二甲双胍前1年确定的居住地(作为参考模型),比较1-首次使用二甲双胍前3年的稳定居住地,比较2-随时间变化的居住地(在结果观察窗口期间),以及比较3 -嵌套病例对照(在确定病例和对照后最接近索引日期的居住地)。构建多变量Cox比例风险和逻辑回归模型来检验居住地定义与全因死亡率之间的关系。结果:我们确定了157,146名新的二甲双胍使用者(平均年龄55岁,57%为男性),在平均4.7年(SD 2.3)的随访期间发生了8,444例(5%)死亡。在第一次服用二甲双胍后,很少有搬家的例子;2.6%的人搬到较小的中心(大都市到城市或农村,或城市到农村),3.1%的人搬到较大的中心(农村到城市或大都市,或城市到大都市)。农村居住与全因死亡率之间的相关性是一致的(aHR:1.18;95%CI:1.12-1.24),无论使用何种方法定义居住地。结论:用于确定新接受二甲双胍治疗的2型糖尿病成人人群的居住地的方法对全因死亡率的测量影响很小,可能是由于不频繁的迁移。观察到的居住和死亡率之间的联系是令人信服的,但需要进一步的调查和更有力的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of studies falsely excluded during single-reviewer abstract screening: a meta-epidemiological analysis. Efficient median estimation for stratified multi-population data: health services, medical workforce, and medical education. Correction: VAS value set still has its own application value compare with TTO value set of EQ-5D-3L in Chinese population. DSPONVNet: a multimodal deep learning model integrating intraoperative monitoring and clinical features for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting risk. A computational framework and software tool for generating complex survival data with predefined censoring rates in simulation studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1