Racial Differences in Liver Fibrosis Burden.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s10620-025-08936-w
Michael L Attanasi, Mathew J Gregoski, Don C Rockey
{"title":"Racial Differences in Liver Fibrosis Burden.","authors":"Michael L Attanasi, Mathew J Gregoski, Don C Rockey","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-08936-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Liver histology is the classic method for staging the severity of liver fibrosis, which in turn is an important predictor of clinical outcome. Here, we have hypothesized that the susceptibility to develop fibrosis varies among racial groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the histology of all patients over 18 years of age who underwent liver biopsy at the Medical University of South Carolina from 1/1/2013 to 7/1/2021. Patients with malignancy, liver metastases, or missing data were excluded. Fibrosis was quantified using the Batts-Ludwig system (F0 = no fibrosis to F4 = histological cirrhosis). Racial groups were propensity matched based on age, gender, diabetes, alcohol consumption, and CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index Themes to mitigate the risk of selection bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1101 patients with liver biopsy histological fibrosis scores. The cohort included 23% Black patients. After propensity matching, Black patients were significantly more likely to have Hepatitis C (73/228 (32%) vs 45/228 (20%), p < 0.001) and autoimmune hepatitis (34/228 (15%) vs 6/228 (3%), p < 0.001) than White patients, while White patients were significantly more likely to have metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (71/228 (31%) vs 18/228 (8%), p < 0.001). White patients were significantly more likely to have cirrhosis than Black patients (White - 89/228 (39%) vs Black - 68/228 (30%), p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>White patients had a greater overall burden of advanced fibrosis (F4/cirrhosis) than Black patients, independent of etiology. The data suggest that fibrosis risk and/or progression may be worse in White than Black patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-08936-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: Liver histology is the classic method for staging the severity of liver fibrosis, which in turn is an important predictor of clinical outcome. Here, we have hypothesized that the susceptibility to develop fibrosis varies among racial groups.

Methods: We examined the histology of all patients over 18 years of age who underwent liver biopsy at the Medical University of South Carolina from 1/1/2013 to 7/1/2021. Patients with malignancy, liver metastases, or missing data were excluded. Fibrosis was quantified using the Batts-Ludwig system (F0 = no fibrosis to F4 = histological cirrhosis). Racial groups were propensity matched based on age, gender, diabetes, alcohol consumption, and CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index Themes to mitigate the risk of selection bias.

Results: We identified 1101 patients with liver biopsy histological fibrosis scores. The cohort included 23% Black patients. After propensity matching, Black patients were significantly more likely to have Hepatitis C (73/228 (32%) vs 45/228 (20%), p < 0.001) and autoimmune hepatitis (34/228 (15%) vs 6/228 (3%), p < 0.001) than White patients, while White patients were significantly more likely to have metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (71/228 (31%) vs 18/228 (8%), p < 0.001). White patients were significantly more likely to have cirrhosis than Black patients (White - 89/228 (39%) vs Black - 68/228 (30%), p < 0.05).

Conclusion: White patients had a greater overall burden of advanced fibrosis (F4/cirrhosis) than Black patients, independent of etiology. The data suggest that fibrosis risk and/or progression may be worse in White than Black patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
A Survey on Endoscopy-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries in Japanese Endoscopists Focused on Injury Sites and Risk Factors. Racial Differences in Liver Fibrosis Burden. Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab Dose Escalation in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Enhancing Methodological Rigor in AI-Driven Systematic Reviews: Addressing Key Limitations in Predicting TACE Outcomes. Gallbladder Preservation via NOTES Plus Dual Intracavitary Instruments: A New Minimally Invasive Paradigm (with Video).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1