Access to and Satisfaction with the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program: Differences Across Race, Ethnicity, Income, and Urbanicity among Missouri Residents.
Amanda Gilbert, Tyler Frank, Laura McDermott, Najjuwah Walden, Jason Jabbari, Stephen Roll, Dan Ferris
{"title":"Access to and Satisfaction with the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program: Differences Across Race, Ethnicity, Income, and Urbanicity among Missouri Residents.","authors":"Amanda Gilbert, Tyler Frank, Laura McDermott, Najjuwah Walden, Jason Jabbari, Stephen Roll, Dan Ferris","doi":"10.1177/03795721251323312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is a federal nutrition assistance program aiming to address food insecurity and improve health. Participation varies across marginalized groups (eg, Black, Hispanic, low-income, rural), likely due to WIC access barriers and satisfaction, limiting WIC's impact on health disparities.ObjectiveAssess WIC access and satisfaction across marginalized groups to understand determinants of WIC participation in Missouri, where food insecurity is high (11% overall, 12% Hispanic, 26% Black) and WIC participation low (41%).MethodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the Missouri WIC Experience Survey (April 2022-June 2022). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression assessed access (eg, clinic wait times, clinic hours, clinic location) and satisfaction (eg, nutrition education, meeting dietary needs, shopping experience) across race/ethnicity, income, and urbanicity.ResultsThe sample (<i>n</i> = 2232) consisted of 69% White, 16% Black, and 8% Hispanic WIC-eligible households. Most had monthly incomes of $4000 or less (69%) and 32% lived in rural areas. Black households had 75% higher odds of experiencing barriers compared to White households. Compared to urban households, rural households experienced 30% lower odds of being satisfied overall with WIC, but 75% higher odds of being satisfied with WIC meeting dietary needs. Hispanic households had 85% higher odds than White households of being satisfied with WIC.ConclusionsFindings offer considerations for addressing WIC access and satisfaction. WIC design and implementation should focus on barriers to access for Black households and improving overall satisfaction with WIC among rural and low-income households.</p>","PeriodicalId":12394,"journal":{"name":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"3795721251323312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721251323312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundThe Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is a federal nutrition assistance program aiming to address food insecurity and improve health. Participation varies across marginalized groups (eg, Black, Hispanic, low-income, rural), likely due to WIC access barriers and satisfaction, limiting WIC's impact on health disparities.ObjectiveAssess WIC access and satisfaction across marginalized groups to understand determinants of WIC participation in Missouri, where food insecurity is high (11% overall, 12% Hispanic, 26% Black) and WIC participation low (41%).MethodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the Missouri WIC Experience Survey (April 2022-June 2022). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression assessed access (eg, clinic wait times, clinic hours, clinic location) and satisfaction (eg, nutrition education, meeting dietary needs, shopping experience) across race/ethnicity, income, and urbanicity.ResultsThe sample (n = 2232) consisted of 69% White, 16% Black, and 8% Hispanic WIC-eligible households. Most had monthly incomes of $4000 or less (69%) and 32% lived in rural areas. Black households had 75% higher odds of experiencing barriers compared to White households. Compared to urban households, rural households experienced 30% lower odds of being satisfied overall with WIC, but 75% higher odds of being satisfied with WIC meeting dietary needs. Hispanic households had 85% higher odds than White households of being satisfied with WIC.ConclusionsFindings offer considerations for addressing WIC access and satisfaction. WIC design and implementation should focus on barriers to access for Black households and improving overall satisfaction with WIC among rural and low-income households.
期刊介绍:
The Food and Nutrition Bulletin (FNB,) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal published quarterly by the Nevin Scrimshaw International Nutrition Foundation. The Journal is one of the leading resources used by researchers, academics, nutrition policy makers and planners in over 125 countries to obtain the most current research and policy information related to nutrition in developing countries.