Insights into clinical practice: A national survey on fluid intake management in heart failure

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS ESC Heart Failure Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1002/ehf2.15273
Linn Höög, Anna Strömberg, Nana Waldréus, Carolin Nymark
{"title":"Insights into clinical practice: A national survey on fluid intake management in heart failure","authors":"Linn Höög,&nbsp;Anna Strömberg,&nbsp;Nana Waldréus,&nbsp;Carolin Nymark","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Due to insufficient evidence and a lack of cohesive guidelines, the management and use of fluid restriction in patients with heart failure (HF) may vary among healthcare professionals. However, the extent of this variation is unknown. The aim of this study was to describe physicians' and registered nurses' (RN) clinical practice regarding fluid intake and fluid restriction in adult patients with HF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>Physicians and RNs treating patients with HF at 75 hospitals across all healthcare regions in Sweden were invited to answer a web-based survey regarding management on fluid intake and fluid restriction. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics and chi-square test. A total of 646 physicians and RNs across 45 hospitals in Sweden completed the survey. Significant differences in recommendations and management were found in relation to professional role, care setting and work experience. Overall, 93.8% recommend fluid restriction for all or some patients with HF. RNs recommend fluid restriction for all patients with HF to a significantly higher extent compared with physicians (34.5% vs. 14.9%; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, 49.2% believe that fluid restriction is an effective treatment strategy to prevent congestion, and 29.3% recommend fluid restriction routinely. One-third lacked knowledge of existing local guidelines regarding fluid restriction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study shows that there are differences in clinical practice regarding healthcare professionals' recommendations on fluid intake and fluid restriction. These differences may result in patients with HF receiving varied and inconsistent care. Recommendations were primarily based on each healthcare professional's individual opinion rather than on evidence and guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":"12 4","pages":"2769-2779"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ehf2.15273","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.15273","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Due to insufficient evidence and a lack of cohesive guidelines, the management and use of fluid restriction in patients with heart failure (HF) may vary among healthcare professionals. However, the extent of this variation is unknown. The aim of this study was to describe physicians' and registered nurses' (RN) clinical practice regarding fluid intake and fluid restriction in adult patients with HF.

Methods and results

Physicians and RNs treating patients with HF at 75 hospitals across all healthcare regions in Sweden were invited to answer a web-based survey regarding management on fluid intake and fluid restriction. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics and chi-square test. A total of 646 physicians and RNs across 45 hospitals in Sweden completed the survey. Significant differences in recommendations and management were found in relation to professional role, care setting and work experience. Overall, 93.8% recommend fluid restriction for all or some patients with HF. RNs recommend fluid restriction for all patients with HF to a significantly higher extent compared with physicians (34.5% vs. 14.9%; P < 0.001). Additionally, 49.2% believe that fluid restriction is an effective treatment strategy to prevent congestion, and 29.3% recommend fluid restriction routinely. One-third lacked knowledge of existing local guidelines regarding fluid restriction.

Conclusions

This study shows that there are differences in clinical practice regarding healthcare professionals' recommendations on fluid intake and fluid restriction. These differences may result in patients with HF receiving varied and inconsistent care. Recommendations were primarily based on each healthcare professional's individual opinion rather than on evidence and guidelines.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对临床实践的见解:心力衰竭患者液体摄入管理的全国调查。
目的:由于证据不足和缺乏有凝聚力的指南,在心力衰竭(HF)患者中限制液体的管理和使用可能在医疗保健专业人员中有所不同。然而,这种变化的程度是未知的。本研究的目的是描述医生和注册护士(RN)关于成年心衰患者液体摄入和液体限制的临床实践。方法和结果:邀请瑞典所有医疗保健地区75家医院的HF患者的医生和注册护士回答一项关于液体摄入和液体限制管理的网络调查。资料分析采用描述性统计和卡方检验。瑞典45家医院的646名医生和注册护士完成了这项调查。不同职业角色、护理环境和工作经验在推荐和管理方面存在显著差异。总体而言,93.8%的人建议对所有或部分心衰患者限制液体摄入。注册护士推荐所有心衰患者限制液体的程度明显高于内科医生(34.5% vs 14.9%;结论:本研究表明,在临床实践中,医疗保健专业人员对液体摄入和液体限制的建议存在差异。这些差异可能导致心衰患者接受不同且不一致的治疗。建议主要基于每个医疗保健专业人员的个人意见,而不是基于证据和指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ESC Heart Failure
ESC Heart Failure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
461
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Prognosis of Tricuspid Regurgitation after Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: The EXPANDed Studies. Home-based body water monitoring and management system for heart failure patients using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Plasma Protein Profiles in Different Heart Failure Phenotypes. Worse Long-Term Outcomes in New-Onset HFpEF vs HFrEF and HFmrEF: Findings from the Stockholm PREFERS Study. Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of the dapagliflozin in hemodialysis (DAPA-HD) trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1