The influence of hemorrhagic shock on brain perfusion in a swine model of raised intracranial pressure.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s00068-025-02819-5
Hossam Abdou, Rebecca Treffalls, Grzegorz Jodlowski, Noha Elansary, Thomas Ptak, Patrick F Walker, Jonathan J Morrison
{"title":"The influence of hemorrhagic shock on brain perfusion in a swine model of raised intracranial pressure.","authors":"Hossam Abdou, Rebecca Treffalls, Grzegorz Jodlowski, Noha Elansary, Thomas Ptak, Patrick F Walker, Jonathan J Morrison","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02819-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In patients with hemorrhagic shock and an intracranial space occupying lesion (SOL), brain perfusion is severely compromised due to raised intracranial pressure (rICP), significantly worsening outcomes. This study aims to develop a swine model of a SOL with rICP and shock and characterize the effect on brain perfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten male swine were divided into two groups- normal ICP (nICP) and rICP. rICP animals had an intracranial Fogarty balloon catheter inserted, which was infused with saline to simulate a SOL. Animals underwent hemorrhage to systolic blood pressures (SBP) of 60, 40, and 20mmHg. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) were measured using CT perfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CBF/Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CBV/MAP curves were modeled using non-linear regression, with both groups demonstrating a sigmoid relation. In both the CBF/MAP and CBV/MAP curves, animals with rICP had loss of autoregulation at a higher MAP compared to nICP. The curves were an excellent fit for CBF (nICP R<sup>2</sup> = 0.95; rICP R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77) and CBV (nICP R<sup>2</sup> = 0.96; rICP R<sup>2</sup> = 0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study aids in quantifying the compounding insult of raised ICP and hemorrhage with regard to brain perfusion. Raised ICP results in autoregulatory failure at a higher MAP compared to animals with nICP. These results can help inform future studies that should be aimed at evaluating novel interventions for this complex clinical scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02819-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In patients with hemorrhagic shock and an intracranial space occupying lesion (SOL), brain perfusion is severely compromised due to raised intracranial pressure (rICP), significantly worsening outcomes. This study aims to develop a swine model of a SOL with rICP and shock and characterize the effect on brain perfusion.

Methods: Ten male swine were divided into two groups- normal ICP (nICP) and rICP. rICP animals had an intracranial Fogarty balloon catheter inserted, which was infused with saline to simulate a SOL. Animals underwent hemorrhage to systolic blood pressures (SBP) of 60, 40, and 20mmHg. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) were measured using CT perfusion.

Results: The CBF/Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CBV/MAP curves were modeled using non-linear regression, with both groups demonstrating a sigmoid relation. In both the CBF/MAP and CBV/MAP curves, animals with rICP had loss of autoregulation at a higher MAP compared to nICP. The curves were an excellent fit for CBF (nICP R2 = 0.95; rICP R2 = 0.77) and CBV (nICP R2 = 0.96; rICP R2 = 0.78).

Conclusions: This study aids in quantifying the compounding insult of raised ICP and hemorrhage with regard to brain perfusion. Raised ICP results in autoregulatory failure at a higher MAP compared to animals with nICP. These results can help inform future studies that should be aimed at evaluating novel interventions for this complex clinical scenario.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
出血性休克对颅内压升高猪模型脑灌注的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Combined apophyseal and epiphyseal fixation of Ogden type IIIA/IV tibial tubercle avulsion fractures provides favorable stability compared to isolated apophyseal screw fixation - a biomechanical study. Criteria for trauma team activation and staffing requirements for the management of patients with (suspected) multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room- a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update. Engineering the bone reconstruction surgery: the case of the masquelet-induced membrane technique. Operating room (OR) requirements. The influence of hemorrhagic shock on brain perfusion in a swine model of raised intracranial pressure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1