Cancer Patient Perspectives on Clinical Trial Discussion and Informed Consent Through Telemedicine.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1200/OP-24-00764
Yasin Khadem Charvadeh, Sahil D Doshi, Kenneth Seier, Erin M Bange, Bobby Daly, Allison Lipitz-Snyderman, Fernanda C G Polubriaginof, Michael Buckley, Gilad Kuperman, Peter D Stetson, Deb Schrag, Michael J Morris, Katherine S Panageas
{"title":"Cancer Patient Perspectives on Clinical Trial Discussion and Informed Consent Through Telemedicine.","authors":"Yasin Khadem Charvadeh, Sahil D Doshi, Kenneth Seier, Erin M Bange, Bobby Daly, Allison Lipitz-Snyderman, Fernanda C G Polubriaginof, Michael Buckley, Gilad Kuperman, Peter D Stetson, Deb Schrag, Michael J Morris, Katherine S Panageas","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Clinical trials are integral for patients with cancer but remain inaccessible to many because of barriers including geographic and transportation challenges. This study aimed to evaluate cancer patients' preferences for telemedicine versus in-person visits for clinical trial discussions and informed consent (IC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey was administered to first-time telemedicine users at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2021 to 2023. The survey assessed patients' preferences for telemedicine versus in-person visits for the IC process and their comfort with discussing clinical trials virtually. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who indicated that they preferred a telemedicine visit for the IC process. Patient comfort and preference for discussing clinical trials through telemedicine versus an in-person visit was also explored. Structured responses provided quantitative data over the 2021-2023 observation period and demographic variations. To gain a more detailed understanding, unstructured free-text responses describing clinical trial discussions were also analyzed through language modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 57% of patients (540/955) preferred telemedicine, 26% (249/955) had no preference, and 17% (166/955) preferred in-person visits for the IC process. The preference for telemedicine remained consistent across the 2021-2023 observation period. Most patients reported no difference between a telemedicine versus in-person visit for clinical trial discussion, including asking questions, sharing concerns, declining participation, and asking for more time to make a decision. Language modeling analysis revealed areas for improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A majority of patients at a comprehensive cancer center who participated in clinical trial discussions through telemedicine reported a preference for telemedicine to complete the IC process. Telemedicine thus represents a valuable tool for reducing barriers to clinical trial participation, particularly in reducing travel and time barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"1439-1446"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353420/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00764","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical trials are integral for patients with cancer but remain inaccessible to many because of barriers including geographic and transportation challenges. This study aimed to evaluate cancer patients' preferences for telemedicine versus in-person visits for clinical trial discussions and informed consent (IC).

Methods: An electronic survey was administered to first-time telemedicine users at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2021 to 2023. The survey assessed patients' preferences for telemedicine versus in-person visits for the IC process and their comfort with discussing clinical trials virtually. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who indicated that they preferred a telemedicine visit for the IC process. Patient comfort and preference for discussing clinical trials through telemedicine versus an in-person visit was also explored. Structured responses provided quantitative data over the 2021-2023 observation period and demographic variations. To gain a more detailed understanding, unstructured free-text responses describing clinical trial discussions were also analyzed through language modeling.

Results: Overall, 57% of patients (540/955) preferred telemedicine, 26% (249/955) had no preference, and 17% (166/955) preferred in-person visits for the IC process. The preference for telemedicine remained consistent across the 2021-2023 observation period. Most patients reported no difference between a telemedicine versus in-person visit for clinical trial discussion, including asking questions, sharing concerns, declining participation, and asking for more time to make a decision. Language modeling analysis revealed areas for improvement.

Conclusion: A majority of patients at a comprehensive cancer center who participated in clinical trial discussions through telemedicine reported a preference for telemedicine to complete the IC process. Telemedicine thus represents a valuable tool for reducing barriers to clinical trial participation, particularly in reducing travel and time barriers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程医疗中癌症患者对临床试验讨论和知情同意的看法。
目的:临床试验是癌症患者不可或缺的一部分,但由于地理和交通方面的障碍,许多人仍然无法进入临床试验。本研究旨在评估癌症患者在临床试验讨论和知情同意(IC)时对远程医疗和亲自就诊的偏好。方法:对纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心2021年至2023年首次远程医疗用户进行电子调查。该调查评估了患者对远程医疗的偏好,以及他们对虚拟讨论临床试验的舒适度。主要结果是表示他们更喜欢远程医疗访问IC过程的患者比例。还探讨了患者通过远程医疗与亲自就诊讨论临床试验的舒适度和偏好。结构化回答提供了2021-2023年观察期和人口变化的定量数据。为了获得更详细的理解,描述临床试验讨论的非结构化自由文本回复也通过语言建模进行了分析。结果:总体而言,57%(540/955)的患者倾向于远程医疗,26%(249/955)的患者没有偏好,17%(166/955)的患者倾向于亲自就诊。在2021-2023年的观察期内,对远程医疗的偏好保持一致。大多数患者报告说,远程医疗与面对面的临床试验讨论没有区别,包括提出问题、分享担忧、拒绝参与和要求更多时间做出决定。语言建模分析揭示了需要改进的地方。结论:综合癌症中心通过远程医疗参与临床试验讨论的大多数患者报告倾向于远程医疗来完成IC过程。因此,远程医疗是减少临床试验参与障碍的宝贵工具,特别是在减少旅行和时间障碍方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Prognosis and Hope Among Patients With Advanced Cancer at the Time of Enrollment in an Early-Phase Clinical Trial. Barriers, Facilitators, and Attitudes Toward Telemedicine Adoption in Oncology: A Qualitative Study of Patients From Low-Broadband Areas. Economic Evaluation of GARDE: A Digital Health Platform for Population-Level Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment. Economics of Translating Research Into Practice: The Case of Exercise to Prevent Cancer Recurrence. 20 Years of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology: Reflections and Aspirations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1