Reliability of Average Daily Steps Measured Through a Consumer Smartwatch in Parkinson Disease Phenotypes, Stages, and Severities: Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Formative Research Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.2196/63153
Edoardo Bianchini, Domiziana Rinaldi, Lanfranco De Carolis, Silvia Galli, Marika Alborghetti, Clint Hansen, Antonio Suppa, Marco Salvetti, Francesco Ernesto Pontieri, Nicolas Vuillerme
{"title":"Reliability of Average Daily Steps Measured Through a Consumer Smartwatch in Parkinson Disease Phenotypes, Stages, and Severities: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Edoardo Bianchini, Domiziana Rinaldi, Lanfranco De Carolis, Silvia Galli, Marika Alborghetti, Clint Hansen, Antonio Suppa, Marco Salvetti, Francesco Ernesto Pontieri, Nicolas Vuillerme","doi":"10.2196/63153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Average daily steps (avDS) could be a valuable indicator of real-world ambulation in people with Parkinson disease (PD), and previous studies have reported the validity and reliability of this measure. Nonetheless, no study has considered disease phenotype, stage, and severity when assessing the reliability of consumer wrist-worn devices to estimate daily step count in unsupervised, free-living conditions in PD.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess and compare the reliability of a consumer wrist-worn smartwatch (Garmin Vivosmart 4) in counting avDS in people with PD in unsupervised, free-living conditions among disease phenotypes, stages, and severity groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 104 people with PD were monitored through Garmin Vivosmart 4 for 5 consecutive days. Total daily steps were recorded and avDS were calculated. Participants were dichotomized into tremor dominant (TD; n=39) or postural instability and gait disorder (PIGD; n=65), presence (n=57) or absence (n=47) of tremor, and mild (n=65) or moderate (n=39) disease severity. Based on the modified Hoehn and Yahr scale (mHY), participants were further dichotomized into earlier (mHY 1-2; n=68) or intermediate (mHY 2.5-3; n=36) disease stages. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; 3,k), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC) were used to evaluate the reliability of avDS for each subgroup. The threshold for acceptability was set at an ICC ≥0.8 with a lower bound of 95% CI ≥0.75. The 2-tailed Student t tests for independent groups and analysis of 83.4% CI overlap were used to compare ICC between each group pair.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reliability of avDS measured through Garmin Vivosmart 4 for 5 consecutive days in unsupervised, free-living conditions was acceptable in the overall population with an ICC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.92), SEM below 10%, and an MDC of 1580 steps per day (27% of criterion). In all investigated subgroups, the reliability of avDS was also acceptable (ICC range 0.84-0.94). However, ICCs were significantly lower in participants with tremor (P=.03), with mild severity (P=.04), and earlier stage (P=.003). Moreover, SEM was below 10% in participants with PIGD phenotype, without tremor, moderate disease severity, and intermediate disease stage, with an MDC ranging from 1148 to 1687 steps per day (18%-25% of criterion). Conversely, in participants with TD phenotype, tremor, mild disease severity, and earlier disease stage, SEM was >10% of the criterion and MDC values ranged from 1401 to 2263 steps per day (30%-33% of the criterion).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In mild-to-moderate PD, avDS measured through a consumer smartwatch in unsupervised, free-living conditions for 5 consecutive days are reliable irrespective of disease phenotype, stage, and severity. However, in individuals with TD phenotype, tremor, mild disease severity, and earlier disease stages, reliability could be lower. These findings could facilitate a broader and informed implementation of avDS as an index of ambulatory activity in PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e63153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Average daily steps (avDS) could be a valuable indicator of real-world ambulation in people with Parkinson disease (PD), and previous studies have reported the validity and reliability of this measure. Nonetheless, no study has considered disease phenotype, stage, and severity when assessing the reliability of consumer wrist-worn devices to estimate daily step count in unsupervised, free-living conditions in PD.

Objective: This study aims to assess and compare the reliability of a consumer wrist-worn smartwatch (Garmin Vivosmart 4) in counting avDS in people with PD in unsupervised, free-living conditions among disease phenotypes, stages, and severity groups.

Methods: A total of 104 people with PD were monitored through Garmin Vivosmart 4 for 5 consecutive days. Total daily steps were recorded and avDS were calculated. Participants were dichotomized into tremor dominant (TD; n=39) or postural instability and gait disorder (PIGD; n=65), presence (n=57) or absence (n=47) of tremor, and mild (n=65) or moderate (n=39) disease severity. Based on the modified Hoehn and Yahr scale (mHY), participants were further dichotomized into earlier (mHY 1-2; n=68) or intermediate (mHY 2.5-3; n=36) disease stages. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; 3,k), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC) were used to evaluate the reliability of avDS for each subgroup. The threshold for acceptability was set at an ICC ≥0.8 with a lower bound of 95% CI ≥0.75. The 2-tailed Student t tests for independent groups and analysis of 83.4% CI overlap were used to compare ICC between each group pair.

Results: Reliability of avDS measured through Garmin Vivosmart 4 for 5 consecutive days in unsupervised, free-living conditions was acceptable in the overall population with an ICC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.92), SEM below 10%, and an MDC of 1580 steps per day (27% of criterion). In all investigated subgroups, the reliability of avDS was also acceptable (ICC range 0.84-0.94). However, ICCs were significantly lower in participants with tremor (P=.03), with mild severity (P=.04), and earlier stage (P=.003). Moreover, SEM was below 10% in participants with PIGD phenotype, without tremor, moderate disease severity, and intermediate disease stage, with an MDC ranging from 1148 to 1687 steps per day (18%-25% of criterion). Conversely, in participants with TD phenotype, tremor, mild disease severity, and earlier disease stage, SEM was >10% of the criterion and MDC values ranged from 1401 to 2263 steps per day (30%-33% of the criterion).

Conclusions: In mild-to-moderate PD, avDS measured through a consumer smartwatch in unsupervised, free-living conditions for 5 consecutive days are reliable irrespective of disease phenotype, stage, and severity. However, in individuals with TD phenotype, tremor, mild disease severity, and earlier disease stages, reliability could be lower. These findings could facilitate a broader and informed implementation of avDS as an index of ambulatory activity in PD.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过消费者智能手表测量帕金森病表型、分期和严重程度的平均每日步数的可靠性:横断面研究
背景:平均每日步数(avDS)可能是帕金森病(PD)患者真实世界行走的一个有价值的指标,以前的研究已经报道了这一测量的有效性和可靠性。然而,在评估消费者腕带设备在无监督、自由生活条件下估计PD患者每日步数的可靠性时,没有研究考虑疾病表型、阶段和严重程度。目的:本研究旨在评估和比较消费者腕带智能手表(Garmin Vivosmart 4)在无监督、自由生活条件下,在疾病表型、阶段和严重程度组中计算PD患者avDS的可靠性。方法:采用Garmin Vivosmart 4连续5天监测104例PD患者。记录每日总步数并计算avDS。参与者被分为震颤显性组(TD);n=39)或姿势不稳定和步态障碍(PIGD;N =65),存在(N =57)或不存在(N =47)震颤,以及轻度(N =65)或中度(N =39)疾病严重程度。根据改进的Hoehn and Yahr量表(mHY),将被试进一步分为早期(mHY 1-2;n=68)或中级(mHY 2.5-3;N =36)疾病分期。类内相关系数;3,k),测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC)用于评估avDS在每个亚组的可靠性。可接受的阈值设定为ICC≥0.8,下限为95% CI≥0.75。采用独立组的双尾Student t检验和83.4% CI重叠分析比较各组间的ICC。结果:在无监督的自由生活条件下,通过Garmin Vivosmart 4连续5天测量的avDS的可靠性在总体人群中是可以接受的,ICC为0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.92), SEM低于10%,MDC为每天1580步(标准的27%)。在所有调查的亚组中,avDS的可靠性也可以接受(ICC范围0.84-0.94)。然而,患有震颤(P=.03)、轻度严重(P=.04)和早期(P=.003)的参与者的ICCs显著降低。此外,在PIGD表型、无震颤、疾病严重程度中等、疾病分期中等的参与者中,SEM低于10%,MDC范围为每天1148至1687步(标准的18%-25%)。相反,在TD表型、震颤、轻度疾病严重程度和早期疾病阶段的参与者中,SEM为标准的100 - 10%,MDC值为每天1401至2263步(标准的30%-33%)。结论:在轻中度PD中,通过消费者智能手表在无监督、自由生活条件下连续5天测量的avDS是可靠的,无论疾病表型、阶段和严重程度如何。然而,对于TD表型、震颤、轻度疾病严重程度和早期疾病阶段的个体,可靠性可能较低。这些发现可以促进avDS作为PD患者动态活动指标的更广泛和明智的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge graphs based on meta-analysis papers improve the quality of case formulation: a mixed methods design. Exploring Feature Priorities and User Needs in Developing Virtual Study Assistants. Health-Related Quality of Life Before and After Sobriety in Combination With an Adjunctive Journaling App in Patients With Alcohol-Related Liver Disease: Prospective Single-Arm Study. Automated Annotation of Pain Chronicity in Patients With Back Pain by Using Electronic Health Records: Retrospective Study. Cross-Cultural Differences in Public Discourse on COVID-19 Vaccination in the United States and South Korea: Cross-Sectional Analysis Using Natural Language Processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1