Jonas Ver Berne, Soroush Baseri Saadi, Nicolly Oliveira Santos, Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Reinhilde Jacobs
{"title":"Automated classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions using a CNN-LSTM architecture.","authors":"Jonas Ver Berne, Soroush Baseri Saadi, Nicolly Oliveira Santos, Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Reinhilde Jacobs","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Considering Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network approaches have shown promising image classification performance, the aim of this study was to compare the performance of novel Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) architectures with a classic CNN for classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset of 356 panoramic radiographs with periapical lesions and 769 control images were retrospectively collected and divided into training, validation, and testing sets. Next, four different models were constructed: a classic CNN, a classic LSTM, a cascaded CNN-LSTM, and parallel CNN-LSTM architecture. In each model the CNN took the full panoramic radiograph as input while the LSTM network ran on the images divided into 6 sequential patches. Sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Receiver-Operating Curve (AUC) were calculated. McNemar's test compared the sensitivity and specificity between the classic CNN and the other models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parallel CNN-LSTM had a significantly higher sensitivity than classic CNN for detecting periapical lesions (95% vs. 81%, 95% confidence interval for the difference = 6 - 22 %, P = 0.002), while also exhibiting the best overall performance of the four models [AUC = 96% vs. 90% (classic CNN), 92% (classic LSTM), and 94% (cascaded CNN-LSTM)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The parallel CNN-LSTM architecture outperformed the classic CNN for classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Combining CNN and LSTM models improves the classification of panoramic radiographs with and without inflammatory periapical lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"105688"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Considering Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network approaches have shown promising image classification performance, the aim of this study was to compare the performance of novel Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) architectures with a classic CNN for classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions.
Methods: A dataset of 356 panoramic radiographs with periapical lesions and 769 control images were retrospectively collected and divided into training, validation, and testing sets. Next, four different models were constructed: a classic CNN, a classic LSTM, a cascaded CNN-LSTM, and parallel CNN-LSTM architecture. In each model the CNN took the full panoramic radiograph as input while the LSTM network ran on the images divided into 6 sequential patches. Sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Receiver-Operating Curve (AUC) were calculated. McNemar's test compared the sensitivity and specificity between the classic CNN and the other models.
Results: Parallel CNN-LSTM had a significantly higher sensitivity than classic CNN for detecting periapical lesions (95% vs. 81%, 95% confidence interval for the difference = 6 - 22 %, P = 0.002), while also exhibiting the best overall performance of the four models [AUC = 96% vs. 90% (classic CNN), 92% (classic LSTM), and 94% (cascaded CNN-LSTM)].
Conclusions: The parallel CNN-LSTM architecture outperformed the classic CNN for classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions.
Clinical significance: Combining CNN and LSTM models improves the classification of panoramic radiographs with and without inflammatory periapical lesions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis.
Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research.
The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.