Automated classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions using a CNN-LSTM architecture

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105688
Jonas Ver Berne , Soroush Baseri Saadi , Nicolly Oliveira-Santos , Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira , Reinhilde Jacobs
{"title":"Automated classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions using a CNN-LSTM architecture","authors":"Jonas Ver Berne ,&nbsp;Soroush Baseri Saadi ,&nbsp;Nicolly Oliveira-Santos ,&nbsp;Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira ,&nbsp;Reinhilde Jacobs","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Considering Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network approaches have shown promising image classification performance, the aim of this study was to compare the performance of novel Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) architectures with a classic CNN for classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A dataset of 356 panoramic radiographs with periapical lesions and 769 control images were retrospectively collected and divided into training, validation, and testing sets. Next, four different models were constructed: a classic CNN, a classic LSTM, a cascaded CNN-LSTM, and parallel CNN-LSTM architecture. In each model the CNN took the full panoramic radiograph as input while the LSTM network ran on the images divided into 6 sequential patches. Sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Receiver-Operating Curve (AUC) were calculated. McNemar's test compared the sensitivity and specificity between the classic CNN and the other models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Parallel CNN-LSTM had a significantly higher sensitivity than classic CNN for detecting periapical lesions (95% vs. 81%, 95% confidence interval for the difference = 6 – 22 %, P = 0.002), while also exhibiting the best overall performance of the four models [AUC = 96% vs. 90% (classic CNN), 92% (classic LSTM), and 94% (cascaded CNN-LSTM)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The parallel CNN-LSTM architecture outperformed the classic CNN for classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>Combining CNN and LSTM models improves the classification of panoramic radiographs with and without inflammatory periapical lesions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 105688"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225001332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Considering Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network approaches have shown promising image classification performance, the aim of this study was to compare the performance of novel Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) architectures with a classic CNN for classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions.

Methods

A dataset of 356 panoramic radiographs with periapical lesions and 769 control images were retrospectively collected and divided into training, validation, and testing sets. Next, four different models were constructed: a classic CNN, a classic LSTM, a cascaded CNN-LSTM, and parallel CNN-LSTM architecture. In each model the CNN took the full panoramic radiograph as input while the LSTM network ran on the images divided into 6 sequential patches. Sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Receiver-Operating Curve (AUC) were calculated. McNemar's test compared the sensitivity and specificity between the classic CNN and the other models.

Results

Parallel CNN-LSTM had a significantly higher sensitivity than classic CNN for detecting periapical lesions (95% vs. 81%, 95% confidence interval for the difference = 6 – 22 %, P = 0.002), while also exhibiting the best overall performance of the four models [AUC = 96% vs. 90% (classic CNN), 92% (classic LSTM), and 94% (cascaded CNN-LSTM)].

Conclusions

The parallel CNN-LSTM architecture outperformed the classic CNN for classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions.

Clinical significance

Combining CNN and LSTM models improves the classification of panoramic radiographs with and without inflammatory periapical lesions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用CNN-LSTM架构对带有炎症性根尖周围病变的全景x线片进行自动分类。
考虑到卷积神经网络(CNN)和长短期记忆(LSTM)网络方法已经显示出很好的图像分类性能,本研究的目的是比较新型卷积神经网络和长短期记忆(CNN-LSTM)架构与经典CNN在炎症性根尖周围病变全景x线片分类中的性能。方法:回顾性收集356张根尖周围病变全景x线片和769张对照片,分为训练组、验证组和测试组。接下来,构建了四种不同的模型:经典CNN、经典LSTM、级联CNN-LSTM和并行CNN-LSTM架构。在每个模型中,CNN都以全景x线照片作为输入,而LSTM网络则对分成6个顺序patch的图像进行运行。计算灵敏度、特异度和受体工作曲线下面积(AUC)。McNemar的测试比较了经典CNN和其他模型的敏感性和特异性。结果:平行CNN-LSTM检测根尖周病变的灵敏度明显高于经典CNN (95% vs 81%,差异的95%可信区间 = 6 - 22%,P = 0.002),同时也表现出四种模型的最佳综合性能[AUC = 96% vs. 90%(经典CNN), 92%(经典LSTM)和94%(级联CNN-LSTM)]。结论:平行CNN- lstm架构在诊断炎症性根尖周病变的全景x线片上优于经典CNN。临床意义:CNN与LSTM模型的结合改进了有无炎症性根尖周病变全景片的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the accuracy and effectiveness of two robotic surgical techniques for zygomatic implant placement: an in vitro study Performance and repeatability of different models of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) in generating removable partial denture framework designs. A comparative study Navigation implant surgery accuracy in different types of edentulism: A systematic review and meta-analysis Evaluation of surface and positional trueness of removable dies fabricated through fused filament fabrication Facial surface tracing approach to reduce the observation errors in 3D curvilinear landmark annotations on cone-beam computed tomography images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1