Automated classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions using a CNN-LSTM architecture.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105688
Jonas Ver Berne, Soroush Baseri Saadi, Nicolly Oliveira Santos, Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Reinhilde Jacobs
{"title":"Automated classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions using a CNN-LSTM architecture.","authors":"Jonas Ver Berne, Soroush Baseri Saadi, Nicolly Oliveira Santos, Luiz Eduardo Marinho-Vieira, Reinhilde Jacobs","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Considering Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network approaches have shown promising image classification performance, the aim of this study was to compare the performance of novel Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) architectures with a classic CNN for classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset of 356 panoramic radiographs with periapical lesions and 769 control images were retrospectively collected and divided into training, validation, and testing sets. Next, four different models were constructed: a classic CNN, a classic LSTM, a cascaded CNN-LSTM, and parallel CNN-LSTM architecture. In each model the CNN took the full panoramic radiograph as input while the LSTM network ran on the images divided into 6 sequential patches. Sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Receiver-Operating Curve (AUC) were calculated. McNemar's test compared the sensitivity and specificity between the classic CNN and the other models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parallel CNN-LSTM had a significantly higher sensitivity than classic CNN for detecting periapical lesions (95% vs. 81%, 95% confidence interval for the difference = 6 - 22 %, P = 0.002), while also exhibiting the best overall performance of the four models [AUC = 96% vs. 90% (classic CNN), 92% (classic LSTM), and 94% (cascaded CNN-LSTM)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The parallel CNN-LSTM architecture outperformed the classic CNN for classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Combining CNN and LSTM models improves the classification of panoramic radiographs with and without inflammatory periapical lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"105688"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Considering Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network approaches have shown promising image classification performance, the aim of this study was to compare the performance of novel Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) architectures with a classic CNN for classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions.

Methods: A dataset of 356 panoramic radiographs with periapical lesions and 769 control images were retrospectively collected and divided into training, validation, and testing sets. Next, four different models were constructed: a classic CNN, a classic LSTM, a cascaded CNN-LSTM, and parallel CNN-LSTM architecture. In each model the CNN took the full panoramic radiograph as input while the LSTM network ran on the images divided into 6 sequential patches. Sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Receiver-Operating Curve (AUC) were calculated. McNemar's test compared the sensitivity and specificity between the classic CNN and the other models.

Results: Parallel CNN-LSTM had a significantly higher sensitivity than classic CNN for detecting periapical lesions (95% vs. 81%, 95% confidence interval for the difference = 6 - 22 %, P = 0.002), while also exhibiting the best overall performance of the four models [AUC = 96% vs. 90% (classic CNN), 92% (classic LSTM), and 94% (cascaded CNN-LSTM)].

Conclusions: The parallel CNN-LSTM architecture outperformed the classic CNN for classification of panoramic radiographs with inflammatory periapical lesions.

Clinical significance: Combining CNN and LSTM models improves the classification of panoramic radiographs with and without inflammatory periapical lesions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence models for periodontitis classification: A systematic review. Direct Restorations Versus Full Crowns in Endodontically Treated Molar Teeth: A Three-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. Prognostic factors and prognostic models for white spot lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized clinical split-mouth study on a self-adhesive vs. a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities: Results after five years. The role of hydroxyapatite-based, fluoride-free toothpastes on the prevention and the remineralization of initial caries lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1