Prognostic factors and prognostic models for white spot lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105686
Wei Lu , Nannan Wang , Xiaolin Fang , Hongye Yang , Hong He , Danchen Qin , Fang Hua
{"title":"Prognostic factors and prognostic models for white spot lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Wei Lu ,&nbsp;Nannan Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaolin Fang ,&nbsp;Hongye Yang ,&nbsp;Hong He ,&nbsp;Danchen Qin ,&nbsp;Fang Hua","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To summarize the existing evidence on prognostic factors (PFs) and prognostic models (PMs) for white spot lesions (WSLs) in orthodontic patients.</div></div><div><h3>Sources</h3><div>Electronic searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus (last search date: December 19th, 2024), supplemented by grey sources (Google Scholar and ProQuest). Manual searches were performed by checking the reference lists of key relevant publications.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection</h3><div>Cohort and case-control studies reporting PFs and PMs for WSLs in orthodontic patients were included. The risk of bias was assessed with QUIPS and PROBAST tools for PF and PM studies, respectively. Prognostic estimates were pooled with risk ratio (RR) using the random effects model. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with an adapted GRADE system.</div></div><div><h3>Data</h3><div>Thirty-two PF and one PM studies were included, involving 5101 participants and investigating 31 PFs and 1 PM. Pretreatment lesions [RR=3.87 (95 % CI, 2.06 to 7.27)] and pretreatment oral hygiene condition [RR=1.86 (95 % CI 1.20 to 2.88)] were significant PFs for WSL incidence, whereas there is insufficient evidence for gender and treatment duration. Only 1 PM was identified, which was developed via Fisher's discriminatory analysis without adjustment and validation. The certainty of evidence was rated as very low or low.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions/Clinical Significance</h3><div>Based on low and very low certainty evidence, the existing lesions and oral hygiene condition before the commencement of orthodontic treatment are significant PFs for WSL incidence. Comprehensive pretreatment assessments are vital for preventing WSLs in orthodontic patients. The development of a novel, validated PM for WSL risk assessment is warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 105686"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225001319","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To summarize the existing evidence on prognostic factors (PFs) and prognostic models (PMs) for white spot lesions (WSLs) in orthodontic patients.

Sources

Electronic searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus (last search date: December 19th, 2024), supplemented by grey sources (Google Scholar and ProQuest). Manual searches were performed by checking the reference lists of key relevant publications.

Study selection

Cohort and case-control studies reporting PFs and PMs for WSLs in orthodontic patients were included. The risk of bias was assessed with QUIPS and PROBAST tools for PF and PM studies, respectively. Prognostic estimates were pooled with risk ratio (RR) using the random effects model. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with an adapted GRADE system.

Data

Thirty-two PF and one PM studies were included, involving 5101 participants and investigating 31 PFs and 1 PM. Pretreatment lesions [RR=3.87 (95 % CI, 2.06 to 7.27)] and pretreatment oral hygiene condition [RR=1.86 (95 % CI 1.20 to 2.88)] were significant PFs for WSL incidence, whereas there is insufficient evidence for gender and treatment duration. Only 1 PM was identified, which was developed via Fisher's discriminatory analysis without adjustment and validation. The certainty of evidence was rated as very low or low.

Conclusions/Clinical Significance

Based on low and very low certainty evidence, the existing lesions and oral hygiene condition before the commencement of orthodontic treatment are significant PFs for WSL incidence. Comprehensive pretreatment assessments are vital for preventing WSLs in orthodontic patients. The development of a novel, validated PM for WSL risk assessment is warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白斑病变的预后因素和预后模型:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:总结正畸患者白斑病变预后因素及预后模型的研究进展。来源:通过PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Scopus进行电子检索(最后检索日期:2024年12月19日),并辅以灰色来源(b谷歌Scholar和ProQuest)。人工检索是通过检查关键相关出版物的参考书目进行的。研究选择:纳入报告正畸患者WSLs的PFs和PMs的队列和病例对照研究。分别使用QUIPS和PROBAST工具对PF和PM研究进行偏倚风险评估。使用随机效应模型将预后估计值与风险比(RR)合并。证据的确定性用一个改进的GRADE系统进行评估。数据:纳入32项PF和1项PM研究,涉及5101名参与者,调查31名PF和1名PM。预处理病变[RR=3.87 (95% CI, 2.06 ~ 7.27)]和预处理口腔卫生状况[RR=1.86 (95% CI 1.20 ~ 2.88)]是WSL发病率的显著PFs,而性别和治疗时间的相关证据不足。只有一个PM被确定,它是通过Fisher的歧视分析开发的,没有调整和验证。证据的确定性被评为非常低或低。结论/临床意义:基于低确定性和极低确定性证据,正畸治疗开始前的现有病变和口腔卫生状况是WSL发生的显著因素。全面的预处理评估对于预防正畸患者的wsl至关重要。为WSL风险评估开发一种新的、经过验证的PM是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of dentistry
Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
349
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
A deep learning method for diagnosis of oral potentially malignant disorders. The health impacts of dental amalgam and alternative restorative materials: a systematic review. Fluoride varnish for preventing dental caries among children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness studies. Novel F-ACP@CMC/LYZ gel for cementum remineralization and reducing resin restoration microleakage. Peri-implant health and patient-reported outcomes in mandibular two-locator overdentures: A 1- to 9-year retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1