{"title":"Prognostic factors and prognostic models for white spot lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Wei Lu, Nannan Wang, Xiaolin Fang, Hongye Yang, Hong He, Danchen Qin, Fang Hua","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarize the existing evidence on prognostic factors (PFs) and prognostic models (PMs) for white spot lesions (WSLs) in orthodontic patients.</p><p><strong>Sources: </strong>Electronic searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus (last search date: December 19th, 2024), supplemented by grey sources (Google Scholar and ProQuest). Manual searches were performed by checking the reference lists of key relevant publications.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Cohort and case-control studies reporting PFs and PMs for WSLs in orthodontic patients were included. The risk of bias was assessed with QUIPS and PROBAST tools for PF and PM studies, respectively. Prognostic estimates were pooled with risk ratio (RR) using the random effects model. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with an adapted GRADE system.</p><p><strong>Data: </strong>Thirty-two PF and one PM studies were included, involving 5101 participants and investigating 31 PFs and 1 PM. Pretreatment lesions [RR=3.87 (95% CI, 2.06 to 7.27)] and pretreatment oral hygiene condition [RR=1.86 (95% CI 1.20 to 2.88)] were significant PFs for WSL incidence, whereas there is insufficient evidence for gender and treatment duration. Only one PM was identified, which was developed via Fisher's discriminatory analysis without adjustment and validation. The certainty of evidence was rated as very low or low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/clinical significance: </strong>Based on low and very low certainty evidence, the existing lesions and oral hygiene condition before the commencement of orthodontic treatment are significant PFs for WSL incidence. Comprehensive pretreatment assessments are vital for preventing WSLs in orthodontic patients. The development of a novel, validated PM for WSL risk assessment is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"105686"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To summarize the existing evidence on prognostic factors (PFs) and prognostic models (PMs) for white spot lesions (WSLs) in orthodontic patients.
Sources: Electronic searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus (last search date: December 19th, 2024), supplemented by grey sources (Google Scholar and ProQuest). Manual searches were performed by checking the reference lists of key relevant publications.
Study selection: Cohort and case-control studies reporting PFs and PMs for WSLs in orthodontic patients were included. The risk of bias was assessed with QUIPS and PROBAST tools for PF and PM studies, respectively. Prognostic estimates were pooled with risk ratio (RR) using the random effects model. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with an adapted GRADE system.
Data: Thirty-two PF and one PM studies were included, involving 5101 participants and investigating 31 PFs and 1 PM. Pretreatment lesions [RR=3.87 (95% CI, 2.06 to 7.27)] and pretreatment oral hygiene condition [RR=1.86 (95% CI 1.20 to 2.88)] were significant PFs for WSL incidence, whereas there is insufficient evidence for gender and treatment duration. Only one PM was identified, which was developed via Fisher's discriminatory analysis without adjustment and validation. The certainty of evidence was rated as very low or low.
Conclusions/clinical significance: Based on low and very low certainty evidence, the existing lesions and oral hygiene condition before the commencement of orthodontic treatment are significant PFs for WSL incidence. Comprehensive pretreatment assessments are vital for preventing WSLs in orthodontic patients. The development of a novel, validated PM for WSL risk assessment is warranted.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis.
Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research.
The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.