Differences in conduction velocities of nerve fibers excited by infrared and electrical stimulation.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Neuroscience Methods Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110427
Louis Vande Perre, Javier Chávez Cerda, Soizic Gochard, Maxime Verstraeten, Romain Raffoul, Catherine Leonard, Jean Delbeke, Riëm El Tahry, Simon-Pierre Gorza, Antoine Nonclercq
{"title":"Differences in conduction velocities of nerve fibers excited by infrared and electrical stimulation.","authors":"Louis Vande Perre, Javier Chávez Cerda, Soizic Gochard, Maxime Verstraeten, Romain Raffoul, Catherine Leonard, Jean Delbeke, Riëm El Tahry, Simon-Pierre Gorza, Antoine Nonclercq","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infrared neural stimulation (INS) uses short optical pulses to activate nerves. While electrical stimulation (ES) activates large-diameter fibers first, light may preferentially activate small-diameter fibers first, which could be valuable for many clinical applications.</p><p><strong>New method: </strong>This study used a compact diode laser of 1470 nm to perform INS. Conduction velocity (CV) measurements were performed to assess differences in fiber type activation between INS and ES in the rat sciatic nerve and the goat vagus nerve. The rat sciatic nerve was chosen as a standard model because of its well-characterized physiology and extensive use in studies of INS mechanisms. The goat vagus nerve was chosen because of its expected high proportion of small-diameter fibers and its larger size, which allows sufficient separation between recording units to optimize CNAP measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that in the rat sciatic nerve, ES-excited fibers had significantly higher CVs (9.81 ± 3.18 m/s) than INS-excited fibers (8.10 ± 2.82 m/s). In the goat vagus nerve, ES produced a mean CV of 6.47 ± 1.25 m/s, but INS did not produce clearly distinguishable compound nerve action potential, highlighting the challenges of applying INS to larger nerves.</p><p><strong>Comparison to existing methods: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, CV is, for the first time, measured to identify the type of nerve fiber excited by INS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that INS may preferentially activate smaller diameter fibers, providing insight for potential neuromodulation applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":" ","pages":"110427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infrared neural stimulation (INS) uses short optical pulses to activate nerves. While electrical stimulation (ES) activates large-diameter fibers first, light may preferentially activate small-diameter fibers first, which could be valuable for many clinical applications.

New method: This study used a compact diode laser of 1470 nm to perform INS. Conduction velocity (CV) measurements were performed to assess differences in fiber type activation between INS and ES in the rat sciatic nerve and the goat vagus nerve. The rat sciatic nerve was chosen as a standard model because of its well-characterized physiology and extensive use in studies of INS mechanisms. The goat vagus nerve was chosen because of its expected high proportion of small-diameter fibers and its larger size, which allows sufficient separation between recording units to optimize CNAP measurements.

Results: The results showed that in the rat sciatic nerve, ES-excited fibers had significantly higher CVs (9.81 ± 3.18 m/s) than INS-excited fibers (8.10 ± 2.82 m/s). In the goat vagus nerve, ES produced a mean CV of 6.47 ± 1.25 m/s, but INS did not produce clearly distinguishable compound nerve action potential, highlighting the challenges of applying INS to larger nerves.

Comparison to existing methods: To the best of our knowledge, CV is, for the first time, measured to identify the type of nerve fiber excited by INS.

Conclusion: These results suggest that INS may preferentially activate smaller diameter fibers, providing insight for potential neuromodulation applications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "An MRI protocol for anatomical and functional evaluation of the California sea lion brain" [J. Neurosci. Methods 353 (2021) 109097]. Potential Mechanism and Efficacy Evaluation of Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease. Differences in conduction velocities of nerve fibers excited by infrared and electrical stimulation. Dual-pathway EEG model with channel attention for virtual reality motion sickness detection Generation of stable brain cell cultures from embryonic zebrafish to interrogate phenotypes in zebrafish mutants of neurodevelopmental disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1