Louis Vande Perre, Javier Chávez Cerda, Soizic Gochard, Maxime Verstraeten, Romain Raffoul, Catherine Leonard, Jean Delbeke, Riëm El Tahry, Simon-Pierre Gorza, Antoine Nonclercq
{"title":"Differences in conduction velocities of nerve fibers excited by infrared and electrical stimulation.","authors":"Louis Vande Perre, Javier Chávez Cerda, Soizic Gochard, Maxime Verstraeten, Romain Raffoul, Catherine Leonard, Jean Delbeke, Riëm El Tahry, Simon-Pierre Gorza, Antoine Nonclercq","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infrared neural stimulation (INS) uses short optical pulses to activate nerves. While electrical stimulation (ES) activates large-diameter fibers first, light may preferentially activate small-diameter fibers first, which could be valuable for many clinical applications.</p><p><strong>New method: </strong>This study used a compact diode laser of 1470 nm to perform INS. Conduction velocity (CV) measurements were performed to assess differences in fiber type activation between INS and ES in the rat sciatic nerve and the goat vagus nerve. The rat sciatic nerve was chosen as a standard model because of its well-characterized physiology and extensive use in studies of INS mechanisms. The goat vagus nerve was chosen because of its expected high proportion of small-diameter fibers and its larger size, which allows sufficient separation between recording units to optimize CNAP measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that in the rat sciatic nerve, ES-excited fibers had significantly higher CVs (9.81 ± 3.18 m/s) than INS-excited fibers (8.10 ± 2.82 m/s). In the goat vagus nerve, ES produced a mean CV of 6.47 ± 1.25 m/s, but INS did not produce clearly distinguishable compound nerve action potential, highlighting the challenges of applying INS to larger nerves.</p><p><strong>Comparison to existing methods: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, CV is, for the first time, measured to identify the type of nerve fiber excited by INS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that INS may preferentially activate smaller diameter fibers, providing insight for potential neuromodulation applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":" ","pages":"110427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Infrared neural stimulation (INS) uses short optical pulses to activate nerves. While electrical stimulation (ES) activates large-diameter fibers first, light may preferentially activate small-diameter fibers first, which could be valuable for many clinical applications.
New method: This study used a compact diode laser of 1470 nm to perform INS. Conduction velocity (CV) measurements were performed to assess differences in fiber type activation between INS and ES in the rat sciatic nerve and the goat vagus nerve. The rat sciatic nerve was chosen as a standard model because of its well-characterized physiology and extensive use in studies of INS mechanisms. The goat vagus nerve was chosen because of its expected high proportion of small-diameter fibers and its larger size, which allows sufficient separation between recording units to optimize CNAP measurements.
Results: The results showed that in the rat sciatic nerve, ES-excited fibers had significantly higher CVs (9.81 ± 3.18 m/s) than INS-excited fibers (8.10 ± 2.82 m/s). In the goat vagus nerve, ES produced a mean CV of 6.47 ± 1.25 m/s, but INS did not produce clearly distinguishable compound nerve action potential, highlighting the challenges of applying INS to larger nerves.
Comparison to existing methods: To the best of our knowledge, CV is, for the first time, measured to identify the type of nerve fiber excited by INS.
Conclusion: These results suggest that INS may preferentially activate smaller diameter fibers, providing insight for potential neuromodulation applications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.