Linking Cognitive Screening Tests in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Crosswalk between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic and the Mini-Mental State Examination

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105550
Siqi Cheng MD , Jiafan Qin MM , Chengbei Hou PhD , Yue Wu MD , Xinyan Du MM , Hongjun Liu BMed , Shaoyuan Lei PhD , Rui Li BMed , Xiaolin Yue MPH , Yansu Guo PhD
{"title":"Linking Cognitive Screening Tests in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Crosswalk between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic and the Mini-Mental State Examination","authors":"Siqi Cheng MD ,&nbsp;Jiafan Qin MM ,&nbsp;Chengbei Hou PhD ,&nbsp;Yue Wu MD ,&nbsp;Xinyan Du MM ,&nbsp;Hongjun Liu BMed ,&nbsp;Shaoyuan Lei PhD ,&nbsp;Rui Li BMed ,&nbsp;Xiaolin Yue MPH ,&nbsp;Yansu Guo PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop the crosswalk between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA-B) and Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) based on a community-dwelling older population to facilitate data synthesis and comparison.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>We used baseline data of 2170 subjects with total MoCA-B and MMSE scores from an ongoing prospective cohort study, the Beijing Longitudinal Disability Survey in Community Elderly (BLINDSCE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The MoCA-B and MMSE were administered by trained assessors. Equipercentile equating was used to develop the conversion table between MoCA-B and MMSE scores in the total sample and subgroups by age, sex, residency, and education level. The mean absolute error (MAE), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plot were used to evaluate the linking performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>MoCA-B and MMSE scores converted bi-directionally for the overall sample and subgroups, with small standardized MAE (SMAE) and high ICC. The linking results between MoCA-B and MMSE scores were consistent across the total sample and the age and sex subgroups, while a 2-score difference was observed within the residency and education subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>This study provides easy-to-use crosswalks between measures of MoCA-B and MMSE with precision among community-dwelling older adults. Our results help to compare and pool data across studies using either of the 2 cognitive screening tests and provide a useful reference to clinicians for better evidence-based practice in patients evaluated using different cognitive tests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 5","pages":"Article 105550"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861025000672","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To develop the crosswalk between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA-B) and Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) based on a community-dwelling older population to facilitate data synthesis and comparison.

Design

A cross-sectional study.

Setting and Participants

We used baseline data of 2170 subjects with total MoCA-B and MMSE scores from an ongoing prospective cohort study, the Beijing Longitudinal Disability Survey in Community Elderly (BLINDSCE).

Methods

The MoCA-B and MMSE were administered by trained assessors. Equipercentile equating was used to develop the conversion table between MoCA-B and MMSE scores in the total sample and subgroups by age, sex, residency, and education level. The mean absolute error (MAE), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman plot were used to evaluate the linking performance.

Results

MoCA-B and MMSE scores converted bi-directionally for the overall sample and subgroups, with small standardized MAE (SMAE) and high ICC. The linking results between MoCA-B and MMSE scores were consistent across the total sample and the age and sex subgroups, while a 2-score difference was observed within the residency and education subgroups.

Conclusions and Implications

This study provides easy-to-use crosswalks between measures of MoCA-B and MMSE with precision among community-dwelling older adults. Our results help to compare and pool data across studies using either of the 2 cognitive screening tests and provide a useful reference to clinicians for better evidence-based practice in patients evaluated using different cognitive tests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将社区老年人的认知筛查测试联系起来:蒙特利尔认知评估--基础版》与《小型精神状态检查》之间的对照表。
目的:建立基于社区老年人群的蒙特利尔认知评估-基本(MoCA-B)和迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)之间的交叉通道,以便于数据的综合和比较。设计:横断面研究。背景和参与者:我们使用了来自正在进行的前瞻性队列研究——北京社区老年人纵向残疾调查(BLINDSCE)的2170名受试者的MoCA-B和MMSE总分的基线数据。方法:MoCA-B和MMSE由经过培训的评估员进行管理。采用等百分位等价法,根据年龄、性别、居住地和教育水平,建立总样本和亚组中MoCA-B和MMSE得分之间的转换表。使用平均绝对误差(MAE)、类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman图来评估链接性能。结果:MoCA-B和MMSE得分双向转换为整体样本和亚组,标准化MAE (SMAE)小,ICC高。MoCA-B和MMSE得分之间的关联结果在整个样本和年龄和性别亚组中是一致的,而在居住和教育亚组中观察到2分的差异。结论和意义:本研究在社区居住的老年人中提供了易于使用的MoCA-B和MMSE测量之间的交叉点。我们的结果有助于比较和汇集使用两种认知筛查测试的研究数据,并为临床医生提供有用的参考,以便更好地在使用不同认知测试评估的患者中进行循证实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Virtual Reality on Cognitive Function and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment Trauma-Informed Care—The Staff Matter Too The Feasibility of Safe and Efficient Administration of COVID-19 Chemoprophylaxis to Nursing Home Residents Nursing Home to Home Pilot Program: Supporting Veterans by Facilitating and Monitoring Return to the Community The Willingness to Provide Private Care in the Future: Findings Based on a Nationwide, Representative Study in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1