Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Acute Pancreatitis Pain Core Outcome Set (CAPPOS): Study Protocol.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Pancreas Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1097/MPA.0000000000002488
Louise Kuhlmann, Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn, Nejo Joseph, James Lucocq, Jana Aulenkamp, Cecilie Siggaard Knoph, Søren S Olesen, John A Windsor, Asbjørn M Drewes, Sanjay Pandanaboyana
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Acute Pancreatitis Pain Core Outcome Set (CAPPOS): Study Protocol.","authors":"Louise Kuhlmann, Esther M Pogatzki-Zahn, Nejo Joseph, James Lucocq, Jana Aulenkamp, Cecilie Siggaard Knoph, Søren S Olesen, John A Windsor, Asbjørn M Drewes, Sanjay Pandanaboyana","doi":"10.1097/MPA.0000000000002488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a leading cause of gastrointestinal hospitalizations worldwide, with rising incidence, significant morbidity, and high healthcare costs. Pain, a hallmark symptom of AP, remains inadequately assessed, often relying on unidimensional scales such as visual analogue score, which fail to capture its multidimensional nature. Poorly managed acute pain negatively impacts clinical outcomes, prolongs recovery, and increases the risk of chronic pain syndromes. Comprehensive pain assessment tools specific to AP are lacking, highlighting the need for improved evaluation methods. The proposed study aims to develop and validate the Comprehensive Acute Pancreatitis Pain Outcome Set (CAPPOS) to address this evidence gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CAPPOS initiative follows COMET and COSMIN guidelines. Three systematic reviews will identify pain domains and assessment methods in AP, acute abdominal pain, and post-pancrectomy pain. A consensus process, using a modified Delphi approach, will involve multidisciplinary experts and patients to confirm and define key domains. Measurement tools will be selected for each domain and refined through iterative feedback. Pilot testing with 50 patients will evaluate the feasibility, clarity, and responsiveness to change of the preliminary tool. Validation studies with 200 AP patients will assess structural, content, and criterion validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change, ensuring content validity and clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAPPOS will provide a validated, multidimensional core outcome set to optimize pain assessment in AP. It will also facilitate standardized reporting in clinical trials, advancing research and care for AP-related pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19733,"journal":{"name":"Pancreas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a leading cause of gastrointestinal hospitalizations worldwide, with rising incidence, significant morbidity, and high healthcare costs. Pain, a hallmark symptom of AP, remains inadequately assessed, often relying on unidimensional scales such as visual analogue score, which fail to capture its multidimensional nature. Poorly managed acute pain negatively impacts clinical outcomes, prolongs recovery, and increases the risk of chronic pain syndromes. Comprehensive pain assessment tools specific to AP are lacking, highlighting the need for improved evaluation methods. The proposed study aims to develop and validate the Comprehensive Acute Pancreatitis Pain Outcome Set (CAPPOS) to address this evidence gap.

Methods: The CAPPOS initiative follows COMET and COSMIN guidelines. Three systematic reviews will identify pain domains and assessment methods in AP, acute abdominal pain, and post-pancrectomy pain. A consensus process, using a modified Delphi approach, will involve multidisciplinary experts and patients to confirm and define key domains. Measurement tools will be selected for each domain and refined through iterative feedback. Pilot testing with 50 patients will evaluate the feasibility, clarity, and responsiveness to change of the preliminary tool. Validation studies with 200 AP patients will assess structural, content, and criterion validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change, ensuring content validity and clinical utility.

Conclusion: CAPPOS will provide a validated, multidimensional core outcome set to optimize pain assessment in AP. It will also facilitate standardized reporting in clinical trials, advancing research and care for AP-related pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pancreas
Pancreas 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
289
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Pancreas provides a central forum for communication of original works involving both basic and clinical research on the exocrine and endocrine pancreas and their interrelationships and consequences in disease states. This multidisciplinary, international journal covers the whole spectrum of basic sciences, etiology, prevention, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and surgical and medical management of pancreatic diseases, including cancer.
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Acute Pancreatitis Pain Core Outcome Set (CAPPOS): Study Protocol. Replacing Liposomal Irinotecan with Standard Irinotecan in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Should We Follow Suit and Substitute Without Dispute? Impact of Abdominal Aortic Calcification on Pancreas Graft Survival in Patients Undergoing Simultaneous pancreas-kidney Transplantation. Total Pancreatectomy with Islet Autotransplant: Building a Multidisciplinary Program. Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Might be Limited to Biologically Borderline Resectable Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1