The American College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator does not predict individual outcomes in an elderly Italian population.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Minerva Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5691.25.10714-4
Stefano Siboni, Pietro Fusella, Pamela Milito, Roberta DE Maron, Francesca Senzani, Alessandro Meloni, Maria T Cuppone, Daniele Bernardi, Marco Sozzi, Emanuele L Asti
{"title":"The American College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator does not predict individual outcomes in an elderly Italian population.","authors":"Stefano Siboni, Pietro Fusella, Pamela Milito, Roberta DE Maron, Francesca Senzani, Alessandro Meloni, Maria T Cuppone, Daniele Bernardi, Marco Sozzi, Emanuele L Asti","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5691.25.10714-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elderly population has an increased risk of post-operative complications, therefore a precise and quick assessment of the expected risks allows a more aware decision on surgical indications. The American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-NSQIP SRC) is a practical tool that provides estimates of outcomes, however previous studies showed heterogeneous results. Our aim was to test its ability to correctly predict post-operative complications in a cohort of elderly patients who underwent major surgery in our Institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on consecutive elderly patients (≥75 years) that underwent major surgery (2022-2023) were retrospectively collected. The SRC was queried and the risk of post-operative complications, including geriatric outcomes, was obtained. Patients were divided into four groups based on CPT code. Observed and expected complication rates were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 112 patients (50.9% female, median age 80 years, median BMI 28.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were included and divided into groups (urgent 60 patients, colorectal 20, upper-GI resections 17 and benign upper-GI 15). In the urgent group, we observed a higher rate of serious complications (22 vs. 12.7, P=0.005), any complications (30 vs. 15.6, P<0.001) and superficial SSI (17 vs. 4.9, P<0.001) than the expected. Discharge to post-acute care facilities was over-estimated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ACS-NSQIP SRC demonstrated poor ability to predict post-operative complications and geriatric outcomes in our cohort of elderly patients. Our findings confirm other studies that temper the enthusiasm towards the NSQIP SRC as a practical tool to predict post-operative complications, especially in an urgent setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":29847,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5691.25.10714-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elderly population has an increased risk of post-operative complications, therefore a precise and quick assessment of the expected risks allows a more aware decision on surgical indications. The American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-NSQIP SRC) is a practical tool that provides estimates of outcomes, however previous studies showed heterogeneous results. Our aim was to test its ability to correctly predict post-operative complications in a cohort of elderly patients who underwent major surgery in our Institution.

Methods: Data on consecutive elderly patients (≥75 years) that underwent major surgery (2022-2023) were retrospectively collected. The SRC was queried and the risk of post-operative complications, including geriatric outcomes, was obtained. Patients were divided into four groups based on CPT code. Observed and expected complication rates were compared.

Results: A total of 112 patients (50.9% female, median age 80 years, median BMI 28.8 kg/m2) were included and divided into groups (urgent 60 patients, colorectal 20, upper-GI resections 17 and benign upper-GI 15). In the urgent group, we observed a higher rate of serious complications (22 vs. 12.7, P=0.005), any complications (30 vs. 15.6, P<0.001) and superficial SSI (17 vs. 4.9, P<0.001) than the expected. Discharge to post-acute care facilities was over-estimated.

Conclusions: The ACS-NSQIP SRC demonstrated poor ability to predict post-operative complications and geriatric outcomes in our cohort of elderly patients. Our findings confirm other studies that temper the enthusiasm towards the NSQIP SRC as a practical tool to predict post-operative complications, especially in an urgent setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国外科医生学会国家外科质量改进计划风险计算器无法预测意大利老年人群的个体结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Surgery
Minerva Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
320
期刊最新文献
Early mobilization after anatomical lung resection with thoracotomy. The American College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator does not predict individual outcomes in an elderly Italian population. An analysis of the effect of mechanical devices on compliance in prevention of deep vein thrombosis. Robotic parastomal hernia repair: an updated systematic review. Emergency robotic surgery: the beginning of new era in emergency setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1