The American College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator does not predict individual outcomes in an elderly Italian population.
Stefano Siboni, Pietro Fusella, Pamela Milito, Roberta DE Maron, Francesca Senzani, Alessandro Meloni, Maria T Cuppone, Daniele Bernardi, Marco Sozzi, Emanuele L Asti
{"title":"The American College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator does not predict individual outcomes in an elderly Italian population.","authors":"Stefano Siboni, Pietro Fusella, Pamela Milito, Roberta DE Maron, Francesca Senzani, Alessandro Meloni, Maria T Cuppone, Daniele Bernardi, Marco Sozzi, Emanuele L Asti","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5691.25.10714-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elderly population has an increased risk of post-operative complications, therefore a precise and quick assessment of the expected risks allows a more aware decision on surgical indications. The American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-NSQIP SRC) is a practical tool that provides estimates of outcomes, however previous studies showed heterogeneous results. Our aim was to test its ability to correctly predict post-operative complications in a cohort of elderly patients who underwent major surgery in our Institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on consecutive elderly patients (≥75 years) that underwent major surgery (2022-2023) were retrospectively collected. The SRC was queried and the risk of post-operative complications, including geriatric outcomes, was obtained. Patients were divided into four groups based on CPT code. Observed and expected complication rates were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 112 patients (50.9% female, median age 80 years, median BMI 28.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were included and divided into groups (urgent 60 patients, colorectal 20, upper-GI resections 17 and benign upper-GI 15). In the urgent group, we observed a higher rate of serious complications (22 vs. 12.7, P=0.005), any complications (30 vs. 15.6, P<0.001) and superficial SSI (17 vs. 4.9, P<0.001) than the expected. Discharge to post-acute care facilities was over-estimated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ACS-NSQIP SRC demonstrated poor ability to predict post-operative complications and geriatric outcomes in our cohort of elderly patients. Our findings confirm other studies that temper the enthusiasm towards the NSQIP SRC as a practical tool to predict post-operative complications, especially in an urgent setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":29847,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5691.25.10714-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Elderly population has an increased risk of post-operative complications, therefore a precise and quick assessment of the expected risks allows a more aware decision on surgical indications. The American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-NSQIP SRC) is a practical tool that provides estimates of outcomes, however previous studies showed heterogeneous results. Our aim was to test its ability to correctly predict post-operative complications in a cohort of elderly patients who underwent major surgery in our Institution.
Methods: Data on consecutive elderly patients (≥75 years) that underwent major surgery (2022-2023) were retrospectively collected. The SRC was queried and the risk of post-operative complications, including geriatric outcomes, was obtained. Patients were divided into four groups based on CPT code. Observed and expected complication rates were compared.
Results: A total of 112 patients (50.9% female, median age 80 years, median BMI 28.8 kg/m2) were included and divided into groups (urgent 60 patients, colorectal 20, upper-GI resections 17 and benign upper-GI 15). In the urgent group, we observed a higher rate of serious complications (22 vs. 12.7, P=0.005), any complications (30 vs. 15.6, P<0.001) and superficial SSI (17 vs. 4.9, P<0.001) than the expected. Discharge to post-acute care facilities was over-estimated.
Conclusions: The ACS-NSQIP SRC demonstrated poor ability to predict post-operative complications and geriatric outcomes in our cohort of elderly patients. Our findings confirm other studies that temper the enthusiasm towards the NSQIP SRC as a practical tool to predict post-operative complications, especially in an urgent setting.