Enhancing Socioeconomic Status Prediction for Cavities: A Hybrid Method.

A T M Dao, L G Do, N Stormon, H V Nguyen, D H Ha
{"title":"Enhancing Socioeconomic Status Prediction for Cavities: A Hybrid Method.","authors":"A T M Dao, L G Do, N Stormon, H V Nguyen, D H Ha","doi":"10.1177/00220345251324494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Socioeconomic status (SES) measures one's access to social resources across various dimensions. Traditionally, studies on SES commonly use principal component analysis (PCA), a data-driven method, to condense these dimensions into components, typically selecting the first component to represent SES. However, PCA may lack specificity for particular outcomes. Decision tree analysis (DTA), a knowledge-driven approach that identifies outcome-specific dimensions, may address PCA's weaknesses but might not comprehensively capture SES. This study hypothesized that combining DTA and PCA to create SES predictors could enhance predictive accuracy more than using PCA alone could. It also explored whether the DTA-PCA combination, incorporating only significant loading indicators (SLIs) of the first component, could simplify SES predictors without compromising predictive accuracy. The study analyzed 12 SES indicators from the Study of Mothers' and Infants' Life Events Affecting Oral Health (SMILE) birth cohort study, involving 2,182 children. Five SES composites were created: 1 solely from DTA-identified indicators and 2 pairs combining values from either the entire first PCA component or SLIs with and without DTA. These composites served as predictors for predicting dental caries in 5 predictive models. Model accuracy was evaluated using root mean squared error with 5-fold cross-validation. SES composites derived from the DTA-PCA combination demonstrated superior predictive accuracy compared with those from the PCA-only approach. By incorporating only SLIs, this hybrid method generated SES predictors that not only outperformed those using the entire first component but also demonstrated noninferiority relative to the DTA-only method. This approach offers a promising framework for developing SES composites to predict dental caries, potentially improving the precision of predictive models. In addition, this method offers a practical framework for creating composite predictors from multi-item measurements across various outcomes. For future research using this method, a 3-step process is recommended: (1) identify relevant items using DTA, (2) determine their weights through PCA, and (3) generate a composite using the SLIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental research","volume":" ","pages":"220345251324494"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345251324494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) measures one's access to social resources across various dimensions. Traditionally, studies on SES commonly use principal component analysis (PCA), a data-driven method, to condense these dimensions into components, typically selecting the first component to represent SES. However, PCA may lack specificity for particular outcomes. Decision tree analysis (DTA), a knowledge-driven approach that identifies outcome-specific dimensions, may address PCA's weaknesses but might not comprehensively capture SES. This study hypothesized that combining DTA and PCA to create SES predictors could enhance predictive accuracy more than using PCA alone could. It also explored whether the DTA-PCA combination, incorporating only significant loading indicators (SLIs) of the first component, could simplify SES predictors without compromising predictive accuracy. The study analyzed 12 SES indicators from the Study of Mothers' and Infants' Life Events Affecting Oral Health (SMILE) birth cohort study, involving 2,182 children. Five SES composites were created: 1 solely from DTA-identified indicators and 2 pairs combining values from either the entire first PCA component or SLIs with and without DTA. These composites served as predictors for predicting dental caries in 5 predictive models. Model accuracy was evaluated using root mean squared error with 5-fold cross-validation. SES composites derived from the DTA-PCA combination demonstrated superior predictive accuracy compared with those from the PCA-only approach. By incorporating only SLIs, this hybrid method generated SES predictors that not only outperformed those using the entire first component but also demonstrated noninferiority relative to the DTA-only method. This approach offers a promising framework for developing SES composites to predict dental caries, potentially improving the precision of predictive models. In addition, this method offers a practical framework for creating composite predictors from multi-item measurements across various outcomes. For future research using this method, a 3-step process is recommended: (1) identify relevant items using DTA, (2) determine their weights through PCA, and (3) generate a composite using the SLIs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Porphyromonas gingivalis Induces Disturbance of Kynurenine Metabolism Through the Gut-Brain Axis: Implications for Alzheimer's Disease. Dental Management of Genetic Dental Disorders: A Critical Review. Ginsenoside Rg3 Alleviates Xerostomia in Orchiectomized Mice via AR/AQP5. Anti-inflammatory Annexin A1 in Periodontitis via Formyl Peptide Receptor 2. Fighting the Antimicrobial Resistance Global Emergency: The Lifesaving Role of Dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1