Clinical aspects and controversies of spontaneous portosystemic shunts in cirrhotic patients.

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Minerva gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5985.25.03874-4
Simona Parisse, Erika Coltorti, Flaminia Ferri, Fabio Melandro, Mario Corona, Pierleone Lucatelli, Quirino Lai, Stefano Ginanni Corradini
{"title":"Clinical aspects and controversies of spontaneous portosystemic shunts in cirrhotic patients.","authors":"Simona Parisse, Erika Coltorti, Flaminia Ferri, Fabio Melandro, Mario Corona, Pierleone Lucatelli, Quirino Lai, Stefano Ginanni Corradini","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5985.25.03874-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSSs) are common among patients with liver cirrhosis. These vascular structures are collateral veins that directly connect the portal vein system with the systemic circulation. The prevalence increases as cirrhosis worsens. Published studies exist investigating the possible association between presence and extension of SPSSs and clinical manifestation of liver cirrhosis, however some issues continue to be debated. Recent research on this topic has extended knowledge and brought out interesting new aspects. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive and updated revision of the role of SPSSs in liver cirrhosis, from pathophysiology to clinical and therapeutic considerations, specifically addressing the most controversial and emerging findings. On this purpose PubMed and Medline were used as data sources and an extensive review of the literature, including the most recent and relevant published studies, was performed. The presence of SPSSs, especially if multiple and/or large, is associated with an increased risk of developing several complications of liver cirrhosis. Patients with higher MELD have larger SPSSs with negative impact on survival. Regarding hepatocellular carcinoma, there is evidence suggesting a potential tumorigenic effect associated with SPSSs, but further investigations on humans are needed. In the context of liver transplantation, the negative effect of SPSSs on graft function and patients' survival is a matter of debate, with no consensus on their surgical management. Currently, several interventional treatments have been proposed for SPSSs that have demonstrated excellent outcomes in selected populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94142,"journal":{"name":"Minerva gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"268-281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5985.25.03874-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSSs) are common among patients with liver cirrhosis. These vascular structures are collateral veins that directly connect the portal vein system with the systemic circulation. The prevalence increases as cirrhosis worsens. Published studies exist investigating the possible association between presence and extension of SPSSs and clinical manifestation of liver cirrhosis, however some issues continue to be debated. Recent research on this topic has extended knowledge and brought out interesting new aspects. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive and updated revision of the role of SPSSs in liver cirrhosis, from pathophysiology to clinical and therapeutic considerations, specifically addressing the most controversial and emerging findings. On this purpose PubMed and Medline were used as data sources and an extensive review of the literature, including the most recent and relevant published studies, was performed. The presence of SPSSs, especially if multiple and/or large, is associated with an increased risk of developing several complications of liver cirrhosis. Patients with higher MELD have larger SPSSs with negative impact on survival. Regarding hepatocellular carcinoma, there is evidence suggesting a potential tumorigenic effect associated with SPSSs, but further investigations on humans are needed. In the context of liver transplantation, the negative effect of SPSSs on graft function and patients' survival is a matter of debate, with no consensus on their surgical management. Currently, several interventional treatments have been proposed for SPSSs that have demonstrated excellent outcomes in selected populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝硬化患者自发性门系统分流的临床特点及争议。
自发性门系统分流(spss)在肝硬化患者中很常见。这些血管结构是直接连接门静脉系统和体循环的副静脉。随着肝硬化的恶化,患病率增加。已发表的研究调查了spss的存在和延长与肝硬化临床表现之间的可能关联,但一些问题仍存在争议。最近对这一课题的研究扩展了知识,并提出了有趣的新方面。本综述的目的是从病理生理学到临床和治疗考虑,提供spss在肝硬化中的作用的全面和最新的修订,特别是解决最具争议和新兴的发现。为此,我们使用PubMed和Medline作为数据来源,并对文献进行了广泛的回顾,包括最新和相关的已发表的研究。spss的存在,尤其是多发和/或较大的spss,与肝硬化并发症发生的风险增加有关。MELD越高的患者spss越大,对生存有负面影响。关于肝细胞癌,有证据表明spss有潜在的致瘤作用,但需要对人类进行进一步的研究。在肝移植的背景下,spss对移植物功能和患者生存的负面影响是一个有争议的问题,对其手术处理没有共识。目前,已经提出了几种针对spss的介入性治疗方法,并在特定人群中显示出良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy: an emerging modality for the treatment of malignant gastrointestinal obstruction. How to diagnose coeliac disease in 2026? Clinicopathological features of mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer: an observational experience from Romagna, Italy. Non-invasive staging of hepatic steatosis by Quantification Attenuation Index (QAI). Metabolic liver disease research in the Arab world: a bibliometric analysis of trends, collaborations, and disparities (2006-2024).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1