Ash to Asset: Evaluating the Efficacy of Reclaimed Fly Ash in Geopolymer Production

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145326
Aamar Danish, Anthony S. Torres
{"title":"Ash to Asset: Evaluating the Efficacy of Reclaimed Fly Ash in Geopolymer Production","authors":"Aamar Danish, Anthony S. Torres","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The availability of conventional fly ash (CFA) for producing building materials has decreased due to the closure of coal-fired power plants. Meanwhile, landfilled fly ash and the production of ordinary portland cement (OPC) present significant environmental and health threats. Thus, substitutes for CFA and OPC are necessary to meet the growing demand for sustainable and durable building materials. This study investigates the performance of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS)-based geopolymers that incorporate reclaimed fly ash (RFA) as a sustainable precursor material at replacement levels of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100%. The performance of these geopolymers was thoroughly evaluated through physical, mechanical, durability, and microstructural analyses. The findings showed that RFA enhances the fluidity of geopolymers compared to GGBFS due to its spherical particle shape, similar to CFA. However, GGBFS-dominated specimens exhibited superior performance in strength and some durability properties compared to RFA-rich counterparts, likely due to the slower polymerization of RFA. Additionally, geopolymers with RFA demonstrated better resistance to alkali-silica reactivity, freeze-thaw cycles, and high-temperature exposure. Microstructural analysis revealed that the reactivity, amorphous phases, and bonding structure of RFA are like those of CFA. Although pure RFA may not be ideal for producing geopolymers, blending it with GGBFS meets performance standards and helps reduce the burden of landfilled fly ash. Notably, geopolymers with approximately 60% RFA were found to be particularly suitable, balancing performance and sustainability. This blend also addresses the supply-demand gap of CFA, mitigating environmental degradation and reducing reliance on OPC.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"201 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145326","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The availability of conventional fly ash (CFA) for producing building materials has decreased due to the closure of coal-fired power plants. Meanwhile, landfilled fly ash and the production of ordinary portland cement (OPC) present significant environmental and health threats. Thus, substitutes for CFA and OPC are necessary to meet the growing demand for sustainable and durable building materials. This study investigates the performance of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS)-based geopolymers that incorporate reclaimed fly ash (RFA) as a sustainable precursor material at replacement levels of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100%. The performance of these geopolymers was thoroughly evaluated through physical, mechanical, durability, and microstructural analyses. The findings showed that RFA enhances the fluidity of geopolymers compared to GGBFS due to its spherical particle shape, similar to CFA. However, GGBFS-dominated specimens exhibited superior performance in strength and some durability properties compared to RFA-rich counterparts, likely due to the slower polymerization of RFA. Additionally, geopolymers with RFA demonstrated better resistance to alkali-silica reactivity, freeze-thaw cycles, and high-temperature exposure. Microstructural analysis revealed that the reactivity, amorphous phases, and bonding structure of RFA are like those of CFA. Although pure RFA may not be ideal for producing geopolymers, blending it with GGBFS meets performance standards and helps reduce the burden of landfilled fly ash. Notably, geopolymers with approximately 60% RFA were found to be particularly suitable, balancing performance and sustainability. This blend also addresses the supply-demand gap of CFA, mitigating environmental degradation and reducing reliance on OPC.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Insights into an Emerging and Bioenergy-Producing Desalination Technology: Microbial Desalination Cells (MDCs) Optimizing agricultural water-land resource allocation in water-economic-environment cycles considering uncertainties of spatiotemporal water footprints Study on CO formation and pore structure development during low-temperature oxidation of coal in CO2-N2 environment Upcycling Ceramic Industrial and Local Plastic Waste into Alternative Construction Materials Focusing on Performance and Material Utilization Ash to Asset: Evaluating the Efficacy of Reclaimed Fly Ash in Geopolymer Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1