Tumor burden and heterogenous treatment effect of apalutamide in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35819
Wataru Fukuokaya MD, Keiichiro Mori MD, PhD, Takafumi Yanagisawa MD, PhD, Fumihiko Urabe MD, PhD, Pawel Rajwa MD, PhD, Alberto Briganti MD, PhD, Shahrokh F. Shariat MD, PhD, Nobuaki Matsubara MD, Takahiro Kimura MD, PhD, Akihiro Hirakawa PhD
{"title":"Tumor burden and heterogenous treatment effect of apalutamide in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer","authors":"Wataru Fukuokaya MD,&nbsp;Keiichiro Mori MD, PhD,&nbsp;Takafumi Yanagisawa MD, PhD,&nbsp;Fumihiko Urabe MD, PhD,&nbsp;Pawel Rajwa MD, PhD,&nbsp;Alberto Briganti MD, PhD,&nbsp;Shahrokh F. Shariat MD, PhD,&nbsp;Nobuaki Matsubara MD,&nbsp;Takahiro Kimura MD, PhD,&nbsp;Akihiro Hirakawa PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Investigation remains incomplete regarding potential variations in the effect of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, including apalutamide, based on baseline tumor burden in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The authors analyzed individual participant-level data from 1052 patients with mCSPC who were randomized in the TITAN trial (apalutamide vs. placebo, both with androgen-deprivation therapy). Outcomes included radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), second PFS (PFS2), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, with and without restricted cubic splines, were used to determine the association between apalutamide benefit and bone metastasis count or visceral metastasis. Subgroup treatment effects were quantified based on inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Analysis using restricted cubic splines indicated that apalutamide provided less benefit for PFS2 and OS in patients with fewer bone metastases. The authors also found evidence of a heterogeneous effect of apalutamide on PFS2 and OS between patients with two or less bone metastases and those with three or more bone metastases. In patients who had two or less bone metastases, there was no evidence of a benefit from apalutamide for radiographic PFS (HR, 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35–1.22), PFS2 (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.66–2.12), or OS (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.60–1.83). No evidence of an association was noted between visceral metastasis and apalutamide benefit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The addition of apalutamide to androgen-deprivation therapy may provide less benefit in patients with mCSPC who have fewer bone metastases. Counting baseline bone metastases may help identify optimal candidates for apalutamide treatment of mCSPC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical trials registration</h3>\n \n <p>NCT02489318</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain language summary</h3>\n \n <div>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>\n \n <p>In an analysis of individual participant data from a trial (the TITAN trial) in patients with metastatic (spreading) castration-sensitive prostate cancer, treatment intensification based on the addition new drugs to standard androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) was analyzed and compared with the effects in patients who received only standard ADT.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li>\n \n <p>Compared with ADT alone, the survival benefit of adding the new drug apalutamide to standard ADT varied according to the number of bone metastases, but no association was observed between the spread of cancer to soft tissues and organs and a survival benefit from adding apalutamide.</p>\n </li>\n \n <li>\n \n <p>The results indicate that counting the number of bone metastases may help identify which patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer are optimal candidates for treatment intensification with the addition of apalutamide to standard ADT.</p>\n </li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Investigation remains incomplete regarding potential variations in the effect of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, including apalutamide, based on baseline tumor burden in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC).

Methods

The authors analyzed individual participant-level data from 1052 patients with mCSPC who were randomized in the TITAN trial (apalutamide vs. placebo, both with androgen-deprivation therapy). Outcomes included radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), second PFS (PFS2), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, with and without restricted cubic splines, were used to determine the association between apalutamide benefit and bone metastasis count or visceral metastasis. Subgroup treatment effects were quantified based on inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs).

Results

Analysis using restricted cubic splines indicated that apalutamide provided less benefit for PFS2 and OS in patients with fewer bone metastases. The authors also found evidence of a heterogeneous effect of apalutamide on PFS2 and OS between patients with two or less bone metastases and those with three or more bone metastases. In patients who had two or less bone metastases, there was no evidence of a benefit from apalutamide for radiographic PFS (HR, 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35–1.22), PFS2 (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.66–2.12), or OS (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.60–1.83). No evidence of an association was noted between visceral metastasis and apalutamide benefit.

Conclusions

The addition of apalutamide to androgen-deprivation therapy may provide less benefit in patients with mCSPC who have fewer bone metastases. Counting baseline bone metastases may help identify optimal candidates for apalutamide treatment of mCSPC.

Clinical trials registration

NCT02489318

Plain language summary

  • In an analysis of individual participant data from a trial (the TITAN trial) in patients with metastatic (spreading) castration-sensitive prostate cancer, treatment intensification based on the addition new drugs to standard androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) was analyzed and compared with the effects in patients who received only standard ADT.

  • Compared with ADT alone, the survival benefit of adding the new drug apalutamide to standard ADT varied according to the number of bone metastases, but no association was observed between the spread of cancer to soft tissues and organs and a survival benefit from adding apalutamide.

  • The results indicate that counting the number of bone metastases may help identify which patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer are optimal candidates for treatment intensification with the addition of apalutamide to standard ADT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿帕鲁胺治疗转移性去势敏感前列腺癌的肿瘤负荷及异质性治疗效果。
背景:在转移性去势敏感前列腺癌(mCSPC)患者中,基于基线肿瘤负荷的雄激素受体途径抑制剂(包括阿帕鲁胺)作用的潜在变化的研究仍不完整。方法:作者分析了在TITAN试验中随机分配的1052例mCSPC患者的个体参与者水平数据(阿帕鲁胺与安慰剂,均采用雄激素剥夺治疗)。结果包括影像学无进展生存期(PFS)、二次PFS (PFS2)和总生存期(OS)。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型(有或没有限制三次样条)来确定阿帕鲁胺的疗效与骨转移计数或内脏转移之间的关系。亚组治疗效果根据治疗加权校正风险比(HRs)的逆概率进行量化。结果:限制性三次样条分析表明,对于骨转移较少的患者,阿帕鲁胺对PFS2和OS的益处较小。作者还发现了阿帕鲁胺对两个或更少骨转移患者和三个或更多骨转移患者PFS2和OS的异质性影响的证据。在有两个或更少骨转移的患者中,没有证据表明阿帕鲁胺对放射学PFS有益处(HR, 0.65;95%可信区间[CI], 0.35-1.22), PFS2 (HR, 1.18;95% CI, 0.66-2.12)或OS (HR, 1.05;95% ci, 0.60-1.83)。没有证据表明内脏转移和阿帕鲁胺的益处之间存在关联。结论:对于骨转移较少的mCSPC患者,在雄激素剥夺治疗中加入阿帕鲁胺可能带来的益处较少。计算基线骨转移可能有助于确定阿帕鲁胺治疗mCSPC的最佳候选者。摘要:在一项针对转移(扩散)去势敏感前列腺癌患者的试验(TITAN试验)的个体参与者数据分析中,分析了在标准雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)基础上添加新药的治疗强化,并与仅接受标准ADT的患者的效果进行了比较。与单独使用ADT相比,在标准ADT中添加新药阿帕鲁胺的生存获益根据骨转移的数量而变化,但没有观察到癌症向软组织和器官的扩散与添加阿帕鲁胺的生存获益之间的关联。结果表明,计算骨转移的数量可能有助于确定哪些转移性去势敏感前列腺癌患者是在标准ADT基础上加用阿帕鲁胺加强治疗的最佳人选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
Early time of day of administration of immunochemotherapy for enhancing overall survival in patients with lung cancer irrespective of histological type? Cervical cancer elimination in India: Repurposing diagnostics, vaccination, and accelerating policy for the 2030 target. Assessing the utility of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) as a screening tool among caregivers of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation survivors. Incidence and oncologic outcomes of patients with prostate-specific antigen persistence after radical prostatectomy. Fear of recurrence, secondary cancers, and health problems in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: Findings from a Canadian cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1