Long-term outdoor operation of microalgae-based digestate treatment: impact of external drivers on process performances and techno-economic assessment

IF 9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Bioresource Technology Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132406
S. Rossi , M. Mantovani , F. Marazzi , V. Mezzanotte , E. Ficara
{"title":"Long-term outdoor operation of microalgae-based digestate treatment: impact of external drivers on process performances and techno-economic assessment","authors":"S. Rossi ,&nbsp;M. Mantovani ,&nbsp;F. Marazzi ,&nbsp;V. Mezzanotte ,&nbsp;E. Ficara","doi":"10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A pilot-scale algal pond for liquid digestate treatment (5.8 m<sup>2</sup>, 0.75–1.83 m<sup>3</sup>) was operated outdoor for 1145 cumulative days. Key performance indicators were correlated with relevant external drivers including influent characteristics, weather conditions, and operational parameters, gaining information for management and optimisation. A techno-economic assessment allowed to calculate and validate process costs for a scaled-up plant (2-ha). Despite external factors, thanks to consistent nitrification, ammonium removal was high and stable during all trials (85 ± 8%). Environmental and operational conditions strongly influenced phosphate removal (51 ± 21%) and biomass productivity (10.4 ± 6.6 g TSS/m<sup>2</sup>/d). High biomass productivities were mostly associated to global radiation, while phosphate removal was influenced by digestate characteristics. The relatively low biomass production costs (6.9 €/kg or 7.4 $/kg) and substantial savings for liquid digestate bioremediation (3.4 €/m<sup>3</sup> or 3.7 $/m<sup>3</sup>) and N removal (15.1 €/kg N or 16.2 $/kg N) confirmed the high potential of microalgae-based technologies as a cost-effective and sustainable alternative to conventional approaches for wastewater bioremediation and resource recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":258,"journal":{"name":"Bioresource Technology","volume":"427 ","pages":"Article 132406"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresource Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852425003724","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A pilot-scale algal pond for liquid digestate treatment (5.8 m2, 0.75–1.83 m3) was operated outdoor for 1145 cumulative days. Key performance indicators were correlated with relevant external drivers including influent characteristics, weather conditions, and operational parameters, gaining information for management and optimisation. A techno-economic assessment allowed to calculate and validate process costs for a scaled-up plant (2-ha). Despite external factors, thanks to consistent nitrification, ammonium removal was high and stable during all trials (85 ± 8%). Environmental and operational conditions strongly influenced phosphate removal (51 ± 21%) and biomass productivity (10.4 ± 6.6 g TSS/m2/d). High biomass productivities were mostly associated to global radiation, while phosphate removal was influenced by digestate characteristics. The relatively low biomass production costs (6.9 €/kg or 7.4 $/kg) and substantial savings for liquid digestate bioremediation (3.4 €/m3 or 3.7 $/m3) and N removal (15.1 €/kg N or 16.2 $/kg N) confirmed the high potential of microalgae-based technologies as a cost-effective and sustainable alternative to conventional approaches for wastewater bioremediation and resource recovery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微藻沼液处理长期室外运行:外部驱动因素对工艺性能的影响及技术经济评价
一个用于液体消化处理的中试藻类池(5.8 m2, 0.75-1.83 m3)在室外累计运行1145天。关键绩效指标与相关外部驱动因素(包括进水特性、天气条件和操作参数)相关联,从而获得管理和优化所需的信息。技术经济评估允许计算和验证扩大工厂(2公顷)的工艺成本。尽管存在外部因素,但由于持续的硝化作用,在所有试验中铵的去除率都很高且稳定(85 ± 8 %)。环境和操作条件强烈影响磷酸盐去除率(51 ± 21 %)和生物质生产力(10.4 ± 6.6 g TSS/m2/d)。高生物量生产力与全球辐射有关,而磷酸盐去除主要受消化特性的影响。相对较低的生物质生产成本(6.9欧元/公斤或7.4美元/公斤)以及液体消化生物修复(3.4欧元/立方米或3.7美元/立方米)和N去除(15.1欧元/公斤N或16.2美元/公斤N)的大量节省,证实了微藻技术作为传统方法的成本效益和可持续替代方案的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bioresource Technology
Bioresource Technology 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
19.30%
发文量
2013
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: Bioresource Technology publishes original articles, review articles, case studies, and short communications covering the fundamentals, applications, and management of bioresource technology. The journal seeks to advance and disseminate knowledge across various areas related to biomass, biological waste treatment, bioenergy, biotransformations, bioresource systems analysis, and associated conversion or production technologies. Topics include: • Biofuels: liquid and gaseous biofuels production, modeling and economics • Bioprocesses and bioproducts: biocatalysis and fermentations • Biomass and feedstocks utilization: bioconversion of agro-industrial residues • Environmental protection: biological waste treatment • Thermochemical conversion of biomass: combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, catalysis.
期刊最新文献
Sequential enzymatic hydrolysis enables isolation of bioactive functional group-enriched lignin-carbohydrate complex: Insights into structure and α-glucosidase inhibition potential. Reusable target-site toolkit for large-fragment (56.2 kilobases) chromosomal integration to enhance erythromycin biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Carbon-efficient microbial protein production via continuous co-cultivation of methane- and hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria. Unlocking dual lignin valorization from moso bamboo via ethylene glycol-tuned deep eutectic solvent fractionation. Corrigendum to "Anodic microbiota reassembly via cell-cell interactions confers oxygen resilience in microbial fuel cells" [Bioresour. Technol. 443 (2026) 133815].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1